The ultimate reference to the Bible is in Genesis. Women were made from the rib of man. Without a man first being created, women would never exist. This is the ultimate reality that feminists can never get over or get past. All effort at feminist supremacy are therefor doomed.
33 comments
Wi Tu Lo = We Too Low.
Poe?
But Genesis 1:27 implies God created men and women simultaneously:
"So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them."
''Without a man first being created, women would never exist.’'
Or God could’ve created them out of the ground like he did Adam!
''All effort at feminist supremacy are therefor doomed.’'
No they aren’t and your reasoning for this statement is the worst i’ve ever seen.
Women were made from the rib of man. Without a man first being created, women would never exist.
That's why so many Christians believe men have one less rib than women. I'd say you're the one with the 'reality' issue.
Also, what is it about equality , not supremacy that you don't understand? Feminism was never about 'supremacy', except in the deluded beliefs of RadFems - a delusion not unlike the belief christians push about unquestioned male headship.
Neither sex is superior to the other. Anyone who claims otherwise is fucked in the head by religion or radicalized and unstable. Frequently both.
Well, I agree that every woman exists because of a man, but the reverse is also true. Feminist supremacy is stupid, but so is the inverse. Let's try to shoot for something else, like equality.
You forgot Genesis 1, apparently. In there he created humans as men AND women, at the same time.
No, honey, it's your ultimate fairy tale that feminists laugh themselves silly over.
For the umpteenth time; we want EQUALITY, not supremacy. We can see how bad society is when one gender dominates the other; we don't want the same bad in reverse.
But if woman was created from the rib of man, wouldn't that make women superior, as they would have a full set of ribs, whereas men would be missing one?
Genesis 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
There are two versions about the creation of man and woman in Genesis. In this version, which is the first, God creates male and female at the same time.
Christian apologists claim that this is just a summary while Genesis 2:22, which talks about the rib, is detail.
The Jews recognize this discrepancy. Their explanation is the myth of Lilith, Adam's first wife.
"Without a man first being created, women would never exist. This is the ultimate reality"
You clearly have no idea what the word "reality" means then since embryological and genetic studies show that in humans, males are basically just modified females. Look what happens when the SRY gene on the Y chromosome breaks or all your cells have broken androgen receptors and can't respond to male hormones during the sex-dependent stage of embryological development. You get individuals with a 46 X,Y karyotype who are completely female. (They're also sterile, but that doesn't make them any less female, though I'm sure this assclown would disagree).
Also, feminist supremacist is a contradiction of terms, you dimbass.
That was Eve, remember? The first AND LAST of those imaginary "women from a man's rib". And since you fail so badly at critical reasoning, it isn't going to take very much for women to be superior to you.
The ultimate reference to the bible is itself? You want to try rewording that into something that makes sen- er, more sense.
Also your myth fails for not being able to decide within itself whether men and women were created simultaneously or in the way you claim.
Actually, Genesis contains two different and incompatible creation myths, one in chapter 1 and one in chapter 2. In chapter one we're told Adam and Eve were created independently and together, with animals created there after.
It's only in the second chapter we're told instead Adam was created first, followed by animals and then, after both adam and animals, eve was created from Adam's rib.
There's certainly no rational reason to prefer the account where Eve was not created simultaneously as Adam's equal. over the other
Feminist supremacy isn't as bad as it sounds. Wouldn't it be great to live in a world where the feminist ideal of equality between the sexes was supreme, rather than this "women are men's property" crap?
This guy seems to think "female" and "feminist" are synonymous. If only...
I've read Genesis, but I can't remember any reference in there to the Bible.
According to Nordic mythology Odin took two tree trunks, one ash and one elm, and blew life into them. The ash became the first man, Ask, and the elm the first woman, Embla. See, we can get both over and past Genesis.
Feminism is about EQUALITY between men and women, stupid. Stop projecting!
You do of course realise that a lot of feminists think that creationism is bunk right.
Let me guess- you need to believe that Genesis is true because it is the only justification you have for seeing them as there to make you sammiches and give you head.
The Church of England openly admit that much of the Bible - including Genesis - is purely fable and metaphor: as in not to be taken literally .
image
Just ask Archdeacon Sheila Watson (r), IQ Lo.
according to some sources, adams first wife lilith was created at the same time, but left adam cause of some sex position stuff. anyways im sure she would have children. and according to genesis, angels/demons got involved in the fun later down so people today would have equal women, inferior rib women? angel and an ungodly amount of incest blood in them.
this being said who actually gives a shit who was supposedly created first? where is it written or demonstrated the being created second means your inferior. women could be god's humans v2, an attempt to correct the fuckup he made in men.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
