Dan Payne #fundie

Dan Payne #fundie raptureforums.com

Islamic Invasion of America

I am growing very weary of writing over and over again about the false narrative of true Islam. Why do so many people rush to defend Islamic terrorists who kill in the name of their god?

A devout follower of Jesus Christ will submit his neck to the sword. A devout follower of Muhammad will commit his sword to the neck.

Insult Christ and a true Christian may pray for you. Insult Muhammad and a true Muslim may slay you.

I've said it before and I'll say it again: The most "radical" born-again Christian fundamentalist would be someone who walked in perfect love and humility. The most radical Islamic fundamentalist would be someone who walked in perfect Jihad against all who do not practice true Islam.

Just because false Islam rides in defense and peace during its response to a terrorist attack, doesn't mean that true Islam did not ride in offense and war during its execution of that same terrorist attack.

Likewise, just because someone kills innocent civilians under the banner of Christianity doesn't mean that true Christianity is a death cult. True Islam has to be compared with true Christianity.

Any attempt to compare false "peaceful" Islam with false "militant" Christianity is morally irresponsible and reckless. True Islam is militant and true Christianity is peaceful. To say otherwise is an outright lie.

33 comments

old comment by Zachski

"Why do so many people rush to defend Islamic terrorists who kill in the name of their god?"

On the contrary: People rush to defend the innocents who are unfairly blamed for the actions of the terrorists. They rush to defend the innocents whose homes and places where they peacefully gather are firebombed because some cartoonists got killed by a couple of brutes. They rush to defend the innocents who are kicked out of places simply for existing and being Muslim.

"A devout follower of Jesus Christ will submit his neck to the sword. A devout follower of Muhammad will commit his sword to the neck."

Devout followers of both have done both. A devout atheist also has the capacity to do both. Religion, or lack thereof, has no capacity on your ability to do good or evil.

"I've said it before and I'll say it again: The most "radical" born-again Christian fundamentalist would be someone who walked in perfect love and humility. The most radical Islamic fundamentalist would be someone who walked in perfect Jihad against all who do not practice true Islam."

This is not something you get to decide. We have seen the results of both and both are harmful, sick, and twisted.

We have also seen the results of peace-bearing progressives of both and the results are *good* in those cases.

old comment by Jerry

rubber:

It doesn't matter how many Moohamadans are out there, or that many amongst nominal Moslems are not not true to their bogus faith. What matters is what their scripture teaches and commands of them. And that is very ugly and murderous.

It is similar to that of the KKK, to whom the true Christian ministers rather often to urge them to reject their lieberalism and racism. The KKK religion teaches them to murder the black man. But how many murders of black people by the KKK have you heard about in the recent years? Probably none. Would you therefore say that KKK membership is generally good, and it's only the "radicals" that are a problem? Would you welcome moderate KKK to your neighborhood? Because if you were to be consistent with your theology/philosophy of your particular brand of satanism, you should be welcoming them with arms wide open, just like you do the "moderate" Moohamadans.

Incidentally, the true Christian would "welcome" either with firearms pointed at their gut.

In the name of the Lord,
Jerry

old comment by tipsyGnostalgic

I am growing very weary of writing over and over again about the false narrative of true Christianity. Why do so many people rush to defend Christian terrorists who kill, discriminated, and break the law in the name of their god?

A devout follower of Muhammad will submit his neck to the sword. A devout follower of Christian will commit his AR-15 to the forehead.

Insult Christ and a true Christian may picket your funeral, dox you, or shoot up your workplace. Insult Muhammad and a true Muslim may give you a disgusted glare before walking in the other direction.

I've said it before and I'll say it again: The most "radical" born-again Muslim fundamentalist would be someone who walked in perfect love and humility. The most radical Christian fundamentalist would be someone who walked in perfect Jihad against all who do not practice true Christianity.

Just because false Christianity rides in defense and peace during its response to a terrorist attack, doesn't mean that true Christianity did not ride in offense and war during its execution of that same terrorist attack.

Likewise, just because someone kills innocent civilians under the banner of Islam doesn't mean that true Islam is a death cult. True Christianity has to be compared with true Islam.

Any attempt to compare false "peaceful" Christianity with false "militant" Islam is morally irresponsible and reckless. True Christianity is militant and true Islam is peaceful. To say otherwise is an outright lie.

(lmao who am I kidding all Abrahamic religion is a death cult)