Number one, I'm not probing because I listen to Kent Hovind. I'm probing b/c you can't provde a scientific experiment that proves the Big Bang as true. It would then become a fact and not a theory that evidence may point towards.
17 comments
"[...] you can't provde [sic] a scientific experiment that proves the Big Bang as true."
Microwave background radiation. Wikipedia it for a detailed explanation. Tune your television to a channel which isn't being used for a real-life demonstration.
Proof enough for you?
> you can't provde a scientific experiment that proves the Big Bang as true
Start with the Doppler shift of the light reaching us from distant galaxies, and then continue with the last 85 years of developments in astronomy and cosmology. Reading up on that will teach you far more than Kent Hovind ever could.
"I listen to Kent Hovind" automatically excludes you from participating further in any discourse where the average IQ of the participants doesn't come with a minus sign in front of it.
So, in other words, Rupture Ready is about your level.
And you Hovind fans that claim Hovind doesn't need real scientific credentials to understand science.
What experiments or evidence has he put forward for any of his "theories"?
None. Like all creationists Hovind just asserts a premise and supports it with lies about science or vauge interpretations from the Bible.
Yet, like all other creationists he demands 100% evidence for any scientific claim.
“Number one, I'm not probing because I listen to Kent Hovind.”
“I'm probing b/c you can't provde a scientific experiment that proves the Big Bang as true.”
“It would then become a fact and not a theory that evidence may point towards.”
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
