[Question: Who believes in evolution?]
Answer:
No
The blob that "banged" how,where, when,why,etc?
30 comments
Ok, dunno if the Platypus is a good example to throw in here. Cause it looks like a mix of a beaver and a duck, and we're not saying the platypus is the most recent common ancestor of the duck and the beaver.
I'd rather use the Archeopteryx or something.
OR: Us humans are a good example. Cause we look like a mix of our ancestors from a few million years past and our descendants from a few million years in the future. :P
The blob that "banged"
Now enterring: VenomfangX levels of Creatardation.
"Apes,monkeys,horses,dogs,etc. still look and act the same as they did in the past."
How do you know that? Were you there!!1!!one!1!!?
"No animal is half and half (part one type animal part a new kind of animal)."
Prove it.
Cromagnons were half-human, half-ape-like ancestor.
The Big Bang is not part of or relevant to evolution.
No, dogs and horses do NOT look as they did long ago.
Apes and Monkeys have evolved to the point they are and haven't had environmental influences needed to change.
Half and Half animal is a hybrid, not evolution.
"The blob that "banged" how,where, when,why,etc?"
Eh?
"Apes,monkeys,horses,dogs,etc. still look and act the same as they did in the past."
To pull a page for the fundy playbook: How do you know? Where you there !?
I'd suggest you go to a museum but you'd probably end up at one of those horrid little creationist shams masquerading as something worthy of the title of "museum".
"No animal is half and half (part one type animal part a new kind of animal)."
Never heard of a platypus? Tell me that doesn't look like it's half and half.
Actually I think you will find that all animals are exactly 1/2 way between the formes they have taken in the past, and the forms they will take in the future. Baring extinction of course, which is pretty effective at stoping natural selection in its tracks. So a human is half ancestor-ape-thing and half future-more-evolved-ape-thing.
The only reason comments like this are made is because in the time since the word "rabbit" for instance was coined, the changes to the species have not been anywhere near significant enough to stop us using the word rabbit. That said, we have seen new breeds of rabbits arise, which have specific names.
But you're part bumpkin, part asshat and part idiot, and yet, you're a complete bumpkin, a complete asshat and a complete idiot. Kind of a stupidity trinity.
nfp
*walks on over and stands within whispering distance of nfp before leaving him/her a nice bit of advice*
Psssst....the cake is a lie.
What about the crocoduck? oh wait
How about horses with toes? (check with your friendly fossil archive)
and so many many more wonderful critters that are evolutionary mixes (part one type species, part evolved new species)
in the begining there was nothing - which exploded! lol
but yeah, i live in Australia, we have the forementioned Platypus (that's like three animals in one), as well as a few other incredibly bizzare animals. We have this cute little desert hopping marsupial thing that is a mix of a kagaroo and a mouse. We have wallabies that are just small kangaroos.http://www.voanews.com/english/archive/2006-07/2006-07-15-voa7.cfm
:-)
The question was WHO believes in evolution, not DO YOU believe in evolution!
It gets stupider from there.
...I still don't understand the sentence that begins "The blob that "banged""...But apes, monkeys, horses, and dogs DO look and act the same as they did in the past...If by "past" you mean the last ten years or so. And for once, a fundie's right: There ARE no such things as chimeras.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
