(About the husband of a feminist who committed suicide. There were absolutely no suspicions of foul play from the police or anyone else except this dingbat and her followers.)

i always assume that if a woman ends up dead, a man did it. i assume this across the board, no matter what it “looks like.” fell down the stairs? drowned? was there a kennedy man anywhere nearby? it was probably a man that killed her, it was almost certainly deliberate, and if she was partnered or married to a man, it was probably him that did it. the cops know this too, of course, because its the truth about “violence” and “crime”. to put “male” in front of those words would be redundant. that must be why no one ever says it.
(...)
so anyway, i recently read about a womans apparent “”"”suicide”"”" (thats 4 sets of red-flag quotes) and immediately suspected her husband. he was a psychologist, which made me suspect him even more — doctors wives seem especially clumsy and prone to attracting sharp objects, projectiles, poison. and psychologists/psychiatrists just might be more sadistic and misogynistic than your average sadistic, misogynistic male. creepy, pervsplaning fuckers, those.
(...)
for probably the first time in many years, i actually believed the husband. i do not think he probably killed her. i think it probably happened exactly as he said.

my conclusion was involuntary, and surprising. upon reflection and discussion, i still think its probably right. although obviously the husband should be investigated to within an inch of his life, just to be sure. and because his wife died on his watch, that should count as at least one strike against him, and should be taken into consideration in all future contexts, including but not limited to dating, job prospects, and jury service. you know, instead of counting as zero strikes like it does now. it doesnt count, even when the guy actually did it, and even when everyone knows it. that is all.