Jonathan Wetsel #fundie

Jonathan Wetsel #fundie osu.facebook.com

[Regarding the scientific theory of evolution]

I'm trying to help you guys to understand that what you believe is a fairy tale just like the three stories I posted. Your theory is not only religious, it is not only un-scientific, it is ANTI-scientific! You have no choice but to believe what has been disproven CENTURIES ago! Why? I think it's because you don't want to admit there is a God because if you do, you might have to follow some rules. "Thou shalt not. . ." Oh no! We don't like that idea! I know! Let's just all bury our heads in the sand and buy into this theory that Darwin (who wasn't even a scientist) proposed 150 years ago for which he had NO PROOF whatsoever!

Great idea!

35 comments

old comment by Swede

Being a scientist is to follow strict rules and guidelines, i.e. follow the scientific method. Being a human being living in a society means following the rules and the laws of that society.
If your hypothesis was true, there would be a majority of atheists in every prison.

You don't propose a theory, not in science anyway. You propose an hypothesis. After it has been proven again, and again, and again to be correct, THEN it becomes a Theory. Every time something new is discovered, like DNA, the Theory is once again tested several times before being reinstated as a Theory.

Scientists start with evidence and follow where it leads them. If the evidence doesn't fit their hypothesis, then they discard the hypothesis.
Creationists start with a story and try to bully all evidence into fitting their story. If the evidence doesn't fit, they discard the evidence.

old comment by Anon-e-moose

"this theory that Darwin (who wasn't even a scientist) proposed 150 years ago for which he had NO PROOF whatsoever!

Great idea!"

Indeed. Such a great idea was Darwin's theories, that he published his findings in a book called "On the Origin of Species". Since then, Paleontology and Archaeology/Anthropology has been refined and taken great strides since then, especially with everything found since then that, with every subsequent discovery, makes Darwin's claims less & less a theory.

It's now looking more & more like Darwin's Facts of Evolution.

Archaeoperyx. Tiktaalik. And just last year: Darwinius massilae. Ardipithecus. The 'Missing' links found.

"I'm trying to help you guys to understand that what you believe is a fairy tale just like the three stories I posted. Your theory is not only religious, it is not only un-scientific, it is ANTI-scientific! You have no choice but to believe what has been disproven CENTURIES ago!"

Look for an aircraft hangar, Jonathan. The biggest you can find. It still wouldn't be big enough to hold the shitloads of evidence for Evolution. What do you fundies have to prove Creation? A book. And... that's it.

"it is not only un-scientific, it is ANTI-scientific!"

Genesis in the Bible? How right you are.

old comment by lisamariefan

I'm trying to help you guys to understand that what you believe is a fairy tale just like the three stories I posted. Your theory is not only religious, it is not only un-scientific, it is ANTI-scientific! You have no choice but to believe what has been shown to be unreasonable ago! Why? I think it's because you don't want to admit there is not a God because if you do, you might lose your excuse to be a douchenozzle. Oh no! We don't like that idea! I know! Let's just all bury our heads in the sand and buy into this book about Jesus (who's story isn't even consistent) written thousands of years ago for which there is NO PROOF whatsoever!

Fix'd

Jonathan Wetsel #fundie osu.facebook.com

35 comments

Confused?