Christ detained by Satan 6 centuries prior being Jesus?!

I wonder why nobody wants to address the detention of Christ with the 'king of Persia'?

Read this first (short masterpiece reading):

Thread: BOMBSHELL: Christ was on earth before being Jesus!

Dan 10:13

But the prince of the Persian kingdom resisted me twenty-one days. Then Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me, because I was detained there with the king of Persia.

Christ was detained WITH the 'king of Persia', together, as stated in Dan 10:13.

Except that history never reported such detention of the king of Persia which was Cyrus the Great at the moment Christ met Daniel.

[link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)]

Why did the prince of the Persian kingdom resist Christ 21 days?

What could the word 'resist' means?

Who was the prince of the Persian kingdom at the time of Cyrus?

The son of Cyrus the Great was Cambyses II.

[link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)]

Bardiya is said to be an imposter who ruled few months.

[link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)]

20 So he said, “Do you know why I have come to you? Soon I will return to fight against the prince of Persia, and when I go, the prince of Greece will come;

This is not the king but the prince of Persia that Christ would fight against.

Why would Christ fight Cambyses II in the End Times supposedly being the moment Christ returns to defeat Satan.

Who else could Christ fight against?

Is the Son of God involved in minor fights against minor princes?

There is another version that could well be the real one.

Nebbuchadnezzar was the king of Babylon who invaded Israel and subdued its king who was deported to Babylon. Daniel was a noble from the royal Israelite family. He wrote his book from Babylon in captivity. He cites Nebbuchadnezzar and Belshazzar, son of Nabonidus.

In Daniel's book, some kings are missing between Nebbuchadnezzar/Belshazzar of Babylon and Cyrus the Great, then Darius I, of Persia. These missing kings are:

[link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)]

Amel-Marduk
Nergal-shar-usur
Labashi-Marduk

and Nabonidus, particularly known with the Nabonidus Chronicle.

[link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)]

Nabonidus was king and father of Belshazzar cited by Daniel in Dan 8 as king of Babylon, instead of his father Nabonidus!

Why is Nabonidus forgotten?

While the three first kings after Nebbuchadnezzar (42 years of reign) ruled only for 4 years (3 kings in four years), Nabonidus, having left the capital for a long period, ruled
17 years through his son Belshazzar, staying in Babylon, for a while.

Wikipedia says about Nabonidus: Last Mesopotamian king of Babylon, originated in Harran in Assyria. Was not a Chaldean, often left rule to his son Belshazzar.

So, remember that Nabonidus was the last king of Babylon before the invasion of the Persian king Cyrus the Great while Daniel was in captivity in Babylon.

In the page of Wikipedia about Cyrus we can read this:

[link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)]

It is probable that Cyrus engaged in negotiations with the Babylonian generals to obtain a compromise on their part and therefore avoid an armed confrontation. Nabonidus was staying in the city at the time and soon fled to the capital, Babylon, which he had not visited in years.[62]

Two days later, on October 7 (proleptic Gregorian calendar), Gubaru's troops entered Babylon, again without any resistance from the Babylonian armies, and detained Nabonidus.

Here is more about Nabonidus:

[link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)]

HERE WE ARE!

WE HAVE A KING DETAINED IN CYRUS' PERIOD. IT HAPPENS THAT CYRUS WAS MADE KING OF BABYLON AFTER NABONIDUS' REIGN!

On October 29, Cyrus himself entered the city of Babylon and detained Nabonidus.
.../...

After taking Babylon, Cyrus the Great proclaimed himself "king of Babylon, king of Sumer and Akkad, king of the four corners of the world" in the famous Cyrus cylinder, an inscription deposited in the foundations of the Esagila temple dedicated to the chief Babylonian god, Marduk.

What the links provided say is that Nabonidus has been downplayed by the Babylonians priests of Marduk and Cyrus himself, considered as a Messiah in Isaiah's texts by the Jews.

NABONIDUS HAS UNDERGONE A SMEAR PROPAGANDA BY THE ONE SEEN AS A MESSIAH BY THE JEWS.

IS IT THE REASON FOR THE CONFUSION BETWEEN THE PRINCE OF PERSIA - IN FACT CYRUS THE GREAT NOT KING OF BABYLON YET - AND THE KING OF 'PERSIA' WHO WOULD BE IN FACT THE KING OF BABYLON - INSTEAD OF PERSIA - DETAINED BY CYRUS...WITH CHRIST?

THIS GIVES US A VERY NEW VISION OF CHRIST DETAINED WITH NABONIDUS, KING OF BABYLON (NOT PERSIA) BY CYRUS - THE PRINCE OF PERSIA - WHO THEN IS IN FACT SATAN INCARNATED...REVERED BY THE JEWS FOR HIS DECISION TO SET THE JEWS FREE!

The point now to understand is why the Jews mistranslated Babylon for Persia. Is it to follow orders from Cyrus the Great to better hide the presence of Christ with Nabonidus in prison because of Cyrus WHO WOULD BE THE PRINCE OF PERSIA WHOM CHRIST WILL FIGHT AT THE END TIMES AND RESISTED CHRIST 21 DAYS?

ONLY A SUPERNATURAL BEING COULD RESIST CHRIST'S POWER. THIS COULD ONLY BE CHRIST, UNFORTUNATELY DETAINED WITH NABONIDUS!

In case I wasn't clear enough, the point is that:

1) the Prince of Persia was Cyrus the Great, KING OF PERSIA. He resisted Christ for 21 days. Cyrus the Great was actually Satan that Christ must fight in the End Times.

2) the King of Persia was Nabonidus, actually KING OF BABYLON. He was actually detained by Cyrus the Great just before the latter become King of Babylon. The detention with a king that Christ speaks about is therefore REAL.

3) The mistranslations - king of Persia instead of King of Babylon (Nabonidus) as well as Prince of Persia instead of King of Persia (Cyrus the Great) - reflects a purposedly smear campaign against Nabonidus by Cyrus the Great seen as Messiah by the Jews through Isaiah's words, to better confuse the readers and make Nabonidus forgotten.

4) Since Christ was detained by Cyrus the Great WITH Nabonidus, King of Babylon, it means that Christ was incarnated BEFORE being Jesus for the detention necessarily occured on the physical plane!

5) the point 4 above explains why the angel Michael had to set Christ free. Christ should have been abducted by an angel - only supporter of Christ at that time according to his own words - and freed from his incarnated body (Daniel saw him in his glorious body in Dan 10) like Christ was freed from Jesus' body when John saw Christ in Rev 1.

6) the abduction of Christ should have occured like the ones reported in numerous cases of angels' interventions as stated in this thread:

Thread: The RAPTURE is UFO related.

7) Christ's incarnation in Daniel's time remains a mystery...but should be related to Nabonidus' detention. Who was Christ (incarnated) to the King of Babylon? One clue lies in the mysterious and supernatural handwriting on the wall in Dan 5 intended to Belshazzar, Nabonidus' son:

25 “This is the inscription that was written:

mene, mene, tekel, parsin

26 “Here is what these words mean:

Mene: God has numbered the days of your reign and brought it to an end.

27 Tekel: You have been weighed on the scales and found wanting.

28 Peres: Your kingdom is divided and given to the Medes and Persians.”

30 That very night Belshazzar, king of the Babylonians, was slain,

31 and Darius the Mede took over the kingdom, at the age of sixty-two.

Here we see how historically wrong is this last verse for the new king of Babylon was Cyrus, NOT Darius who came well after Cyrus the Great almost ten years later after two other kings.

The same way, Belshazzar is presented as the son of Nebbuchadnezzar instead of Nabonidus in Dan 5.

Again an attempt to dismiss Nabonidus and confuse the readers.

I believe Christ being close to Nabonidus who was far from his son. One must ask why...