[Well, if you are a man of sufficient quality to attract a women for marriage and participate in creating and raising offspring, why would you care what two homosexual neighbours are doing?]
Well, if you are a man of sufficient quality to attract a women for
marriage and participate in creating and raising offspring, why would
you care what a man and a 10-year old girl are doing.?
50 comments
"Well, if you are a man of sufficient quality to attract a women for
marriage and participate in creating and raising offspring, why would
you care what a man and a 10-year old girl are doing.? "
Because the "man" in that relationship is most likely taking advantage of the girl. It is almost guaranteed that he would be exploiting her lack of experience, made easier by a culturally reinforced sense of obedience towards authority figures instilled in her. Then, factor in her lack of knowledge pertaining to sexual affairs, the fact that she has yet to form an opinion on sexual matters, that she has little ability to weigh the consequences of getting into such situations, and that she would have little to no way of fending off his advances if she wished to refuse him. The final result is that you do not have a partnership as much as a victimization.
What part of "two consenting adults" do fundies not get?
Edit: LOL! Too slow. Apparently channeled Lord Jiro (and Mister Spak).
Ok, see here's the thing. Option one is two consenting adults. Option two is one adult and one child too young to know what's really going on. Sorry, but your analogy isn't quite right. Option one hurts no one. Option two hurts a young girl. Hence I care about option two.
It's fine for two consenting adults to have sex, regardless of gender. It's none of your business.
If a man is having sex with a 10-year-old, she cannot consent and it's more likely to be rape, or the man taking advantage.
Your attempt at an argument sucks. You fail.
Did he just conflate homosexuality with pedophilia, there?
Okay, the difference is, the 10-y.o. girl is *harmed* -- scarred for life.
Comparing molestation of children to an act of love between two adults, regardless of gender, accomplishes nothing. They are not the same thing. A 10 year old is a child, not legally an adult, an innocent. Two adults make a conscious decision to do what they do.
Why do you have to attempt to compare apples and oranges? And why do fundies go off the deep end so often when doing so?
Because those two homosexual neighbors are more likely to be consenting adults who are in a loving relationship. The relationship between the man and 10-year-old girl is that of abuse. She is underage and he is clearly manipulating and abusing her. It could be compared to a husband beating his wife. I would care because he is abusing her. They're both heterosexual and they're both above age, but it's the simple factor of abuse that would concern me.
Child rape is quite different from a consentual relationship between adults.
If you don't know that, I can call child protective services now.
Going back to the contract thing......
Why is it legal to enter into a binding contract with an adult homosexual and not a 10-year-old girl? Because the 10-year-old is not old enough to make an informed decision.
And why do fundie minds always go straight to molesting little girls, you are a bunch of sick fucking twats, you know that?
"Well, if you are a man of sufficient quality to attract a women for
marriage and participate in creating and raising offspring, why would
you care what a man and a 10-year old girl are doing.?"
Leave Jimmy Savile out of it.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.