What is valid about the Big Bang??? I see nothing valid to it. Where is the evidence??? The Big Bang would be a little bit more convincing if it actually had more than just evidence based on how light enters the telescope, but fortunately it doesn't have anymore evidence than this.
19 comments
The Big Bang is actually a fairly plausible theory. How else does one account for the red shift? How else does one account for the fact that all objects in the universe are moving away from one another? The universe is expanding, and all the objects in it were presumably closer to one another once.
The Big Bang isn't really so much a violent explosion as it is the flinging of matter in all directions.
Beacuse everything coming into exsistence in 6 days,god rested on the 7th wiped out i guess from making things it will just destroy anyway,out of nowhere without explaination makes plausible sense for impeccable dummies like yourself.
@Tempus
Thankie! Going to try it...(wait for it)...NOW!
Well...
That didn't fucking work.
I hate the internets.
Trying again:
image
It worked! I love you, internets!
'Nother question: Is it legal? Can I do what I just did? I mean, obviously I can (I just did thanks to Tempus!) but should I?
I am not a physicist, or any kind of scientist. But I trust that they know what they are doing, all I learned about it during my years in school made sense. They don't have to explain it directly to me, for me to accept it. I would probably not understand anyway.
Creating the whole world out of nothing in six days, however, does not make sense.
Plus, you can see evolution working every day. We have a stomach flu here, that used to break out during wintertime. Now the breakouts won't stop, even though it's not winter any more. The virus or bacteria have obviously evolved into something that works better for them.
Well it does have validity. A very small percent of scientists are persueing the big bang theory. Even Hawking won't completely stand behind the current theory, that's why he's working on the Grand Unifying Theory that he hopes may (theoretically) explain it better
Most say, "screw it, the universe is here and follows certain laws, let's figure out what we have now" (I'm paraphrasing)
In other words: Quit trying to shoehorn the Big Bang into other sciences like Evolution. Stay on topic! If your best argument for something is an argument against something unrelated you loose immediately.
Hovind tatics are unrecognized, unrelated, unsupported and imagined misplaced arguments or
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
