The chickens are coming home to roost..
My prediction is, in the future, women will finally succeed in creating the ‘utopia’ that they have been trying to build for themselves.
They will be nothing more than prey, or perhaps slaves. The only protection they will have will be whomever considers them property.
Why bother protecting a woman when you will get vilified and have your life destroyed?
Why bother having a relationship with a woman when it leads to nothing but either imprisonment for claimed ‘rape’ or slavery for the rest of your life to pay her bills?
why bother seeking a prostitute to have your needs met when it leads inexorably to a prison sentence?
Why bother asking a woman when it is much easier and safer to simply have your way with her and then sink her body in the bay?
45 comments
The chickens are coming home to roost..
My prediction is, in the future, women will finally succeed in creating the utopia’ that they have been trying to build for themselves.
They will be nothing more than prey, or perhaps slaves. The only protection they will have will be whomever considers them property.
So, no different from the past 10,000 years or so, in other words?
What he is saying is that Chivalry always sucked because horses were made to suffer - and romantic artists should have stuck with Greek porn.
TXT talk is anti intellectual and should be banned from serious robust adult discussions.
Max - he'll never draw the chicks like you can.
Somebody will hopefully sink your sad ass body in the bay one of these days.
BTW, why does seeking a prostitute lead to a jail sentence? I've done it more than a few times (back in my single days, I hasten to add) and I've never been locked up for it.
And that right there is what we like to call a fuckton of red flags. If this is the way you think then it's really no wonder no woman that isn't pure evil will give you the time of day.
Fret not, however, as prison shall provide for your blue balls via an utterly destroyed asshole. Perhaps living as a sociopath's sex toy will give you some more realistic perspective on your attitude towards women.
"Why bother asking a woman when it is much easier and safer to simply have your way with her and then sink her body in the bay?"
*GAG!* Fuck MRAs and their hateful bile and their pretensions of being anything other than a bunch of bitter basement-dwelling internet tough guys. I hope the SPLC doxes them and sends the information plus screencaps of their quotes to their employers and local police departments; so they get fired, blacklisted, and prevented from interacting from society ever again! Better that than some innocent woman getting murdered.
So, you finally raped at least one woman because she didn't want to have sex with you or didn't put out fast enough to suit you, and then she put your ass in jail, and now your fucked-up, registered-sex- offender life is all her fault, right?
So the only way you can get a woman to have sex with you is to rape her and that's the fault of the women's movement? Oh, that's right, in your ideal world women would be obligated to "service" any man who requested it.
@Justanotheratheist: Patronizing a prostitute is a crime in every part of the US except certain counties of Nevada. In NYS, it's a class A misdemeanor (assuming the prostitute is of legal age), and can result in up to 4 months imprisonment; penalties doubtless vary by state, but that's a fairly good starting point.
A decent chunk of the feminist movement(s) wants to legalize prostitution, another decent chunk wants to adopt the Swedish approach (no penalties for prostitutes, but high penalties for pimps and johns -- the essential presumption being that prostitution is intrinsically victimizing (the fact that a substantial fraction of prostitutes are out-and-out enslaved is certainly a factor here), and so prostitutes should be treated as victims rather than offenders), and another decent chunk has no strong opinions on prostitution at all.
Of course, in the eyes of the "manosphere," this complex internal debate gets simplified to "feminists want to jail men who pay for sex because doing so is a cheaper alternative to the financial slavery of marriage."
@Tempus, Reynardine: So inadequate (but existent) rights and a high (but well below 100%) risk of violation are indistinguishable to you from total law of the jungle outside of naked chattel slavery? Western society (along with the vast majority of others) has a long history of treating women very badly, but hyperbole helps no one.
My prediction is, in the future, women will finally succeed in creating the utopia’ that they have been trying to build for themselves.
They will be nothing more than prey, or perhaps slaves. The only protection they will have will be whomever considers them property.
And that would be new how? That's the way it was for thousands of years, and precisely what feminists want to get away from.
Why bother having a relationship with a woman when it leads to nothing but either imprisonment for claimed rape’ or slavery for the rest of your life to pay her bills?
Slavery? Is love an unfathomable concept to you? Plus, women work too nowadays.
And it's difficult enough to get a rape conviction even if rape actually occurred, women "crying rape" AND getting a successful conviction are extremely rare.
why bother seeking a prostitute to have your needs met when it leads inexorably to a prison sentence?
Get over yourself and learn to masturbate. Sex is not a need.
Why bother asking a woman when it is much easier and safer to simply have your way with her and then sink her body in the bay?
Please turn yourself in to the FBI right now, maybe you'll get a lighter sentence if you just confess.
"My prediction is.."
Well, you suck at making predictions because your misogyny is clouding your 'vision'.
I don't recall seeing any women attempting to build a utopia for themselves either (as if a utopia without men would exist :P )
Well, Christopher, the "rights" you speak of were the father's, to preserve the goods he was offering in undamaged condition until he could make a lawful transfer, and then the bridegroom's to receive them so and to keep them exclusively his. As for unowned women or those of low social rank, please check on droit du seigneur, cunnilage, and toussage.
LET HELL EXIST SO THIS BASTARD CAN ROT IN IT. LET HIS TESTICLES BE RAINED ON BY ACID,HIS BRAIN TURNED TO MUSH THEN RESTORED, HIS EYEBALLS PLUCKED OUT EVERYDAY, HIS HEART REMOVED WITH NO DAMAGE AND HIS EARS FORCED TO HEAR NICKLEBACK FOR ALL ETERNITY!
@Christopher
I was thinking more of the "massage parlour/escort agency" scenario. Everyone knows exactly what those really are, and I can vouch for it.
If you know what I mean (nudge nudge, wink wink).
Women are creating a "utopia" in which they are slaves? What the fuck, son.
I get the feeling that someone should check if this guy has actually "sunk" women in the bay.
Phew! It's a good job your father didn't have his way with your mother before sinking her body in the bay otherwise you would have reached the grand old age of -9 months old and never celebrated your 1st birthday. Though of course, being -9 months old you would have been a better swimmer than both your parents.
Hey Kamism, feminism is just the notion that women are people. If you can't tell the difference between that and a bunch of entitled manchildren whining for fucktoy slaves, then you're really fucking stupid.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.