Lubbock #fundie

Lubbock #fundie freeconservatives.com

I'll tell you exactly how I would put an end to Muslim Terror --and I wouldn't have to kill them all:

I would use conventiontional weapons --Bunker Busters would probably be a good choice, and I would bomb the hell out of Medina.

When the dust settled, I would point my finger at the Muslim Street, and I would say, "Now, you murderous bastards. Muslim Terror ends today. Right here and right now. You set off one more terrorist attack anywhere in this world. ANYWHERE. Any continent, and city. You kill just ONE more innocent in the name of Allah --just one, and I hit Mecca with a nuke. If you murderous bastards want to have a place to Haj to, if you want to save Mecca, then the killing stops here and now."

131 comments

old comment by Higgs Boson

What you are suggesting is almost guaranteed to cause an overwhelming uprising of vicious, bloodthirsty anger in not only the most extreme elements of the Muslim world, but also among Muslims who would otherwise be more than happy to live and let live. This chest-beating nonsense is nothing more than shallow and rather sinister bravado from someone who actually perceives there to be virtue and honour in the willingness to cause destruction and death on other people.

Can you think of any other group of people who are driven by a macho desire to prove their power and righteousness to everyone by visiting grotesque violence upon the world? I can, and you won't like me comparing you to them.

The conviction that it is a sign of virtue to demonstrate our power and dominance over other groups with violence is one of our most primitive and retrograde traits, and one that if not domesticated, will guarantee that human history is soaked in blood for its entire existence.

old comment by

I don't care what anybody says, this would be awsome because,
1. They want to kill alot of people (infadels) and they don't even try to make it a secret.
2. ALOT OF THE WORLD IS FULL OF "INFADELS"!!!
3. (Using logic and reasoning) There are no gods of any sort so killing in the name of one is frigin retarded and shouldn't be tolerated.
4. They won't bother us anymore if you KILL ALL OF THEM!!!
5. It's not stupid terrorism, like everyone is saying, if you're sticking up for yourself and other countries because of some stupid ass religion!!! it's like being attacked by a dog and you have pepper spray but don't want to use it because you don't want the near by residentials to think bad about you!!! C'MON are you guys sure YOU'RE not the fundimentalists

old comment by Saladin

Don't forget about the part where you totally beat up that bully who put your head in a toilet in high school, and in doing so impress that girl who dumped you so much that she wants you back, but you decide that you don't want her anymopre (even though you've done nothing but cry and masturbate since she (or possibly he) dumped you) because you just won 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 dollars and Carmen Electra has decided that she wants to have your babies. Anything else I left out of your delusional fantasy land?

Also, internet tough guy is tough on teh internet. I dare you to try your bullshit in real life. I fucking dare you. You certainly wouldn't have the right to call anyone a terrorist or a murdering bastard, since you would've taken the prize for both. Fuckers like you make me sick.

old comment by dionysus

I would use conventiontional weapons --Bunker Busters would probably be a good choice, and I would bomb the hell out of Medina.

And then an army of over 1 billion Muslims comes to invade your country, captures you, and pulls you apart piece by piece while pouring sulfuric acid on your wounds. And nobody comes to help you because you're a psychotic mass-murderer that's a threat to humanity.

EDIT:

Holy fuck! I just read the thread and it's terrifying how many people agree with this guy's stupid suggestion!

old comment by Jamaican Castle

Mmkay, you do that, Tarkin-wannabe. We'll see how it turns out:

a) Medina, for those of you keeping score at home, is in Saudi Arabia, i.e., the country we suck up to because they've got oil. Somehow I can't imagine even non-Muslim Saudis will react well to us bombing their sovereign territory.

b) Unpopular as the war is right now, we ain't seen nothing yet. Even in Vietnam we never glassed an entire city. All the vaguely-anti-war people are demonstrating, all the vaguely-pro-Muslim people are demonstrating, and all the people pissed off about skyrocketing gas prices are... yeah. Riots, I expect.

c) Terrorists aren't actually beholden to protect the cities in question, unlike, say, a national government would be. Who's to say that threatening Mecca will actually faze them in the slightest?

All of which is ignoring how the rest of the world will react. Or how the US government and military would respond to orders to commit mass murder for no clearly defined goal.

Remember, ideas are bulletproof - and that includes the other side's ideas. Inconvenient, isn't it?

old comment by UnoQuePasaba

I love how this guys who believe in some kind of beardy vengeful sociopath thinks that the world is a '80 arnie's movie.
Dude, think about it. If some muslim do the exact same thing, bomb the hell out of new york and say pointing his finger at you. "Now, you infidel piece of shit. Your corrupt world that offend Allah ends today. If you..blablabla..", (you get my point), What would you do? Stay at home and say, "fair enough, they can nuke us" or fight it any way you can? The answer should enlighten you.
Anyways, Do you think "Muslim Street" is just terrorist? They are innocent people, How can you command to stop killing innocent while killing innocent in the other side?

Since I discovered this site all I can think is that all this people is BROKEN.

old comment by J

First of all, that book you thump prevents you from doing that. How a about "Thou shall not kill"? And Jesus expressed dissaproval of "An eye for an eye". Completley destroying an entire city is way worse than "An eye for an eye."
Second of all, That wouldn't work. As soon as you started bombing Medina, the Saudi Government would rally an army to fight us, as well as all of out troops stationed there, and cut of our oil supply. With no Saudi oil coming to America, our economy would go down the crapper and we'd have no money to fund our war in Saudi Arabia, let alone out current wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. It wouldn't be too long before terrorrists, as well as other Muslim nations started entering the war on the Saudi side, and all three wars would converge into WWIII, which America(as well as our allies Germany, Israel, Canada, and Britan) would have no money to fund, and the Islamic Extremeists would win, resulting in the fall of western civilization.
But what would I know? I'm just a stupid liberal.

old comment by Anon2

Meanwhile, in a cave in Afghanistan or in a camp in the Gaza strip:

"I'll tell you exactly how I would put an end to the aggression of the USA --and I wouldn't have to kill them all:

I would use a dirty bomb -- old radioactives from medical radiation therapy would probably be a good choice, and I would first scare the hell out of a major US city.

When the dust settled, I would point my finger at Wall Street, and I would say, "Now, you murderous bastards. Christian Terror ends today. Right here and right now. You set off one more murderous attack anywhere in this world. ANYWHERE. Any continent, and city. You kill just ONE more innocent in the name of Jesus --just one, and I hit New York City with a real nuke. If you murderous bastards want to have a place where to do your dirty business deals, if you want to save NYC, then the killing stops here and now."

See, "Lubbock"? You are exactly on the same moral level as your opponents.

Lubbock #fundie freeconservatives.com

131 comments

Confused?