Here we go again. First: Make same sex marriage the law of the state. Second: Outlaw hetrosexual marriage. Third: Punish hetrosexual sex with burning at the stake. This would even things between those who believe in freedom and those who believe in myths and superstition. Result would be: Substantial reduction in population. Second: It would nearly eliminate education underfunding. Third: Housing costs would be reduced. Forth: Those countries who do not adopt these policies will destruct and make the US king of the hill again. Defencse rests.
74 comments
Wait, so what you are saying is that the liberals and gays are in cahoots to get gay marriage passed so that it would make hetrosexual marriages and relationships look abnormal so that they reproduce less and with less people there is less a need in government spending on people and more money around to build a defense to crush countries that resist this new program?
Okaay. Tell me, who do you see every month to talk about your anxieties? I think I need a word with that person.
Here we go again. First: Make miscegenation the law of the state. Second: Outlaw same-race marriage. Third: Punish same-race sex with burning at the stake. This would even things between those who believe in freedom and those who believe in myths and superstition. Result would be: Substantial reduction in population. Second: It would nearly eliminate education underfunding. Third: Housing costs would be reduced. Forth: Those countries who do not adopt these policies will destruct and make the US king of the hill again. Defencse rests.
Same shit, different decade.
Here we go again. First: Make same sex marriage the law of the state. Second: Outlaw heterosexual marriage. Third: Punish heterosexual sex with burning at the stake.
Slippery Slope fallacy. Fail. Although, I detect a hint of sarcasm in this whole post.
Were it up to me, there would be no such thing as 'legal marriage'. People would live with who they want and get all those rights just for being a pair, regardless of if they choose to do a ceremony or not.
Wot? Uh, no.
@Efrain: LMAO
Uh, excuse me but NO ONE has seriously suggested outlawing heterosexual marriage or burning heterosexuals. Take your meds, have a cup of warm milk and have a nice lie down. You'll feel better tomorrow.
So what happens if I just take step one and skip to the conclusion? I get:
Make same sex marriage the law of the state --> make the US king of the hill again.
Did he really mean to torture his logic so badly that it said something he didn't mean it to?
First: Make same sex marriage the law of the state. Second: Outlaw heterosexual marriage. Third: Punish heterosexual sex with burning at the stake. Fourth: Kill children and eat their eyeballs. Fifth: Cut the top off your mother's skull and have sex with her brain. Sixth ...
-- or --
First: Make same sex marriage the law of the state. Second: STFU about it and worry about your own damn marriage.
First: EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW.
Second: Not a bad idea -- if we can't have marriage, neither should you, as it confers special rights and privileges under Federal law. (Now go back and look at point one.)
Three: Yes, punish people for doing what comes naturally. That makes -so- much sense....
I'm just not touching the rest of this. It's toxic-level crazy.
Who wants to outlaw heterosexual relationships?
It would never work, anyway, seeing as heterosexuals are the majority.
Hey, retard... There's a reason why homosexuals aren't commonly found in nature. It's not "contagious". They can't reproduce, therefore the genetic causes that would incline one towards homosexuality don't get passed on. So, there will never be a majority of homosexuals. Duh...
"First: Make same sex marriage the law of the state. Second: Outlaw hetrosexual marriage. Third: Punish hetrosexual sex with burning at the stake."
Oh, just give it a rest...
This is no different than men assuming that feminists want to dominate them. Or that the goal of the atheists is to round up and slaughter all Christians.
Just because it's what YOU'VE enjoyed having the power to do for thousands of years, doesn't mean we share your ambitions. It is our utmost endeavor to NOT have brains that messed up.
OK
Make something called, say, "civil partnership" exclusively secular, and open to heterosexual and homosexual couples, but one that DOES attract all the benefits.
Make it so that one cannot be bith married and civil partnered.
See which becomes the norm.
Except that even with in vitro and the like, such an idiotic course of action would kill off the human race.
Some people are gay. Most people are straight. We're OK with that. Some gay people want to marry the person with whom they're in a committed romantic relationship, just like straight people do. And we're OK with that too.
This one is having lurid Religio-S&M fantasies. Quick, open the First Book of Bondage and read from the 3rd chapter - y'know, the place where the rampant, unholy dildoes are called up from hell by the AC and the DC to rape all True Christian men (up the ass, of course) and women.
Isn't there a Chick tract about this? If not, perhaps he should invent it.
LOL.
seriously...
Third: Punish hetrosexual sex with burning at the stake.
What!? No no no, every True Christian knows that the gay overlords selected impalement as their method of execution of choice. True, burning at the stake seemed promising as a way to make the victim flaming, but the effect turned out to be too short-lived. [/tinfoil]
It hasn't worked that way here, or any other state that has it. A friend from college is gay and married. That hasn't forced the breakup of my parents, who are still married. There's a rubber room with your name on it.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
