The article admits it does not know what Trump will do, but we do know that Hillary voted in favor of the Iraq war; let Ambassador Stevens get murdered; gave the Russians her Big Red Reset Button and then watched them overrun Crimea and half the Ukraine; and pushed the attack that resulted in the death of Libya’s strongman Moammar Ghaddafi, leaving that country to ISIL. Trump MIGHT be dangerous, but we KNOW Hillary is a bloody disaster

Bremmer's a neoliberal "beta male" geopolitical high priest trying to make Trump look like the global aggressor when we all know the Bush/Clinton/Obama neoliberal dynasties have been the worst aggressors post Cold War.

How many nations have been bombed into submission in the name of democracy, humanitarianism, liberalism, freedom? Exactly! Furthermore, under the 8 year Obama Clinton/Kerry administration, some might call it "regime", we've seen tensions & wars rage from the Arctic, Ukraine, Syria (in fact the entire Middle East & parts of North Africa) South China Seas, North Korea, Russia & China.

Trump is the geopolitical balance America needs between Sanders who would turn the US into Venezuela and Clinton who would trigger all-out nuclear conflict with either Russia, China, North Korea. Trump wants to do "multipolar world order" business with Russia, China, India et al not trigger nuclear war. Trump wants to bring troops home, lowering the risks of conflict. This is poor liberally bias analysis typical of Ian Bremmer, a beta male soon deemed to be irreleveant.