[Fundies are discussing why most scientists are atheists.]
20 comments
Oh yes, it's all about you, isn't it? Science is being done? They must be trying to disprove your particular deity. As opposed to actually learning something important, a concept you may be unfamiliar with given your writing abilities.
" They are falling into there own believes and try make it look good and evidential and interesting to the world, to blind them from the truth"
the more scientists pushes God out of the picture...
God isn't even in the picture as far as I can tell.
they are trying to disprove something to big for them to disprove.
So where is the evidence then?
Now, now... don't assume English is Richie's primary language.
The UK in his name might not mean United Kingdom, might mean Upper Kyrgyzstan or something.
>> scientists <<
He made it plural! And spelled it correctly. If he wasn't misusing it, I'd call "Poe".
But then there's everything else.
Did you folks know some fundie leaders have suggested science should be reigned in and controlled and those that decide what needs to be restricted should be highly religious.
Not just noise from the pulpit, political advocates like Huckabee, Sharpton, Perry, Sontorum, Bachman and more.
This belief is based on no evidence of science running rampant and violating common core values. No, this is based on the Mad Scientist stereotype present in science fiction and that is only based on a the fact that if you want massive havoc a scientist is more capable of doing that then Billy-Bob and his baseball bat.
Yet what brand of havoc do we see more?
The truth is where grammar and spelling resides. Nowhere effing near you, in other words. I seriously hope that the UK in your username doesn't mean United Kingdom. That would be very embarrassing, for you. If you were brought up in an English-speaking culture, how come you're miles behind a Swede, who didn't start learning English until her 9th year? Sure, I've known English now for 35 years; most of my life. But you ought to have known it for ALL of your life, dearie.
Scientists are only trying to understand the world, and they follow wherever the evidence leads. If evidence leads away from some deity or other, it's not the evidence's fault, but the deity's.
I've found the real depths of illiteracy are found almost exclusively in native speakers; if English was Richie's second language, he'd be making different mistakes. "I'm still learning" mistakes are generally identifiable as such (Sherlock Holmes used this technique to identify the native tongue of a suspect in "A Study In Scarlet", I think), but "I don't give a shit how this language is meant to work" mistakes can be anything and are almost always by native speakers.
Basically, if you've consciously tried to actually learn something, you're less likely to make such extreme mistakes in such basic syntax so often.
Then again, something tells me Richie has never consciously tried to actually learn anything.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
