Only Pokemon evolve, evolution is a fairy tale for adults...Darwin himself said the most obvious and damaging argument against his theory is the lack of transitional fossils, if evolution happened transitional fossils WOULD outnumber fully formed fossils. If it took lets say a million years for a lizard to change into a bird it would have a million years to form a fossil while it was changing, while it had partly developed wings or growing feathers or a beak....If animals were evolving for millions of years that would mean that most of the animals that were on earth were transitional, but we only have fossils of fully formed animals of distinct types. There are no part bird part lizard, or part fish part lizard. Go look on wikipedia's transitional fossils page, you'll see a few fossils of fully formed animals then a bunch of drawings of what a transitional animal WOULD look like. If your theory was correct then 99% of our fossils would be partly formed animals but they aren't....Also if you try and say I don't understand what a transitional fossil would be, go check wiki they have a drawing of a fish that is obviously part fish part reptile....But no fossils of these creatures undergoing change?