A) To call baby murderers "people" is a huge stretch. People have basic moral decency and humanity. Baby murderers, on the other hand, are psychopaths with no empathy and no conscience who are far more akin to inhuman monsters than they are to people.
B) Stating facts is not "insults." On the other hand, you calling babies "not persons" in order to "justify" murdering them is the gravest of insults to the hundreds of billions of babies who have been and will continue be brutally & barbarically murdered in the 'abortion' holocaust for which you advocate.
15 comments
"calling babies "not persons" in order to "justify" murdering them"
Once again: it's NOT so that egg is fertilized - SPJONK - egg instantly morphs into a microscopic version of a newborn.
"hundreds of billions of babies"
Navaros: "I *AM* serious! AND STOP CALLING ME SHIRLEY!!!"
Hosea 13:16.
Therefore your 'God' is an inferior subhuman.
You said it, we didn't, Navvy.
Let's deal with observable FACTS, Navaros, shall we? The FACT (1) remains that your definition of a baby as including blastocysts and fetuses is not universally held, but has many, many millions of people who do not think that. The FACT (2) is that those who agree with you do so because of what religion tells them. (Not the bible, no. The bible doesn't care. That is an INTERPRETATION made by pastors.) But the FACT (3) is that religion can freely be chosen in any civilized society, so there is no reason to assume that you should have the right to dictate policies to those who do not share your religion.
In other words, stuff that opinion.
A) To call pro-lifers "people" is a huge stretch. People have basic moral decency and humanity. Pro-lifers, on the other hand, are psychopaths with no empathy and no conscience who are far more akin to inhuman monsters than they are to people.
B) Stating facts is not "insults." On the other hand, you calling wpmen "not persons" in order to "justify" murdering them is the gravest of insults to the hundreds of billions of wwomen who have been and will continue be brutally & barbarically murdered in the 'pro-life' holocaust for which you advocate.
Calling doctors who perform abortion services "baby murderers" is a huge stretch. And calling abortions "baby murders" to justify wanting to outlaw the procedure is the gravest of insults to those women who decide they can't handle a pregnancy.
If you really want to save those "babies," then why don't you adopt them all? There might be fewer abortions if you people would try to help poor mothers and push for reducing adoption fees, not to mention making contraception free and easily available.
"A) To call baby murderers "people" is a huge stretch."
A) to call dots babies is a stretch Reed Richards couldn't do.
B) everything that follows from that premise is a fail.
A) Exactly! People (those who actually care about human beings, aka us) have basic moral decency and humanity. But those who think that a person's life stops being relevant once it has exited the womb, aka the "pro-lifers" aren't. They are psychopaths with no empathy and no conscience who don't care about the rights of women as people. Only as baby makers. And then they dare to try to present themselves as having the moral high ground so they can justify their atrocious behavior while in reality being massive hypocrites.
B) Then by all means, stop insulting us and start stating actual facts. And in case you're too dumb to know, a fact is: fetus =/= baby.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
