Mr Wrong is at it again. The brain disease is "regressivism", dearie; that's the one disrupting more for society.
The current common law precept is that no man ought to even want to rape his wife, or be able to.
What disastrous effect do you imagine from you having to please your wife, as wives have always had to please their husbands? Are you a special little snowflake and ought to get what you want, just because? You do know that that puts you in the same mental maturity as the average three-year-old, right?
I'd say that no-fault divorces are better. Before, one party (usually the husband) pretended to have an affair, while (knowingly) being followed by a spy, and the couple got the divorce they wanted. Now, neither has to pretend and lie to get the divorce. Most divorces are, after all, more or less amicable; the parties have decided they don't belong together and want to go their separate ways.
Contraception has always been around, silly-nilly. If anything else was available, people have abstained during ovulation, or practiced coitus interruptus.
Christian teaching has, for the last four hundred years or so, been at a constant odds with both wisdom, experience and science.