[the Big Bang is the scientific theory that the Universe emerged from an enormously dense and hot state about 13.7 billion years ago]
what does dense mean? does it mean matter existed there? if so where did these matter come from? what is heat?("hot") where does it come from?how did energy came into being? You can't created something out of nothing, only God can do it.If you answer "no" to the 2nd question. then why nothing should bang and how nothing banged? When they solved it, I guess it's God or dusts created it. it's pure religion.Text book teaches after some dust went into the core, it starts spinning and eject everything. that should nullify all your comments. when you fall off a spinning merry-go-around you always spin the same direction of the merry-go-around. if you don't agree with this then tell me why it should bang at all.
25 comments
"when you fall off a spinning merry-go-around you always spin the same direction of the merry-go-around."
"Text book teaches after some dust went into the core, it starts spinning and eject everything"
The Pullman suggestion is funny, but I think he is talking about the formation of the solar system, and confusing it with the beginning of the universe. To fundies it must be absolutely unbelievable that the Universe could have passed more than half its lifetime before the Earth was formed... after all, are we not the purpose of everything?
As I read this, I could actually see his cerebral cortex disapper. He is also proof, as I read his comment, that you can create nothing out of something.
To be fair, he's only quoting one of Hovinds blunders, actually one of his most famous from his first taped lecture. It's funny because the passage Hovind quotes really refers to the birth of a star or somthing similar, a fact that is illustrated by the highlights Hovind has apparently made on his teleprompter.
what does dense mean? does it mean matter existed there? if so where did these matter come from? what is heat?("hot") where does it come from?how did energy came into being? You can't created something out of nothing, only God can do it.If you answer "no" to the 2nd question. then why nothing should bang and how nothing banged? When they solved it, I guess it's God or dusts created it. it's pure religion.Text book teaches after some dust went into the core, it starts spinning and eject everything. that should nullify all your comments. when you fall off a spinning merry-go-around you always spin the same direction of the merry-go-around. if you don't agree with this then tell me why it should bang at all.
You can't create something out of nothing so lets just invent a being that we will call god that can create from nothing and thereby stifle any honest intellectual inquiry.
Also, if you don't believe in god we will kill you.
then why nothing should bang and how nothing banged
Fuck all of that, what I want to know is; who banged your mom? That asshole should be made to wear a dunce hat for several years for such a half-assed attempt at procreation.
"where did these matter come from"
It's always existed but it takes amazing amounts of time to collect under gavitational pull and reactions to large mass (it is a sun and not Big Bang he's actually unknowingly hinting at, critical mass processes)
Before our universe,
The one Galactus came from.
"where did these matter come from?"
It condensed out of the energy of the big bang, E=mc^2 etc.
"how did energy came into being?"
The positive energy of matter is balanced by the negative energy of gravitation, to give a total energy of 0[*].
So not only did the universe come from nothing, it is still nothing, albeit very unevenly distributed.
[* For an explanation of this see chapter 8 of "A Brief history of Time" by Stephen Hawking.]
Uh... don't you fall off in a straight line, generally?
Yeah, you're right... to alter a velocity vector's direction or length there has to be acceleration (represented by it's normal and tangential components in certain reference frames). While you are rotating around a center (assuming you rotate at a constant angular velocity and the system is isolated) there is normal acceleration associated with a centripetal force that prevents you from leaving orbit (gravity force, string's pull, friction force on a marry-go-around or else). In such case your velocity is constant by value and varies by direction so it stays tangential to your circular trajectory. When there's no more centripetal force velocity varies no more and you leave the trajectory at a tangent and go in a straight line (since the system is considered isolated and there are no more forces to alter your velocity).
How come fundies miss this out? It's not rocket science. Such basic mechanics are even in the religious schools' textbooks, aren't they?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
