I'm 60. I've seen 5 of these floods. We get one about every 10 years or so. Nothing is new about any of this. Not the water. Not the flooding. Not the dying. Absolutely nothing. These people are a bunch of vacuous morons who are afraid of their own shadows. Too bad the Networks won't hire real men and heterosexuals anymore.
24 comments
Proof for my theory that senior's moments of absurd non-sequitur bigotry is a result of memetic perception of them forcing their way out.
"It must have been T---H---I----s bi- OBAMA'S A MUSLIM, THE GAY AGENDA, BENGAZHI!"
It happens to twenty somethings too;
"So when I get there, right, Darren's already pissed, and- INVESTIGATE 9/11, CHEM-TRAILS, IT'S ABOUT ETHICS IN GAMING JOURNALISM!"
Just as one "aw shit!" can wipe out 100 "attaboys", one Big Oil talking point is worth pallet loads of scientific proof. As for "real men and heterosexuals," they're too busy killing each other, cheering on sports teams (as if it mattered), or having sex to read the news.
"Bread and circuses."
Lets be honest, if gays brought on floods, this would have been recognized hundreds or thousands of years ago, and kingdoms/empires would be breeding their gay WMD supersoldiers to use on eachother.
"agree to my proposal or i will make 700 gays immigrate to your town"
Too bad the Networks won't hire real men and heterosexuals anymore.
What I believe he's getting at is that the media is overdoing it with the weather broadcasts these days. And so much is true. Every gust of wind is marketed as a major catastrophe, simply because weather broadcasting is a big business and normal boring weather doesn't sell expensive advertizing slots.
However, letting loose one's pet peeve and blaming that on gays isn't staying by the original argument.
Only weak, homosexual, girly men would evacuate natural disasters. Real, tough, heterosexual men stay in their homes and sit through it. Death just proves their masculinity.
If homosexuals bring floods, why don't we strategically position gays in areas around the world suffering from drought?
If homosexuals being floods, how is it the San Francisco area isn't completely under water?
I was with him up until the last sentence, then took a turn into WTF? territory. It's not the sexual orientation of the news reporters turning every minor story into the story of the year, it's that there are so damn many different news outlets that they're all competing to make any current story the most sensational.
Um, Etoculus? If you see you see every single male newscaster as gay then that doesn't mean that the networks no longer hire heterosexual men. It means that you either have a serious case of paranoia or aren't nearly as heterosexual as you want to believe you are and are on some level aware of it. Just thought you should know.
And if you see concern & sorrow for the suffering and dead as "unmaly" then you're not a man; you're a monster.
@#1809027:
If homosexuals bring floods, why don't we strategically position gays in areas around the world suffering from drought?
If homosexuals being floods, how is it the San Francisco area isn't completely under water?
The problem is that gay people only bring floods to areas where floods happen naturally. In areas where droughts happen naturally, gay people cause droughts. Obviously.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
