Noah's Ark is considered a fable by many, but then they can not explain that I have a collection of sea shell fossils collected in New Mexico 5400 feet about sea level. Nor, the ancient Hebrew inscription on a rock high on a mountain New Mexico.
54 comments
Actually we can explain the sea shell fossils you found in New Mexico. It was one time underwater, and was a shallow sea. As far as the Hebrew inscriptions in New Mexico, Tennessee, and elsewhere in North America, I've studied all those, what they call, earth mysteries, and they are interesting and entertaining, but ultimately, they're not real. And the only person that would find them of any value would be Mormons, as far as religions go. They are not really conclusive, and don't really prove anything anyway. Ultimately, your post makes no sense, and is quite incoherent. How aret those two things related? What are you trying to say or prove? What do they have to do with Noah' Ark? This makes no sense.
And the seashells had "Noah, from the Bible" written on them.
What gets me about proofs of religion is their vagueness, as most evangelicals want me to accept THEIR religion, but most proofs for theism don't prove anything about the specific political ideas that differentiate the individual ... sects or branches or whatever.
Hebrew inscriptions on a New Mexico mountain? LOL. I almost never write LOL, but that time I had to. I actually laughed.
Does it ever occur to these dimwits that some things are fraudulent?
Wait, I thought fossils were all planted anyway in an evil conspiracy to trick all god fearing people?
These people really fucking confuse me.
I'm gonna take a wild guess and sy that these 'hebrew inscriptions' if they exist are probably the work of mormons or some other early church in America. You could easily date them to show that their younger then the first colonists but it dosnt matter, these idiots would just claim the dating methods to be BS and throw this evidence out like all the rest.
jecliff, you need faith, not evidence. Get a grip boy.
No, its not that we can't explain it. Its that we say "Do your own fucking homework!"
There is a pretty good explaination for sea shell fossils in the desert - the planet is changing, and what now is a dessert area was a huge body of water. Another thing is - why are fossils allowed when you use them to proof or disproof something, but when we do it, it's all just stupid?
Pics or it didn't happen.
Also, if your source is Hovnid you are authomatically wrong, even if you are saying that the sky is blue.
@ tracer: The Flood legend is believed to come from the filling of what's now the Black Sea. Rising sea levels during the retreat of the Wisconsinan ice sheets reached what is now the Dardenelles and Bosporus, raising the below sea level lake that was there in a catastropic event. Remains of human settlements have been found offshore, showing that at least some were caught off guard. No remains of a gopher-wood boat, or cute pictures of animals being led on in pairs...
I'm stumped. I don't know how you managed to collect fossils from New Mexico 5400 feet about sea level...Frankly, I don't know how you manage to collect much of anything, having never left your parent's basement.
Noah's Ark is considered a fable by many, but then they can not explain that I have a collection of sea shell fossils collected in New Mexico 5400 feet about sea level
Well, they could if you had bothered to ask anyone of even slight education rather than so arrogantly assuming that you had the proof but no one else had the intelligence to realize it. That being said... Most, if not all of what is today the state of New Mexico sat beneath the waters of the Western Interior Seaway. Information that is available to even the lowliest prag at just the touch of a button, which you obviously know how to do since proof of you arrogance, ignorance, and abject stupidity have found their way via internet to our humble repository of quotes. So to quote a Geico caveman (Oh, the irony) "Next time do a little research."
Of course! My Computer Science instructor showed me the fossils of sponges and other sea creatures imbeded in the walls of SAIT. Obviously the main hall was standing 4,500 years ago.
Or, you know, it used to be a shallow sea and the fossils are actually millions of years old and imbeded in the sandstone. As far as the ancient Hebrew, I'm going to say it's actually either ancient aborigine, or erosion that you're reading too much into.
We actually can. Once, many years before religion, there was a sea running thru that region. The water levels drop and the plates moved to form the rockies and elevate sea shells to 5400 feet. The same happens when Indian-Australian collided with the Eurasian plate.
Yes, "they" can easily explain why the sea shell fossils were there.
Your puny mind is simply incapable of believing it.
Reminds me of "A Fish Called Wanda":
Otto: "Apes don't read philosphy."
Yes we can! Mountains grow, they start as seabed and are pushed upwards over billions of years.
The vikings sailed to America. Perhaps some ancient Hebrews sailed there too.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
