“Darwinism is not based on science!”
Okay.
Darwin is not my religion, or even a religious figure for me. Next?
“ Sheeesh. You people that believe this stuff are relentless.”
Weird how people who know the facts are steady, huh?
“Science is based on observation, and repeatable processes.”
No. The scientific method calls for repeatable observations.
A river in Wyoming has 20 million annual layers of sediment under it. If i count the layers and you do, too, we should come up with similar tallies. That’s a repeatable observation.
This does not require one person or a series of persons observe the river’s bed for 20 million years, neither the past 20 mil or another 20 mil to repeat it.
Also, I live n Massachusetts. I do not want people in any of the colleges near me forced to repeat the process of a stellar nova in order to make their study science.
“There is no physical evidence! Show me.”
Just an outright lie. And usually, the ‘show me’ demand is for evidence that evolution does not suggest. A lizard giving birth to a pig or something that the science doesn’t claim ever happened.
“It is pure foolishness (well, I have to admit, I have met a few people in my life that gave me a fleeting thought that evolution might be true)."
Oh, such an insult! You’re so CLEVER! Of course, that’s an insult, so according to 1 Corinthians, you’re going to Hell. See you there.
“You cannot observe evolution,”
Yes.
We also cannot observe that aspirin has a direct effect on lessening pain. It could just be a vast coincidence. But doctors tend to be pretty confident they can prescribe medication and get results.
Not necessary to be science, though.
“and you certainly cannot create it (therefore repeat it).”
Not an issue.
“It is the biggest hoax ever foisted on a gullible public.”
I dunno… Did the US ever invade a sovereign country because of a rumor that they had weapons of mass instruction to teach evolution with?
