A-priori conclusions, cherry picking and confirmation bias and misrepresentation are the fundamentalist's "research method". Thus that is also projected against science. Except that with science, the conclusions were not a-priori, they were derived from observation of the natural world and the best explanations for the evidence. It's not because the conclusion is derived from a modern inerrantist literalist interpretation of an ancient human tradition's literature (like the Abrahamic origin myths) that the conclusion is valid. Expert theologians also understand that these are symbolic origin myths of an ancient people, so you're on slippery ground even scripturally.
So you may claim to study all you want, as long as you are unable to post your material in peer reviewed reputable scientific journals, so that other scientists be able to replicate your experiments and achieve your conclusions, you are not doing science. As long as you work with confirmation bias and presupposed conclusions, you are not doing science. If you were doing science, you would acknowledge and deal with such human fallacies as part of the method.
A statistical glitch never suddenly discards a whole body of evidence because you must support your favorite view of the world. This is also why you discard the evaluations of such glitches by actual experts. Because you work by accumulative argument, rather than evidence and testing, your living tradition of arguments keeps growing with unquestionable claims even if they were discarded by those who know. There's even a business model behind the deception...
And because of this, some creationists beg other creationists to stop repeating some old arguments that are long understood to be false even by other creationists. But because it's religion and sectarianism, there will never be unification. Some authors attempt to reconcile them, these books can be called harmonies. It's still only the standardization of dogmatic tradition of pseudoscientific claims.
Deception goes as far as readapting the old literature of the "creation science" movement to remove direct references to God and trying to push that in schools, trying to force "Intelligent Design" creationism with the "wedge strategy", by authoritarian policy. The propaganda method is still not the scientific method, it's like Lysenkoism, populist doctrine dictation.
If you really actually look at the overwhelming evidence of evolution, it's all clearly exposed. It requires some humility and leaving arrogance behind to acknowledge it. Just like about other major discoveries that removed men from the center of the universe. Some Christians accept reality. Why can't you?