The WTC buildings did not burn to the ground; but rather, they imploded within just seconds, perfectly dropping to the ground in demolition style, which is done only with carefully placed explosives (thermite charges) inside the buildings (warning: Google is censoring this article. When I clicked on the article, it came up with an error message that read, “Page Cannot Be Displayed,” but then I waited several seconds and it finally loaded. I could be wrong, but I suspect Google (who's no doubt in bed with the CIA, NSA and Illuminati) may be doing this on purpose, betting that most people will become impatient and leave the article and move on). Keep this in mind if you see such messages while searching the internet for key articles exposing the massive CRUEL HOAX OF 9/11!!!
19 comments
The WTC buildings did not burn to the ground; but rather, they imploded within just seconds,
They burned for several hours before collapsing.
perfectly dropping to the ground in demolition style, which is done only with carefully placed explosives (thermite charges) inside the buildings
Thermite isn’t an explosive. And there was no trace of thermite (or explosives of any kind).
(warning: Google is censoring this article. When I clicked on the article, it came up with an error message that read, “Page Cannot Be Displayed,” but then I waited several seconds and it finally loaded.
That’s
a pretty ineffective censorship method.
(warning: Google is censoring this article. When I clicked on the article, it came up with an error message that read, “Page Cannot Be Displayed,” but then I waited several seconds and it finally loaded. I could be wrong, but I suspect Google (who's no doubt in bed with the CIA, NSA and Illuminati) may be doing this on purpose
Or, it could be a crappy internet connection. Why prevent someone from seeing a webpage only to allow them to see it a few seconds later?
And why censor a solitary 9/11 conspiracy page when there are thousands of others online which are easily accessible?
"did not burn to the ground"
"thermite charges"
But thermite is an incendiary.
If Google were working with the CIA/NSA, a censored page wouldn't just load if you wait a few seconds.
The only "cruel hoax" is the idiots screaming about 9/11 being an inside job.
Millions watched them fall David, we have vidios of them falling. They did not fall demolition style. Demolition style is from the bottom up. They fell from the top down as if there was a ton of extra weight on the building is could not support, like if a jet crashed into it?
If you melt or soften the supporting structure with the fire fueled by a fully loaded plane, and there are, oh, I dunno, twenty or so floors of building above that, all you need is the force of GRAVITY, David-the-dumb.
There was ZERO thermite or any explosive in those buildings, and those towers collapsed because their steel structures were weakened by the burning jet fuel and could no longer support tons and tons of building material.
In the words of the awesome dude in this video: YOUR ARGUMENT IS INVALID, DAVID J. PEDOPHILE. GET OVER IT. FIND A JOB.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzF1KySHmUA
@ creativerealms
This isn't the first time Davie has suggested that Google is out to get him. That makes me wonder why he still goes on line.
Or why he still uses Google when there are numerous other search engines available.
Sure, and thousands of WTC workers ignored a large team of workmen drilling holes in supporting columns, never mentioning the noise and dust to anyone outside the buildings. They were similarly blase' about having to step over the extensive network of cables attached to the charges.
I don't know about thermite beyond sparklers, but there would have been plenty of aluminum in the buildings from window frames, frames for suspended ceilings, furniture, etc.
I hate seeing crap like this, or "jet fuel doesn't melt steel beams". Yeah, jet fuel can't melt much as is, when it's on fire on the other hand, yeah, it does damage. Steel melts at 1525°C, and although jet fuel burns only at 825°C, it doesn't have to burn hot enough to melt to cause the buildings to collapse, since steel loses 50% of its strength at 648°C
Really Pervy Davey, A CRAPPY INTERNET CONNECTION = "THEY'RE CENSORING MEEEEEE"?
Why hasn't anyone commited him.
@Some Guy Passing Through
But what if the lies about believing the lies ARE lies? Think about that!
Whatever the hell that would even mean....I'm getting confused now....
@nazani14
I don't know about thermite beyond sparklers, but there would have been plenty of aluminum in the buildings from window frames, frames for suspended ceilings, furniture, etc.
Not to mention the airframes and skin of two jumbo jets which crashed into the buildings and burned.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.