Terrorism: is defined by the US Department of Defense as "the unlawful use of -- or threatened use of -- force or violence against individuals or property to coerce or intimidate governments or societies, often to achieve political, religious, or ideological objectives."
Sounds like atheism to me. Like when they want "God" off of everything.
I'm done with this discussion. The thread topic is repulsive and nauseating.
__________________
Politically Incorrect Hottie
33 comments
"the unlawful use of -- or threatened use of -- force or violence against individuals or property to coerce or intimidate governments or societies, often to achieve political, religious, or ideological objectives."
Sounds like US foreign policy to me...
actually it sounds exactly like...
A) All of the Whitehouse administration addresses involving iraq, iran, "terrism". Threatning horrible violence and death if people don't go to war with others that had nothing to do with the excuse that started this.
B) The "war on <drugs, crime, etc etc etc>" fallacies (you can declare war on a nation, nothing else.) Also the loss of human rights and freedoms "to protect against terrorism". Yeah, the "war on terrorism" is terrorism in its very methods.
C) "you'll go to hell", "god will hate you", "X and Y are sinful, you'll be punished eternally and so will your children and grandchildren unless they do exactly as we say"... hm... where's that from again? Oh yeah, YOU GUYS.
D) All of the above.
Not believing in santa is not terrorism. Trying to shove him down our throats, with threats of torture, death, stoning, burning and other violent acts, IS.
The responses from the people at that site are just weird. Especially post 2. Take a look. He likens atheists with al-qaida supporters. Wow.
Oh, and I like how it's the American Idol site. Isn't one of the cornerstones of Idol that the participants are bullied, yelled at and made fun of? Weird, then, how its fans can't take a gram of flak themselves.
And of course some moron decided it would be a good idea to insert the old "OMG HITLER WUZ TEH ATHEIST!!!111
"Terrorism: is defined by the US Department of Defense as "the unlawful use of -- or threatened use of -- force or violence against individuals or property to coerce or intimidate governments or societies, often to achieve political, religious, or ideological objectives."
Sounds like anti abortion doctor shooters to me - like when they want to put god in everything.
my, my.... that's a conveniently broad defintion, you've got there, DoD.
Why isn't that quote itself submitted to this page?
@CT
Sounds like US foreign policy to me...
No, the US rewrites the laws so that it's legal...
As to the fundie... Tell me, when was the last time an atheist killed someone over "In God We Trust" being on money?
So when people file suit in Supreme Court to halt public money or property being used to promote Christianity, they're actually using "force or violence against individuals or property to coerce or intimidate governments or societies, often to achieve political, religious, or ideological objectives"? Gee, maybe Ginsburg, Scalia, Thomas, etc., should be placed on the terrorist watch list.
Actually, that sounds like religious extremists.
I'd like a documented example of a group of atheists bombing a building, holding hostages, or threatening terrorism, please.
Good use of the "run away before someone refutes me" defense, though.
Please explain this woman's madness in more detail. Does she believe there are atheists somewhere, who are threatening to use violence, unless their demands to get "God" off of everything are met, or does she believe wanting "God" off of everything is violence? Inquiring minds want to know.
@sandy
A true patriot may not agree with everything the president says or does, but he prays for him like the Bible says to do.
So now the atheist is also a treasonist/traitor. Why am I not surprised....
So, the Bible says you must pray for the president.. I mean caesar? Where? And everybody who doesn't pray at all is a traitor? I guess that's what Bush senior said.
Politically incorrect, maybe, although that's not a good thing. Hottie, I sincerely doubt. What's wrong with women who define themselves by whether they're attractive to men or not?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.