MrMann #fundie

MrMann #fundie rr-bb.com

[In a thread on gays having visitation rights in hospitals, the one guy who steps slightly to the left of completely nuts gets the banhammer]

-------------------------------------------
Originally Posted by Lambeth
I am actually pretty okay with this. It's a human right to see your loved one in the hospital, not a gay right.
-------------------------------------------

Violation of multiple rules.
[04] Defend the Faith and God's infallible Word, not the ways of the world, homosexuality, liberalism, socialism,
[05] Do not promote unscriptural ideologies.
[13]No liberal left wing political agendas

143 comments

old comment by dionysus

[04] Defend the Faith and God's infallible Word, not the ways of the world, homosexuality, liberalism, socialism

S/he wasn't defending homosexuality you fuckwit, s/he was simply saying that you don't have to be a complete bigoted asshole about it.

[05] Do not promote unscriptural ideologies.

Okay, then where in scripture does it say that gays can't visit each other in a hospital? Come on now, I'm sure you have a chapter and verse. You don't? Then I guess you just violated your forum's own rule. Go ban yourself and then go fuck yourself.

[13]No liberal left wing political agendas

So no Jesus then, which again violates rule #5 above. Why do you RRtards hate Jesus so much?

old comment by Thinking Allowed.

MrMann is the same douchefag that said this earlier in the thread.

All religious hospitals will no longer take Medicare or medicaid patients.
Problem solved.

Yeah, lets see how long that hospital stays in business.

It's also interesting to note that he posts a verse that has a link to what it says in the KJV. His posts reads

"1 Cor. 6:9-10, "Or do you not know that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, shall inherit the kingdom of God."

The link that the verse goes to reads like this.

"1 Corinthians 6:910 (KJV)

9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, 10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners,"

I wonder if MrMann is breaking his own rules. Oh, I know, he's breaking that bible verse that says something about not changing the bible.

old comment by Pule Thamex

More evidence that MrMann and other RR denizens are evolving, and in some instances have already evolved, in to things not fit for this world of ours. These sad and mentally brutalized creatures are engineering it so that they can only cope in a fantasy universe complete with an imaginary overlord who tells them how to live.

They have not the wherewithal to live comfortably with humans and must exist only with demons, devils and angels, entities that live only in their own minds. They spend much of the time longing for the day when they can become ghosts, which, of course, as we all know, will be soon. Perhaps their entertainment value is their only redeeming factor.

old comment by Semi-Christian

I love the fact that a few posts later someone comes in to spread the board's position, and misquotes the bible....in comparison to the website's own linked bible.

Comment:
1 Cor. 6:9-10, "Or do you not know that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, shall inherit the kingdom of God."

Actual:
"Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, 10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. "

The passages are strangely different. "nor homosexuals" is quite literally added in for no apparent reason. Note, this is the bible that the comment LINKED TO. I mean, it was an automatic link, but it still is strange that such a difference exists. The question is whether the difference is within the bible, or within the poster's mind.

old comment by

WTF?

"As for the homosexuals, if one wants their homosexual partner to be in on health care decisions, then simple, go get power of attorney, fill out a living will, etc. This is just the homosexuals making more demands, and 0bama appeasing them."

People shouldn't have to fill out a mountain of paperwork to be able to visit a sick partner, when heterosexual couples only have to repeat a few words in front of two or three witnesses.

Also, how is it attacking the faith and God's "infallible" word to disagree about something that's not even covered in the bible? (Meaning visitation rights, not homosexuality. From what I've read, homosexuality is mentioned, just not prohibited.)

old comment by John

[04] Defend the Faith and God's infallible Word, not the ways of the world, homosexuality, liberalism, socialism, - Nothing in scripture condemns liberalism or socialism. You just twist Jesus's word to agree with your selfish "screw the poor - let 'em starve - it's their own fault" ideology.

[05] Do not promote unscriptural ideologies. - Nothing in scripture says someone shouldn't be visited in the hospital because they're gay. What part of "love your neighbor" did you miss?

Typical RR response - make up your opinions first, then cherry-pick the Bible until you find something that can be interpreted to make it sound like God agrees with you. Then sit back with your smug, hate-filled, judgmental, holier-than-thou attitude and proclaim yourself the only real Christian.

old comment by

Hey MrMann, let's see how many of your own rules you've violated:

[05] Do not promote unscriptural ideologies
[06] Do not promote false teachings

(The Rapture for those two)

[10] Treat others with dignity & respect (as you like being treated)

(This doesn't even need an explanation)

[12] Do not complain about other message boards or their members

(http://fstdt.com/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=61608)

[16] Do not promote extra-biblical scriptures. We believe the Holy Bible (39 old testament and 27 new testament books) is the only true Word of God in its entirety and fullness, perfect without error, not open to private interpretation

(See the first two)

[22] Do Not Judge In An Unrighteous Manner

(This needs no explanation)

[24] No Cultic material

(Your entire site is a cult)

old comment by Doubting Thomas

And yet, I'm sure if you asked every single member, let alone the moderators, of RR if they support the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech and freedom of religion, I'm sure they'd all say "yes."

That's why I stopped posting to RR because I got tired of having posts deleted for no reason, even though on a couple of occasions I was basically saying the same thing as regular members in the same thread. Yes, my whole purpose for being there was kind of trolling or poeing, but I hate censorship of any kind. And, according to their rules, you're not even allowed to mention that your post was deleted or censored. Nor are you allowed to question why. You're just supposed to accept it like a good little sheep.

"[05] Do not promote unscriptural ideologies."

I thought visiting the sick was scriptural? Oh yeah, Jesus said it:

Matthew 25:36 Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me.

Looks like Mr. Mann's the one violating what his own holy man said. That, and the fact there's no scriptural basis for the rapture.

old comment by

Fundie Index 124!!! I AM THE KING! YES!

I am a mod now, tis true.
So squirm at my feet, worms. My Hammer is swift and sure! Bwa Ha Ha Ha HA!

Mr Mann, I don't know if that's really you or just somebody pretending to be you, but if it is you, and you're reading this, let me ask you, is that something Jesus would say? And don't give me the "yes, because he's going to judge everyone in the end," answer. We Christians are supposed to follow the example Jesus set for us in his first coming; we're not supposed to play the role of God. While it is true that Jesus silenced those who disagreed with them, he did so with solid logic and difficult questions, not by forcibly banning them because he was so insecure in his own beliefs and couldn't think of anything to say to them.

Mr Mann, I (a Christian) would love to talk respectfully to you and to the rest of your fellow Rapture Ready members about where I think you guys have gone wrong. Unfortunately, I tried to do that, and promptly got banned. I created another account to try to reconcile my relationship with you as Jesus commands us to do in Matthew 5:21-26, and I promptly got my IP address banned. I'm sorry if I don't come across as respectful, but I hope you understand my frustration with your forum. If you guys are so afraid of dissenting viewpoints that you must ban anyone who gives one, how strong is your faith?

Mr Mann, from what I've seen of you (and this isn't meant to come off as condemning; it's just an observation), you don't seem to have the love of Christ in you. You constantly belittle others who share different viewpoints, show a distinct lack of sympathy for those people, and abuse your power. Remember Jesus' most important two commandments: "Love the Lord your God and love your neighbor as yourself" (Matthew 22:37,39). Treating people as inferiors and acting pridefully is not loving others as Jesus loved us.

Let me ask you one final question Mr Mann: How long do you think Jesus would last on your forums before he was banned?

old comment by Anon-e-moose

'Conventional people are roused to fury by departure from convention, largely because they regard such departure as a criticism of themselves.'

-Bertrand Russell

Just Google the name Kimmo Johan Alm. You'll see how Mr(Wo)Mannn equates with this equally worthless inferior subhuman waste of DNA.

But unlike Ruptured Retards' Mr(Wo)Mann and Buzzardnuts, you'd have to really go out of your way to get b& by our own admin Distind (as he had to do so with a certain Canadian fundie spam monster a while back), but otherwise he doesn't wield the banhammer the same way as those on RR do.

So at least you're free to generally say what you want here. Especially if you've been banned from RR for thinking differently to the sheeple hivemind there.

Which proves the superiority of FSTDT.

old comment by

Why do they amuse you? Here, I'll show you the comment I tried to make on your blog, and you can explain to me why it amused you:

"Jesus is not a liberal or a conservative.
Jesus is not a revolutionary.
Jesus was not concerned about how men govern themselves.
When asked a political question about paying taxes, Jesus responded, "Give to Caesar what is Caesar's. Give to God what is God's."

Great points Mr Mann! This is why it bothers me when I hear conservative Christians say that liberals are not 'true Christians.' I think these points are an excellent reminder of why you don't necessarily have to be opposed to gay marriage or take a conservative stance to be a Christian."

That wasn't word for word, but it was the general gist of the point I was trying to make. If my comment goes against God's teachings, then please explain to me how it does so that I can be better aligned with God's teachings.

old comment by Anon-e-moose

@Mr(Wo)Mannn

"I may not approve them, but they do amuse me."

Definition of Forum (emphasis added):

fo·rum (fôrm, fr-)
n. pl. fo·rums also fo·ra (fôr, fr)
1.
a. The public square or marketplace of an ancient Roman city that was the assembly place for judicial activity and public business.
b. A public meeting place for open discussion.
c. A medium for open discussion or voicing of ideas, such as a newspaper, a radio or television program, or a website.
2. A public meeting or presentation involving a discussion usually among experts and often including audience participation.

Don't see much voicing of ideas on Ruptured Retards. Certainly ideas that conflict with the status quo, or open discussion, including differing opinions.

Jesus (who voiced ideas and opinions that differed & conflicted against the norm in his time) doesn't approve of hypocrites. And it'll amuse him to see you burn in the Lake O'Fire.

Better pack your asbestos pyjamas, pal. And remember:

'Conventional people are roused to fury by departure from convention, largely because they regard such departure as a criticism of themselves.'

-Bertrand Russell

At least FSTDT's admin Distind allows those with a difference of opinion. The very fact you're allowed to post here (and extremely easily too) without being banned, and your posts deleted, proves that FSTDT is superior to Ruptured Retards.

Ergo, the superiority of Atheism (and Left-wing thinking) to right-wing Fundamentalist Christianity (with the emphasis on Mental). QED.

-EDIT-

@#1157095

"Don't go to any of MrMannn's blogs or sites. I did that once and got a nasty virus."

Now why doesn't that surprise me? But then, those like Mr(Wo)Mannn & his ilk are a virus infecting the world, with their diseased way of thinking.

old comment by Anon-e-moose

@Mr Mannn

"Heh. 190."

Indeed. The total IQ of Ruptured Retards' membership. Unless you made RR more like FSTDT, allowed anyone to post there as easily as on here, and not ban anyone who has differing religious 'beliefs' and/or lack of such, as well as opposing opinions.

Then maybe the sheeple there just might start learning something. As in thinking for themselves. Thus their IQs would go up.

So go on, Mr(Wo)Mannn. Give it a shot. Just as having a non-white, non-Repubican, non-fundie president in the White House hasn't resulted in the world coming to an end, having those who aren't fundies and aren't right-wingers in RR won't kill you.

old comment by Michael the Christian

The reason you're very likely to have the last word is because you censor anyone who tries to argue with you or makes a good point against you. This is the only place I know of that you ever come to where you don't have that power. BTW, I'm "Jacob" who keeps trying to comment on your blog (had to make up an email address so my real one doesn't get associated with your site), and the guy who keeps asking you to explain what is wrong with the following comment:

"Jesus is not a liberal or a conservative.
Jesus is not a revolutionary.
Jesus was not concerned about how men govern themselves.
When asked a political question about paying taxes, Jesus responded, 'Give to Caesar what is Caesar's. Give to God what is God's.'

Seeing as you haven't responded, looks like I have the last word so far... do you want to respond or do you want to give me the last word?

old comment by Anon-e-moose

@Mr (Wo)Mannn

"Pride is far different from stating the obvious!
205! Now bow before the Fundy King!"

The only thing you're monarch of, is Fundie Stupidity:

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FSTDT

Just about all of the tropes apply to you & everyone on RR, but particularly these titbits (emphasis added):

'Forum Full Of Crazy: Rapture Ready. It is the single most cited source of the quotes mocked on the site. The second most cited source is Youtube with 118 pages worth as of this writing. Rapture Ready? 481. And that's before you factor in the ones marked as "RR".'

'One of Rapture Ready's moderators went so far as to say that you have to be mocked on the site to get into Heaven, never mind that you usually get onto FSTDT by saying something that is hateful, racist, asinine, or generally ignorant; definitely not the type that God would want in his kingdom.'

'People from Rapture Ready are known as Ruptured Retards'

Are they things to be proud of? I don't think so. But go ahead. Keep supplying FSTDT with lulzworthy quotes. And adding to the perpetual P.R. traincrash that is right-wing Fundamentalist Christianity. With the emphasis on Mental

Along with Jim Bakker, Jimmy Swaggart, Ted Faggard, Kent Hovind, Becky Fischer, Fred Phelps (& his WBC), Rush Limburger, Sarah Failin et al, you're doing a perfectly good job of destroying yourselves.

Atheism's star is in the ascendant. Now that's something to be proud of. I'm certainly proud of being a Left-wing Atheist.

@Mr Mannn

"203! I am truly the KING!
(and I'm very likely to have the last word!)"

Want to bet on it? Unless you're prepared to answer any & all questions directed towards you here (and in other threads), and in a reasoned, logical way, then your so-called 'answers' re. your 'fundie rating' could be considered spamming, thus deserving of your being banned; don't think that's just an idle threat - it's already happened in the last 24 hours:

http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=74131&Page=7

So unless you want to become Ruptured Retards' first FSTDT 'martyr' (just as TOS(ser) has become to Love-Shite.com), just keep going with the bullshit*. Distind, please take note.

*- As your quote here proves, you're perfectly willing to dish it out on RR, but are you prepared to take it here in FSTDT? Like I say, better be prepared to start answering questions, or be proved the hypocrite you truly are, and take the consequences. You're certainly prepared to do the same on RR.

@the_ignored

"I dared him to come to our forum and debate!

In the end, he said he's open to debate, but of course, nothing."

Mr (Wo)Mann is too shit-scared of having a real debate here for two reasons:

1- He's afraid his membrane-thin 'faith' & 'political beliefs' wouldn't survive a proper, in-depth logical discussion.

2- If he has no control over the board (i.e. here, unlike on RR, he's just another commenter) and therefore the discussion, he pussies out. How will he be able to ban anyone who disagrees with his own rigid, unbending, one-dimensional, subhuman dogma?!

There's nothing stopping him from proving us wrong, after all. So go on, Mr (Wo)Mann. How about a real intellectual test of strength?

What are you afraid of?

old comment by Anon-e-moose

@Michael the Christian

Well, Mr (Wo)Mannn knows what to do then. Instead of his 'Fundie Rating' spam BS, start answering questions. It won't kill him.

Only mayhaps his 'faith' and political leanings.

What's stopping him? We welcome those quoted here (as long as they're prepared to argue the toss about their quoted BS). Right Of Reply, and all that jazz.

Unlike on Ruptured Retards. As proved by Mr (Wo)Mann's own quote here. Unless he & Buzzardnuts would like to prove me wrong, and make Ruptured Retards as easily accessible to we Atheists, Liberals, Left-wingers, non-fundie Christians, Muslims et al, Agnostics, Wiccans, Pro-Choicers, and so on.

But I suggest that from now on, nobody clicks on 'WTF?!' in this thread (or any other quote by him) in future, to deny Mr. (Wo)Mann more 'fundie' points. Or even Distind resets his 'fundie rating' in this thread to zero.

>:D

old comment by Michael the Christian

@Anon-e-moose

What's stopping him? We welcome those quoted here (as long as they're prepared to argue the toss about their quoted BS). Right Of Reply, and all that jazz.

That's exactly what I'm saying. We all know that what's stopping him is that he can't defend his views at all, but if he gets banned here, then he'll complain about how he didn't get a chance to answer our questions because he was banned, and probably try to brainwash his RRers into thinking that he was going to beat us in debate before Distind banned him. Although I'm beginning to suspect that he might just be a colossal troll, like a previous commenter in this thread suggested. If that is true, then it would probably a good thing to ban him, and it would be quite amusing to see his fundie rating be reset to zero.

MrMann #fundie rr-bb.com

143 comments

Confused?