The genius Turing, an "open" fag, was arrested and convicted because he went to the police claiming that the uneducated teenage boy labor he was sodomizing was stealing from him. It may have been the case if Turing was sodomizing a man 21 years of age, there may have been no problem.
In fact, the whole incident may have be a "lovers" spat in which the teen boy threatened and/or blackmailed Turing and Turing tried to preemptively file false charges against the teen. Once feces is involved, who knows what the truth is.
With regards to the constant claim of "chemically castrated", what is the difference between "chemically castrated" and the "treatment" that children are put on to prepare them for genital mutilation when they turn 18 years old in a sadistic "gender transformation"?
25 comments
you can try sling mud on Turing all day. even if you accidently find some facts on his private life it won't change a thing.
Turing will be remembered for his contributions for humanity while you be nobody. the least you can do is stop using any technology which developed based on his works.
With regards to the constant claim of "chemically castrated", what is the difference between "chemically castrated" and the "treatment" that children are put on to prepare them for genital mutilation when they turn 18 years old in a sadistic "gender transformation"?
In former case, you still keep your old private parts, even if they obviously don't function at full capacity, while in latter, you exchange one set of private parts with another and hope the new one will work at full capacity.
"It may have been the case if Turing was sodomizing a man 21 years of age, there may have been no problem. "
Maybe I'm missing something here but Arnold Murray was 19 at the time, an adult of consenting age. WTF difference does tacking on two years make ?
"who knows what the truth is. "
Yeah, so let's just make it up as we go along. Works for you eh ?
So, when something like theft, which happens in all kinds of intimate relationships, happens in a gay relationship, it should be ignored? Jeez, you are stupid.
Love the false dichotomy between chemical castration and gender reassignment. Complete and utter horse shit.
And finally, you do know They will still be naming streets and universities after him when you are rotting in the grave.
The "teenage boy" was also prosecuted, which indicates that he was legally adult. It was an acquaintance of Mr. Murray that was stealing from Turing, not Mr. Murray himself. There would still have been trouble, as homosexual acts were illegal, regardless of ages of the participants.
More heterosexuals than homosexuals have anal sex.
I'd say, once a homophobe gets fixated on feces, who knows what the truth is?
What is this sadistic gender transformation you're talking about and who forces this onto children? If you are talking about transgender people going through sex reassignment therapy, it's not something that is done to unsuspecting people, but a procedure that is demanded by the transgender people themselves.
Once feces is involved, who knows what the truth is.
I thought the same thing after reading this post.
Sounds like you're jealous of a gay man who changed history with his genius, while you're a nobody hiding behind the name of a comic book.
And, yes, I am a Tintin fan.
Murray, the 19-year-old (ie. not teenage boy) Turing was in a relationship with, told Turing who stole from him (hint: it was not Murray, who at the time was out to lunch with Turing).
You got almost all the facts wrong.
Once feces is involved, who knows what the truth is.
Why are homophobes always bring up shit when they think about gay sex? Is the average coprophile homophobic or something?
With regards to the constant claim of "chemically castrated", what is the difference between "chemically castrated" and the "treatment" that children are put on to prepare them for genital mutilation when they turn 18 years old in a sadistic "gender transformation"?
Chemical castration is almost always involuntary, the "treatment" to prepare for "genital mutilation" is consensual because the person being "treated" wants it. Simple as that.
@Grimsoncrow
"Isn't 'Turing test' for AI and such?"
If the Turing Test is all you know about Alan Turing, I would suggest you go learn some more about him.
@Raspberry
Because for some reason, the States have two ages of majority. 18 is when you get all the duties beaped on you, like service and voting, and then 21, when you get the fun stuff. Basically, the guy was old enough to send off to die, but not old enough to consent to a sexual relationship. Never mind that those years would be irrelevant if it was a woman...
what is the difference between "chemically castrated" and the "treatment" that children are put on to prepare them for genital mutilation when they turn 18 years old in a sadistic "gender transformation"?
One is making the mind and the hormones less compatible, the other is fixing that incompatibility.
Slandering a dead man, how noble.
Turing helped win World War 2 and is considered the father of modern computing.
what have you done, Tintin?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.