[after being questioned on the logic of a particularly violent hadith involving a pregnant woman who blasphemed and was stabbed in the stomach]
Someone, (lets say a Jew) has highjacked an aeroplane with 200 people on board (lets say there all women, and lets say their all pregnant) and it is likely that the highjacker intends to fly it into a building. Would it be logical to shoot down that plane? Or let the highjacker to what he wishes? Is there logic in killing these pregnant women?
57 comments
What? ...WHAT???!
Ok, in the unlikely event that such a ludicrous thing should occur, I would suggest you figure out the difference between there, their, and they're. You used two different ones for the same usage and they were both wrong. AND THEN you can shoot down the plane considering that they're all dead regardless and the only logical solution would be to prevent harm to those who are not already doomed.
Let's say you were facing a mugger in an alley who wanted your lunchbox full of bagels. And let's also say that a demon suddenly materialized and sat in the porch across the street, playing 'Truckin' on saxophone. A mirror on the other end of the alley, immaculately polished, reflects this scene, and since the demon wills it, he is also reflected in the mirror but the saxophone looks like the exhaust system for a late 70s Caprice. All the while, a procession of Buddhas marches in a semicircle on the east side of the alley, juggling chainsaws and spitting nickels. Suddenly, a hijacked plane carrying two unicorns and Benji the Dog, morphs into a vision of Angel Michael and swoops towards the Buddhas. The buddhas scream, and each taking a carpet knife out of their pocket, swarm towards the mirror, thinking it's the demon. And you have insurance on that mirror, but if you collect, your payments will drastically rise. Is it more logical to kill those Buddhas or to attempt to get the demon to attack the muggers?
@ Illuminatalie:
ROFLMFAO!!
You're telling me your god is so fucking pitiful that a mere insult does as much damage to him as the murder of 200 pregnant women and the entire occupancy of another, seperate building? Damn that god fellow is a whiny bitch.
Also, Jews don't fly planes into buildings. They're better pilots than that.
Of course. Because there is no difference between a delicate situation(ad absurdum, by the way), in which all possible solutions to save those women's lives have been tried, and a mere insult to your religion(and by the way, last time something like that happened, it was one of yours, not a Jew).
That's some highly improbable odds you got there. What, are they all flying to some pregnancy convention or something? And following that logic, why is the hijacker not ALSO a pregnant woman? Did they come from outside the plane (air pirates?), or did the pilot snap?
I also love how he misses the spelling for "they're" not once, but twice.
Is there anyone in or around the building? If yes, shoot the plane down while it's over safe ground. If no, let the terrorist crash it into the building. The people on the plane will die either way, so all there is left to do is minimise any other damage done.
Now that I've answered your little hypothetical scenario, please explain how the fuck it has anything to do with stabbing pregnant women in the stomach because they disrespected your little fairy story.
For starters, that makes no sense and in no way answers the question asked.
And secondly, against 200 pissed off, hormonal women, that highjacker wouldn't stand a fucking chance.
...WHUT?
What the fuck do you have against Jews?
And of course you shoot down the plane, they are dead either way, so you might as well save who you can.
And why the fuck would a plane be filled with preagnant women?
Why am I thinking this over so much? It's obvious unblind (a really stupid fucking name, I must say) didn't.
I guess if you're a religious lunatic who's convinced a single blasphemer is going the bring down the wrath of God on everyone else, and God is suspending the Fifth Commandment so you can kill her and change His mind, this makes sense.
I do believe that SOP for any hijackings in US airspace now is to shoot the fucking plane down!
Someone, (lets say a muslim) has highjacked an aeroplane with 200 people on board (lets say there all women, and lets say their all pregnant) and it is likely that the highjacker intends to fly it into a building. Would it be logical to shoot down that plane? Or let the highjacker to what he wishes? Is there logic in killing these pregnant women?
Fixed.
Ok, let's add to that and say a couple of the women aren't pregnant, they just have that guy that makes people like me mistake them for pregnant. Now those women are gonna be pretty pissed off that the hijaker and the people on the ground think they're pregnant, and they'll probably have some self-esteem issuses at this point. Now they do a kamakazee run at the terrorists and manage tobring the plane back uner control. Assuming this happens and the pilot is pregnant as well, which one would you sleep with?
Nah, I won't shoot it down. I'll fly a seperate plane, jump onto the wing of the hijacked plane, break into it and perform a shootout Time Crisis style.
In all seriousness, what the hell is Unblind smoking? Why the Jewish? What do you have against them?
If FSTDT gave awards to people that left comments I would nominate Illuminate for all of them.
In response to Unblind, I would answer each of his questions as follows:
Wibble.
ok lets say im in a mine right. and all i have is a canary, 2 onions, a fish, and 6 meatballs. should i have sex with the canary or fuck a meat ball. if i make the 2 onions fight the fish is this considered cruilty to animals. if i jump and hit my head on the mine can i eat the meatballs uncooked?
Someone, (lets say a Jew)
has highjacked an aeroplane with 200 people on board (lets say there all women, and lets say their all pregnant) and it is likely that the highjacker intends to fly it into a building.
Would it be logical to shoot down that plane? Or let the highjacker to what he wishes?
Is there logic in killing these pregnant women?
"Someone, (lets say a Jew) has highjacked an aeroplane with 200 people on board"
Care to name one example of even hardline Zionists who have , Unblind?
Thus you've demonstrated the irrelevance, nay, pointlessness of metaphorical questions in debates. Certainly ones of this nature. Is there logic in your comparison?
What colour is the sky in your dimension? This is Planet Reality calling Unblind...!
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
