Jacob Harrison #fundie

Jacob Harrison #fundie forums.fstdt.net

Since the European countries will probably go to war when the true heirs to England, Ireland, Normandy, and the Two Sicilies gain their rightful thrones, they will need to be conquered. Therefore the King of England and the Two Sicilies and, Duke of Normandy will also become Holy Roman Emperor ruling over the other European Kingdoms.

The Neo Holy Roman Empire will then go to war with Turkey and the other Arab Muslim nations in the Middle East to liberate Constantinople and the persecuted Christians and will gradually conquer the Levant and the Arabian Penninsula. It can achieve it by allying with Israel but since the Holy Land of Israel was rightful Christian Land before the Muslims conquered it, the Neo Holy Roman Empire will then conquer Israel to bring the Holy Land back into Christian hands which was the intent of the Crusaders.

13 comments

old comment by Pharaoh Bastethotep

Since the European countries will probably go to war when the true heirs to England, Ireland, Normandy, and the Two Sicilies gain their rightful thrones, they will need to be conquered. Therefore the King of England and the Two Sicilies and, Duke of Normandy will also become Holy Roman Emperor ruling over the other European Kingdoms.

The Holy Roman Empire did not work that way! First, the Princes-Elector would have to elect him German King, and then, he would also have to get the Pope to crown him Emperor.
The only thing you know about the HRE is that it has "Holy" in its name, don't you?

It can achieve it by allying with Israel but since the Holy Land of Israel was rightful Christian Land before the Muslims conquered it, the Neo Holy Roman Empire will then conquer Israel to bring the Holy Land back into Christian hands which was the intent of the Crusaders.

So the world power you wish for is a bloodthirsty empire of treacherous bastards. Why would we want to make your dreams come true again?

old comment by K'Zad Bhat

@AsimovLives

I wonder, did inanity come out right, or was that supposed to be insanity? Let's just go for in(s)anity, cover both bases.

Also, what's with people pointing out that Constantinople is now called Istanbul when that's not even nearly the problem with his misnaming? After all, he'd use the argument that the name was "changed" when Muslim invaders took it from good Christian rulers.

No, the real response is that the problem is changing the name from Byzantium to Constantinople when the Christians treacherously took over the Roman Pagans in a coup! We must rise up and take back Byzantium!

The facts are real, the rhetoric is bullshit.

old comment by AsimovLives

@ K'Zad Bhat

Actually, the city only got the name Istanbul after the secular coup that deposed the Ottoman Empire and where modern Turkey emerged after WWI. Istanbul was the colloquial name but the offical name of the city remained Constantinople throughout the days of the Ottoman Empire.

I mean inane because the post if pretty inane. Sure, it is insane too, that would go without saying.

Well, technically speaking, one could say ol' Constnatine was a bit justified in renaming Byzantium because, well, his little construction project for the new Roman Empire capital was so extensive it complete erradicated the older town that used to be there, nothing remaind of it. One thing we can't say about Constantine is that he wasn't throrough. He did for old Byzantium what he did for paganism in the empire. Sadly Julian the Apostate died too soon!

Jacob Harrison #fundie forums.fstdt.net

13 comments

Confused?