Chr1sLesl3y

@Chr1sLesl3y

Chris L Lesley #fundie #dunning-kruger

@Bastethotep #164071
You didnt know what Cope’s Law was and you are calling me ignorant, … oh-keh.
What, precisely, do you even mean by:
“Extinction is a part of life, and animals and plants disappear all the time. About 98% of all the organisms that have ever existed on our planet are now extinct.” quote from the NHM.

So you didnt know what Cope’s rule was, (formerly called Cope’s Law) the prime example is the horse evolution chart, which is completely absurd to the point that I am embarrassed for evolutionists, if they are not. You also were unaware of the 98% which evolutionists apply to the fossil record. So i have to ask:
Do any of you even study evolution? It doesnt seem like you know anything about it.
“In any case, are you aware that you are talking about a lot of material here, far more than any individual human could possibly analyse by oneself, with much of it being material that no one has come around to study yet?” cept me.
I own more fossil books than most libraries.
There are zero examples for Cope’s Rule, thats a failed evolutionist prediction, but evolutionists still try to hold back the floodgates of that 98% of the fossil record which is full of greater ancestors to every animal. (opposite of Cope’s Rule)
I am probably the biggest contributor to “Cope-shaming”, which is probably why evolutionists no longer bring it up anymore.
“Evolution is not linear or teleological.” Devolution isnt linear, it goes through a process called variation-extinction, which leads to complete extinction. There is a 4 page definition of “devolution” in the oxford English dictionary, I thought i would just answer that before you asked me what it was.
I do agree with part of what you said: “Evolution is not”
You can deny that evolutionism does not believe in an increase in body size, however, from a single celled organism to modern fauna would have done just that. (From the goo, through the zoo to you)(from fish to philosopher) (even the road to man)
hopefully you know what the “road to man” is? heh

<@KeithInc.> #164069
The flood is event based, you could hit up any ICR, AIG, or any of the huge mega Creationist orgs for that. Most of it I would just be repeating and that is not my style to follow. My area of expertise is as a designer. Creationists and evolutionists both believe in a designer, one believes in a top-down designer the other a bottom-up designer, God or a Supernature.
I am a field scientist in paleontology and paleoanthropology. My displays are in dozens of museums, a lot of Creation museums, Ripley’s, and the Spy Museum in DC. I sculpt full size whales, sharks, and do fossil molds and castings for Networks like the History and Discovery channel.
I gave you six examples already, i probably have 1500 examples of giant animals that are the same as weaker modern examples.
As far as humans are concerned you need to pick up my book: “OHIO, 88 Counties of Giants” tons of examples of humans much larger than todays people on average. 223 pages, How is that for delivering the evidence?

@Bastethotep #162374
We Creationist recognize that the fossil record is complete, we prefer it as is, raw, and nothing added. We do not mislabel 98% of the fossil record extinct as a way to explain away the fact that the fossil record does not support evolutionary predictions. We also do not invent or imagine a fossil record which you call a tree of life, which is nothing more than a religious totem of unobserved and imaginary substitutes.
We make comparisons like:

* The ancient giant Cave Lion to its modern weaker descendant. modern Lion
* The ancient Giant Naegel’s Tiger to its modern weaker descendant. modern Tiger
* The Giant ancient Panthera Augusta to its weaker descendant the modern Jaguar

* The Giant Horse (Equus Giganteus) to its modern weaker descendant. modern horse
* The Giant Cape Zebra to its modern weaker descendant. modern zebra
* The Giant Donkey (Asinus Giganteus) to its modern weaker descendant. ,Modern donkey.

Just for the record i have an example of a giant donkey jaw, and the root of a giant moose horn core.
“let alone a prehistoric giant one” excuse me (asinus giganteus) is the giant donkey, if you are 100th of the researcher i am, you will find it.
Bigger most of the time equates to better, but that is not my position. Better is a separate catagory, “better equates to higher-maturity”
There is a reason why we have various weight classes in Boxing, in the UFC, in various sports leagues like football. We are talking the rule not the exception.
Many of the world’s power lifters are 6′7″.
The better refers to maturity, Pro ballers, college, high school and little league do not mix in the animal kingdom hierachy no more than you can mix and compete them in human sports.
Better refers to the higher maturity that was achieved by all animals in the past.

Every animal today has a greater ancestor without exception, and fossil books are full of giant creatures for every weaker descendant. It is giant animals that are the 98% that is removed to maintain a support for your beliefs in Cope’s Rule, that has zero examples for.

It is quite clever to remove 98% of the evidence, to promote an anomalous belief in evolutionism. It means you can’t use the fossil record to promote evolution, without trash-canning 98% of it. A belief that forces you to remove most of the fossil record should be an awakening of common sense. Its very hard for me to put myself in an evolutionist shoes as it would require to me to accept everything by authority. Seriously, how do you apply the word “extinct” to anything? when the animal that is identical to it is in the fossil record, just larger. You believe its extinct, based solely because it doesnt support evolution. 98% of the fossil record does not support evolution.
It couldn’t be more obvious.

Horses huh? You need to look up Equus Giganteus, Equus Enormous, Equus Asinus and the Cape Zebra. I do not need the imagination of missing common ancestors like many do, their “implied evidence” I use actual fossils. All animals were bigger better faster smarter and healthier in the past … pay attention, … without exception. This is for all of you, you give me a list of 20 animals and i will show you the “Greater Ancestor” its giant from the fossil record. For all you labelers, trolls and TUMBLR rejects, put on your big boy pants and present your case without the childish name-calling. I am always available and ready to teach you true-science.

@TBTabby #118900

So this is where the uninformed hang out. Hello TBTabby, I am intrigued by your comment. So let me teach where academia failed you. Most of the fossil horses in the fossil record are in fact “giant”, meaning larger than the largest drafthorse, yes larger than Clydesdales. One of these giant species a direct ancestor to modern horses is "Equus Giganteus” the largest existing tooth comes from Texas, but there are examples from all across the United States. Equus Enormous is another, and for Zebras the Giant Cape Zebra, and Equus Asinous for Donkeys. … Done.