latest

xtremek2008 #fundie popsci.com

Then how can you prove that evolution happened? How can you prove that a big bang happened? That is faith WITHOUT evidence; at least evidence that would hold in a court of science! Now I do understand that you may have what SEEMS like evidence (such as similarity between animals), but how is that valid evidence? If you would be an automobile designer, then OBVIOUSLY your cars would be quite similar, only getting better each model! In the same way, God created creatures that have similarities! Imagine 1000 years into the future, not knowing that humans created cars, and saying that they evolved from some scrap metal! That would be a stupid assumption to make.

As to believers loving God out of requirement, that is NOT true. You obviously have NEVER loved Him at all. But I can almost guarantee that if someone rescued you from dying a certain death, you would at least FEEL GRATEFULL to the person. In the same way, we love God because He saved us from eternal damnation and separation from Him. God didn't force me to love Him....I love Him because He loved me first! I am not AFRAID or SCARED of God at all!

Xtreme Kommander

weasle886 #fundie popsci.com

all i see is a bunch of evolutionists on here whining. you know, all Darwin had a doctorate of THEOLOGY! he started as a creationist, a minister in the Catholic Church, and then decided to abandon his faith when he invented his theory. Darwin was never a scientist. And as far as I know, in all the years of science that was taught to me in high-school and college, the teachers all taught that the science could NEVER PROVE ANYTHING, REPEAT, ANYTHING!!! Look it up in your forgotten textbooks, science cannot prove anything. Just think about the whole thing about the solar system. Hundreds of years of thinking about the earth being the center of the universe was thrown out the window, yet just before, everybody in the world thought that it was fact! Lol. We're all entitled to our own view about how the world works, and we can peacefully debate it to our hearts content. But in an effort to be fair to our children, we should teach all theories in our schools, not that I personally believe in all those theories, but it should be our children's choice as to what to believe. Personally, I think we're all being a little bit childish as to our beliefs, lets all just agree to disagree.

naterz_g #fundie popsci.com

The crucial problem with evolution is that it isn't science. According to the scientific method, science is repeatable and observable. The Big Bang isn't repeatable or observeable. Evolution fits more correctly in the religion category, in that it answers the three eternal questions, "Where did we come from?, Why are we here?, and Where are we going?"

CMS_ALTAS_LHC #fundie popsci.com

Well I have never lost an argument under estimating the intelligence of an Atheist. I say now that all should test the nature of debates between Science and Religion. What fuels them is the fact that Atheists are so frustrated. While Christians, for example, are content. Atheists try to argue using science. which, in my opinion, almost obviously proves God exists.
You can pose many examples. I like to use Thermodynamics. Therein, our first law, everything moves to a state of disorder. Under this Law, our fuel, Hydrogen is abundant. The universal energy source. So if time were cyclic? We would have no Sun and we would have run out.
The red shift, Doppler effect, proves the singularity or origin, If you will. The Bible states that the stars will fall from the sky. In one of it's most confrontational verses. Which explains the reversion to this singularity. Research the literal translations of the bible from Hebrew. As John Clayton stated. The Beginning of Genesis actually reads in English, That for which there were none before created the heaved up things. Heaved... and, when written, they had no ideas about a theory as complex as the Big Bang. Not until 1934 or so. That's always a fun debate. Can of worms, anyone.

JediMindset #conspiracy popsci.com

[emphasis added]

yes our great fore fathers(the annuaki) manipulated there own cells to prevent aging and dna decay. that are immortal and a 100 years for us is like second for them. they programed thier own bodies to "evolve" to prevent death. they can die but not so easily. i heard of a group of annuaki that decided to engineer there bodies to be "cyborgs" when they die that automatically upload there minds into another body. there skin is made of Super strong material that makes kevler look like tissue paper. i hope one day to mate with one. during mating, instead of conception, dna is made stronger and improved.

TheRedFox #fundie popsci.com

This is to the people who say viruses evolved yes they did, but notice it is evolved with a SMALL e which evolution of this form occurs all around us. Everything around us adjust to its surroundings, its all in the DNA. Using the virus example if it is in a colder area the next generation will be born with cold resistance if there environment heats up then the next generation will be heat resistants. The evolution you are referring to is Evolution which is the theory that all these small changes could ad up into a perminite change in the species. This we have never seen before ever. So as of yet NOTHING HAS EVOLVED but Everything has evolved.

AdamEvenson #conspiracy popsci.com

If I had a matter that none but the recipient may see, the last thing I would use is email or the computer at all. I have known this since I began going on line in early 1996. This is because I knew the government in 1996 as no normal citizen can possibly imagine. Once one hits that "send" button, it is literally impossible to know that the message is secure from prying eyes. For that matter, I would not even write the message on ANY computer and then erase it, because of the possibility/probability that the government has the ability to see every keystroke whether I send or delete without sending or even going on line. I would assume that the government has conceived a way to snoop inside every computer in the world, no matter what. If one has a secret that could compromise one's existence by being known to the government, the best security measure is keep it to oneself and not tell another soul. If any vibration of one's concept leaves one's own skull, one may as well know that the government could very well know about it the moment it separates from one's own neural system. Indeed, even one's secret thoughts may not be secure from prying government eyes. This is reality talking.