The crucial problem with evolution is that it isn't science. According to the scientific method, science is repeatable and observable. The Big Bang isn't repeatable or observeable. Evolution fits more correctly in the religion category, in that it answers the three eternal questions, "Where did we come from?, Why are we here?, and Where are we going?"
35 comments
"Evolution fits more correctly in the religion category, in that it answers the three eternal questions, "Where did we come from?, Why are we here?, and Where are we going?"
No, evolution has nothing to do with any of that.
Actually, evolution is a scientific theory. Biology, which uses the theory of evolution, is a science.
The Big Bang is a scientific theory. Physics, which uses it, is a science.
Clear?
Big Bang: NOT EVOLUTION!!1!
And your definition of "religious questions" make it so that explaining where you headed for vacation is a religion.
Where did we come from?
Why are we here?
Where are we going?
So, really, only one question got answered.
Finding new fossils is repeatable. Then there's fruit fly speciation experiments, Miller-Urey, epidemiology, computer simulations validating the basic model, etc.
Evolution fits more correctly in the religion category, in that it answers the three eternal questions, "Where did we come from?, Why are we here?, and Where are we going?"
Wrong. Evolution doesn't purport to answer even one of those questions. Evolution provides answers for this question: "By what process did Humanity rise to become Homo Sapiens Sapiens ?
What the fuck does the question, "Why are we here?", in any way shape or form have to do with evolution???? That is a religious or philosophical question that has absolutely NOTHING to do with science, and is NEVER asked or answered by evolution!!!!
"observeable(sic)"
Dumbfuck can't even spell observable.
See Penzias & Wilson's Nobel in Physics, imbecile.
And evolution has been observed repeatedly.
Hope for a nice fatal MRSA infection, jackass.
Where did we come from is abiogenesis, as in life...
Big bang =/= evolution
Also, evolution is observable, that's why most of it is fact.
"Where did we come from?, Why are we here?, and Where are we going?"
... and why do we spend so much time wearing digital watches?
then again, creation isn't repeatable or observable, but you never hear us whine about that now do you?
evidence this game is about. (I know, evolution is repeatable and constantly happening)
your hypocrisy...
Repeatable: Joe and Moe can both look at the same rock sample, can both run the appropriate tests, and can both come up with the same answer for the age of the sample. Joe and Moe can both look at the same fossils and see the relationships between ancient and modern species. AND Joe and Moe are allowed to disagree with each other concerning those fossils, but each of them will be required to provide evidence for his conclusions.
Now we have a hundred thousand scientists who have looked at the fossils and come to the same conclusions. Isn't that repeatable enough for you? Any number can play; you are allowed to disagree, but unless you have evidence, it isn't science.
No, I said EVIDENCE, not arguments. Now here is the hard part, so listen closely: if by some means you could prove evolution is incorrect, it would still do nothing to prove your god hypothesis. If you want to prove god, you will need (** all together now **) EVIDENCE!
“The crucial problem with evolution is that it isn't science.”
“According to the scientific method, science is repeatable and observable.”
"The Big Bang isn't repeatable or observeable.”
“Evolution fits more correctly in the religion category, in that it answers the three eternal questions, "Where did we come from?, Why are we here?, and Where are we going?"
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
