www.amazon.de

CAM #fundie amazon.com

This man here, read his book, research who he is if you need to totally disagrees with your assertion. The Testimony of the Evangelists: The Gospels Examined by the Rules of Evidence A Harvard grad. a major law school named after him... You cannot put your eternal soul in jeopardy by weakly pushing off the evidence. Eternity is a duration of time which ceases. And you will sit there having lied to yourself and help damn others souls you are wrongly affecting. Think about this Rachel. Wake up and strength the things that remain. You have people in your life that you are responsible for under God to try and lead them to Him instead of what you are now doing.

Robert B. Winn #fundie amazon.com

Atheists worship nature. Everything they call science today is worship of nature. We could discuss relativity and the Galilean transformation equations if you want to. Atheists worship a false miracle called the length contraction

Tim S #fundie amazon.com

Not at all, but you miss the point. Something exists as soon as it can be conceived. If something does not exist, we would be unable to describe it. Therefore, atheist on this forum have asserted that God exists as an idea, but he has nothing to do with the universe, it's creations which includes man. That we are manifest from evolution. Is that right? Or do you want to add to this?

The Southerner #racist amazon.com

"rather it is his failure to acquire the realization that there is only one human race on this planet and that it originates from Africa"

Then your points regarding diversity and nativity are non-arguments and baseless. If there is only one human race then particularities, that is, what we call "culture" or "race", are illusory and constitute an impingement on the one human race since the particularities only serve as divisions.

Yet, arguing for the "human race" is still racism precisely because it argues for one race over all others, "others" being the fact that different races, segments and sub-segments of those races have existed for centuries.

Now, the 'Humanism' you seem to argue for isn't exactly based on a Humanistic conception of humanity, in any philosophical or even anthropological sense. Instead, its extremer because it adheres purely to biologism since you claim that Africa is the one origin of this race, race being defined by biology. You are thus exposed to be, not only a "racist", but a biological one. This trick permits you to implicitly state that, though we are all biologically one race, all others are derivations of the Africa genome, and this permits you to imply that all differences amongst the race, however illusory, are nonetheless dependent on Africa because Africa is now the origin of the race's biology and thus atop the hierarchy that has been casually imposed.

In summa, your final statement that, "As such, all people are validated from their respective cultures", is absolutely nonsensical because by this point in your tirade you have committed three fatal contradictions. These occured, of course, because your rant is exactly what it occuses others of being and has absolutely no intellectual strength whatsoever, and thus no credibility, unless you consider brutishness credible. Yet, that is supposedly what you are opposing, right? Or do you simply oppose the existence of whites? Unconsciously, the latter is certainly the truth.

Debbie Dish #racist amazon.com

Take, for example, his writings on white hypocrites when it comes to racial integration. He writes, "But the most transparent hypocrisy [on the part of white liberals] pertains to racial integration and diversity, which white liberals claim are vitally important and sources of great national strength, but from which they assiduously shield and disengage themselves and their families. Indeed, on no other issue are fecklessness and dishonesty more evident than the myth of integration. *All* white liberals claim to believe in it, and *all* white liberals fail to practice it."

In other words, white liberal hypocrites say one thing and do another when it comes to racial realities, such as where to buy a home and where to send their children to school. Borzellieri points out that not one prominent white liberal has ever bought a home in a black neighborhood, despite their assurances that such a move would be a "strength." A strength for thee, but not for me, I guess.

goblueresurrection #fundie amazon.com


The first one is all that's necessary to show atheism fails - empirical adequacy.

Its demonstrable by using IF , THEN statements.

IF atheism is true , THEN the universe is either eternal, or "nature" caused it to begin or it leaped into existence out of nothing uncaused.

Ok - let see if there is any evidence to support any of those scenarios:
1. the universe is external: False

A portion of the the evidence:

"Philosophically, the notion of a beginning of the present order of Nature is repugnant to me ... I should like to find a genuine loophole."
Arthur Eddington
"The End of the World: From the Standpoint of Mathematical Physics"
Nature, vol. 127 (1931) p. 450

-Arthur Eddington - "The beginning seems to present insuperable difficulties unless we agree to look on it as frankly supernatural."

-Stephen Hawking: "In real time.....the universe had a beginning."

-Steven Hawking: "It has been interesting to watch the change in the climate of opinion on singularities. When I was a graduate student, almost no one took singularities seriously. Now, as a result of the singularity theorems, nearly everyone believes that the universe began with a singularity. In the meantime, however, I have changed my mind: I still believe that the universe had a beginning, but that it was not a singularity."
Text of `Origin of the Universe' by S.W. Hawking
(Copyright 1988 Stephen W. Hawking. All rights reserved.)

-Dr Guillermo Gonzales: "Like Einstein, most astronomers of the early twentieth century, including the young Hubble, believed in a static and eternal universe. Even after Einstein conceded his error in the late 1920s, many scientists would not accept the implications of an expanding universe-namely, that it can into existence sometime in the finite past."
The Privileged Planet, Gonzales & Richards.

"The picture today is more complete and much richer. The cosmos began 13.7 billion years ago with the big bang." " In our journey back to the beginning of creation, cosmologists first travel through the well-established history of the universe back to the first microsecond; then to within 10-34 second of the beginning, ..."
Scientific American, Sep 2009

-Dr. Robert Jastrow-who until his recent death was the director of the Mount Wilson observatory once led by Edwin Hubble: "Now we see how the astronomical evidence leads to a biblical view of the origin of the world. The details differ, but the essential elements in the astronomical and biblical accounts of Genesis are the same: the chain of events leading to man commenced suddenly and sharply at a definite moment in time, in a flash of light and energy."

-Dr. Robert Jastrow- "Astronomers now find they have painted themselves into a corner because they have proven, by their own methods, that the world began abruptly in an act of creation to which you can trace the seeds of every star, every planet, every living thing in this cosmos and on the earth. And they have found that all this happened as a product of forces they cannot hope to discover. . . . That there are what I or anyone would call supernatural forces at work is now, I think, a scientifically proven fact."

- Einstein tried to avoid such a beginning by creating and holding onto his cosmological "fudge factor" in his equations until 1931, when Hubble's astronomical observations caused him to grudgingly accept "the necessity for a beginning."
A. Vibert Douglas
"Forty Minutes With Einstein"
Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada
Vol. 50 (1956), p. 100

"Many once believed that the universe had no beginning or end and was truly infinite. Through the inception of the Big Bang theory, however, no longer could the universe be considered infinite. The universe was forced to take on the properties of a finite phenomenon, possessing a history and a beginning." Chris
LaRocco and Blair Rothstein, University of Michigan http://www.umich.edu/~gs265/bigbang.htm

The present location and velocities of galaxies are a result of a primordial blast known as the BIG BANG. It marked: THE BEGINNING OF THE UNIVERSE! THE BEGINNING OF TIME!" Terry Herter, Cornell University http://web.archive.org/web/200607182...o101/lec29.htm

"That radiation is residual heat from the Big Bang, the event that sparked the beginning of the universe some 13 billion years ago." Craig Hogan, University of Washington http://www.washington.edu/newsroom/n.../k032102a.html

Ok - so an eternal universe is ruled out via evidence - that leaves atheism:
1. nature causing the universe to begin
2. an uncaused universe

Lets examine the remainin 2 options for atheism:
1. "nature did it" - what natural forces cause time, space and matter to leap into existence from nothing? There are none - so this option fails.

The last: an uncaused universe.
Preposterous scientifically and logically as this violates the Law of Causality.

So this leaves us a universe that began due to a cause;
1. The universe CANNOT be eternal or static because:

1. The First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics: this says that matter cannot be created or destroyed, it just changes form. The universe contains a FINITE about of energy/matter. The universe still contains usable energy so therefore, the universe cannot be eternal because all the usable energy would have been used up by now.
2. The Cosmic Background Radiation: A static and eternal universe would not have the afterglow of its beginning.
3. Universal Expansion: The universe is still expanding. If the universe was static and eternal it would not be expanding. If it were eternal all the matter in the universe would be an infinite distance apart. Expansion requires a single point of origin in order to have a place to expand from.
4. The Cosmic Rebound Theory is false: Charles Bennet of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center;" The universe will expand forever. It will not turn back on itself and collapse in a great crunch." There is not enough matter in the universe to collapse it back again, therefore the universe had a beginning.
5. This assumes no energy would be lost in each successive crunch/bang.
6. There is no evidence for a Big Bang, Bang, Bang, Bang.
7. The Kalam Cosmological Argument:
a. An infinite number of days has no end.
b. But today is the end of history(history being a collection of all days)
c. Therefore there were not an infinite number of days before today.
d. Another way of saying this is one cannot add anything to infinity. But tomorrow we will add another day, so the number of days must be finite. Thus a finite number of days has a beginning.
Therefore I conclude that the universe had a beginning. An infinite anything within the material universe is theoretically possible, but not actually possible.
8. The Law of Causality: the universe is one big effect, an effect has to have a cause. This is the foundation of all science. If you reject this then you reject science itself and we cannot go any further.

The universe is finite, therefore it had a beginning. Relativity demands a beginning to space-time-matter and has been mathematically verified to 5 decimal places and confirmed by the above empirical evidence (which Relativity predicted such as expansion as well as others, such as parallax (which Relativity predicted also).

CAM #fundie amazon.com

One God manifested in 3 persons or beings if you prefer. Father, Son & Holy Spirit. Example. H2O - water, vapor ice - All 3 the same element. Different manifestations. If the most basic element can be 3 how much more the Triune God?

Rover #fundie amazon.com

It's true there are no proofs outside of Math and logic, but the things I argue are based upon logic. And anyone who wants to debate the existence of God must first accept for the sake of argument that God could exist. It's a logical foul to pretend to join such a debate and then automatically claim victory because one cannot prove what is accepted for the sake of argument. The debate itself is logical reasoning over hypotheticals. So, one can prove that certain things are logically true about those hypotheticals without proving them to be absolutely true.

Also, it's illogical to assert that a Supreme Being couldn't possibly be loving and Omnipotent, without simultaneously accepting the hypothetical existence of said God. That's a tautology that goes something like this: 'Something is false because it cannot be true.'

Rover #fundie amazon.com

The natural universe appeared from nothing.

Since the universe is all that naturally exists (matter, energy, forces, space and time) whatever the first case was must have been super-natural.

Since the universe hasn't always existed, the first cause couldnt have been in operation eternally but was the chosen action of a free agent.

Since the universe is massively large and full of unimaginable energy, the first cause must have been unimaginably powerful.

Since the universe is finely-tuned to support matter, energy, life, etc, the first cause must have been immensely intelligent.

Since the first cause created time, the first cause must itself exist in an eternal state.

So, the first cause (or Creator) of the universe was a super-natural, personal, Omnipotent, Omniscient and eternal Being. That's God.

Robynn #fundie amazon.com

I know a man who proudly practices witchcraft. I have known him since he was boy. He was diagnosed with bi-polar when he was just a young teen. I see a spirit that looks like a gargoyle super-impose itself on him minutes before he flips out. When he would flip out as a boy he would become overcome with a murdurous rage. He physically broke things and seriously hurt the other smaller children that he could lay his hands on. I know he tried to drown his younger cousin, i had to wrestle his cousin away from him. When the gargoyl spirit passed off of him his memory of the incident was completely different from the events. It appeared that he was lying because his memory did not match what every eye witness witnessed. As he grew up he literally has no memory of most of his childhood and zero memory of any of those murderous events because he isn't in his right mind when that spirit comes over him. The gargoyl spirit is in control.

Robynn #fundie amazon.com

What you are denying 'Ware no kuni' is the existence of the spirit realm. I am Christian, I know first hand that it is real. Both Good and Evil. I have seen evil spirits. I have cast a ghost out of a home, and I have seen healing miracles, I have also received healing miracles. I even watched a short man grow 5-6 inches before my eyes. He didn't move a muscle to straighten himself out or to stand taller. It certainly was not in hismindset that it was possible that he would be able to grow taller. If you speak to a practicing witch they will tell you first hand that the spiritual realm is real and that they manipulate it all the time. This Ideomotor theory was popular when I was a little girl. My father at first allowed this game in our house because he had been told that was all it was too. And for us younger kids that is all that it was. We pushed the pointer around to the yes and no portion we didn't know how to spell. But my older sister, who may have been 12-13 at the time, the pointer moved as she moved her fingers OFF the pointer. And to this day 50 years later she still talks about it. It creeped her and her girlfriend out and that experience is probably why my father removed that game from our house and forbid us to ever play it again at anyone's house.

Robynn #fundie amazon.com

Dowsing, pendulum, and even muscle testing for disease and allergens are all three using the same 'spirit' paranormal forces. Just because someone came up with the theory of ideomotor effect and proved their theory with tests designed to prove their theory, that dousing or that Ouija Board boards are not paranormal activity-- but idiomotor effect the theory does not really test what is truly happening or not happening at the time of the test in the spirit realm. It is a faulty test. It is certainly not the last word on the subject. If you have never experienced paranormal activity, or if you do not believe it is possible then it is going to take a lot to open your eyes. If a spirit is not wanting to show off to the tester, then the spirit may not perform to prove a test. The spirit may not want the publicity it may in fact want to bring about loss of respect fir the dowser. I have personally seen a pendulum in action and the most bizarre account I have is that of a sterling necklace with a light weight sterling cross sliding freely on the chain.. (Imagine a clock face, where are the numbers placed on the face of it?) When the necklace was held out-- dangling from the forefinger-- the cross, due to gravity, naturally hung down to 6pm (on the imaginary clock face) because of gravity the cross might jiggle and move a bit due to slight arm movements but it would still be hanging at 6pm. That is the only option in our natural world. But when something in the spiritual realm invisibly interacts with our world all kinds of strange things can happen at the whim of the spirit entity and that is something that the tests proving ideomotor can not disprove or prove because the test is not designed to test whimsical movements of a spirit entity. Back to the necklace, several questions were asked of the pendulum. It gave many answers both yes and no. always giving answers. Then while the person stumbled over their words to ask the 15th question, the pendulum lifted up just as if a person picked it up in anticipation of giving the final answer and rested mid air at 6:40.Until the question was finished. 6:40 IS IMPOSSIBLE in the natural realm. It was as if an unseeen (spirit) hand was waiting holding the pendulum. Ideomotor couldn't explain that away or what happened next. It was as if there were two entities both fighting to take control of the cross. It was back and forth between 6:49 and 5:10 as the spirits fought over which one of them would be allowed to answer. So the truth is that YOU can choose to ignore the paranormal but the REAL scientific evidence you are staking your claim on is indeed B-O-L-O-G-N-A.

Peter Overton #fundie amazon.com

[ Commenting on the book review of Why Evolution Is True, which he has never read. ]

Hey all you primed up brain washed lemmings! It is time to wake up and see what's really going on here! This is not conspiracy theories this is reality and you are being lied to. You are not some unique young mind that has matured into a beautiful scientific flower.
You are lied to, you have not had some incredible revelation through being told this, this is not the epitome of humanity.
Everything you think you know to be true is wht they want you tot think true.
You have been backed up into a corner you know nothing about and has some sweet scales pulled over your eyes.

It is time to decode your coded mind and beat out what has been beaten into you.

Evolution is a lie...

NOW WATCH and set yourself free.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1ufK04tjOI&list=UUGd-zCzZssSVAqKibVeDPdA

Angel #fundie amazon.com

"And actually there are four forces. Gravitational, the strong nuclear force, the week nuclear force and electromagnetism. These forces account for everything seem in the universe. The rest is make-believe."

***Angel says: No argument on the physical forces, but you have not equated the force of the Godhead, using Einsteinian theory, E = mc^2. Below is my theory.

The Trinity
(Three separate or interchangeable entities under one Godhead)

where E = Energy (God the Father)
m = mass (Jesus Christ, the Son)
c = speed of light (Holy Spirit, the Mother)

and with movement E = mc^2 + K

K = Jesus Christ (the resurrected, Holy Ghost)

Therefore, the Godhead or Trinity, in actuality is a Tetragrammaton.

YHWH or Tetragrammaton

Y = Yahweh (God the Father)
H = Yahoshua -Jesus Christ (Son)
W = Holy Spirit (the Mother
H = Jesus Christ (Holy Ghost).

YAH (Yahweh) = YAH (Yahoshua)

Therefore, as Jesus of the New Testament, fulfilled the Old Testament, He aslo fulfilled the Tetragrammaton. :)

Angel #fundie amazon.com

Dr Joseph Parker says:
"I'm afraid that is unscientific gibberish. But I do appreciate the attempt."

***Angel says: Thanks, but the attempt was for your enlightenment.

In actuality, it is perfect science. Further, this fact is clearly outlined in the first few chapters of Genesis.

It was (God the Father, force #1) and the (Holy Spirit, the Mother and light, force #2) that lit the world prior to the creation of the sun.

Genesis 1:1 God (the Father) created heaven and earth - Force #1
Genesis 1:2 And the Spirit of God..." Holy Spirit, the mother and light. Force #2

Genesis 1:3 God said, Let there be light and there was light.

Genesis 1:26 Let US make man in OUR image.

The image of God is the Godhead or family unit. :)

And it was the Holy Spirit, the mother who stated, "This is my beloved son, in whom I am well pleased" when Jesus was baptised by John the Baptist at the Jordan River. The dove was representative of the feminine aspect of God...the Holy Spirit or Ruach HaKodesh.

Now you're well informed on the relationship between science and creation. :)

T. Lau #racist amazon.com

(NOTE: This guy is reacting to a (not exactly flattering) Birth of a Nation review)

As to the Black question, I will allow blacks and early european explorers to address the issue:
Youtube:
"Shocking Africa ++18"
[2:24-18:00 -- depicts black Africans in their native habitat as the early european explorers found them]

Slavery was rampant among African blacks themselves BEFORE the europeans ever arrived on the continent. It is unfortunate that europeans had the indecency to take advantage of the African situation, although the slave trade was also disproportionately Jewish .
["The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews"]

Then there's rap, hip-hop, pop -- which generally depicts sex, drinking, drugs, (hard) partying, and all manner of vulgar discrepancies, whether unabashed or subliminal.
__________

As to your comment on "white supremacy", what white supremacy?

What? When? Where?

In the white countries themselves where the population is disproportionately white? What's wrong with white running their own government in a white country? (Just like asian countries are run asian officials! I sure as hell don't want blacks running my beloved homeland of Hong Kong!)

The KKK were vilgilantes in costumes to hide their identities. Nothing more. Nothing less. There's no need to distort who they were or what they did.

I am certain an asian version of the KKK would rise up in Hong Kong should a minority group such as blacks were to subvert the majority population of asians in politics.

To be fair, the British did treat many minorities in Asia unfairly, and usually that was because the British empire (and other Western countries) were/are controlled or manipulated in small but significant part by one entity, one religious tribe....Banned history books and the Bible confirm this.

Think for yourself, people!

P.S. Take a walk down Harlem, New York -- or Jamaica or Haiti (once a beautiful european colony), those are the conditions of the black communities today...

Let's say the black race IS EQUAL to the white or asian race, wouldn't it then make sense that black countries in general would not require the help of Western countries (white countries)? (ie. job opportunities.)

I am not talking about only Africa, I am talking about black countries in the Americas as well.

Why do blacks need to emigrate? (On a side note, I do not agree with the mass emigration of asians into white countries. Still, one can see that asian countries are much less degenerate and unruly when compared to black countries.)

Unfortunately, the good blacks in intermingling in white communities are only part of the very small minority of smart intelligent blacks in a vast pool of backwards and child-like dark-skinned fools. (I don't mean that as an offense. No, I mean this factually. Based on my own personal observations, that of others and blacks themselves.)

The black mentality is:

"If you're a black and smart and intelligent and clever and learned, you are NOT black. Therefore, you get the boot out of our community, See yah!"

_____

Therefore, Birth of a Nation is very true (all the while frightening) in its message. Separation of the races is necessary to maintain peace and harmony.

Janine #fundie amazon.com

Although a bit out of date by now (It was written in the 80s), Michaelsen's Like Lambs To The Slaughter provides signposts for occult influences on children that every parent should be aware of. Contrary to some of the other reviews on this page, what Michaelsen points out is both true and alarming. One may call it paranoid to consider cartoons such as the Smurfs occultic in content, but when the Smurfs feature Gargamel standing in the middle of a pentagram calling down a curse in the name of Beelzebub-- others would call it discerning. If you can get this book, get it. Though out of date, it will be helpful to you as you raise your children. I hope Michaelsen updates her work soon.

"Madam" #fundie amazon.com

(A defense to a fellow Fundie "Frans" in an Amazaon review section of Drunk With Blood: God's killings in the Bible)

Actually, God didn't say that Adam would burn in hell for disobeying. He said he would eventually die from disobedience, and that is exactly what happened. God WARNED Him in order to spare humanity any suffering via their disobedience. Disobeying God is in essence, not following the owner's instruction manual, and making too many really big mistakes, resulting in the destruction of the thing in question (the creation, and people). By Adam's sin under the influence of an evil lying spirit, we all have been horribly impacted, ever since. Everything slid to hell, so to speak. Humankind continued to degenerate and the products were extreme evils of perversion and random violence, of every description. Life upon planet Earth had become nothing but a huge lot of criminality and suffering, for those subject to the evil beings. They had all but a very few, become totally tainted with the dna of fallen angel demons apparently, and the violence was intolerable. Just as today, there are torturers and criminals, serial killers, rapists, dna tampering, etc--- probably worse back in the day of destruction. Think about it, EVERYONE WAS DOING IT. THOSE perpetrators were the kind God had to wipe out, for instance, with Noah's flood.
And I don't think God actually gave humans free will. Where that came from, I'm not sure- but i could not find it in the Bible. He created us for Him, we are to do specific purposes of His. We're His creations to properly represent and move as His image. We're kinda like, God's little animated,living, feeling, miraculously made me-dolls. In the beginning, things were perfect- He provided everything for humans and life was beyond sweet. Like the rest of the Universe, things had to be in perfect harmony and synchronicity, etc- but disobedience ruined it. Things got way off kilter. Because God's enemy came and decided to screw it all up for us, to mess it up and get us to hate God. And it looks like you too, drank the koolaid.
Well, our Maker sent His Son to us to save us from the big wreckage the Enemy had created. God is the author of Love and all that is Good. He made this universe to work perfectly, and so if we are going to continue to mess it up and NEVER align with the rest of the universe within His perfect will, what is He to do? One badly corrupted person's malfunction can throw off the whole creation. This universe is perfectly timed to within one millionth of a second! Humans cannot be allowed to throw it off by their chaotic disobedience! ( Obedience to the REAL Creator Spirit is the most beautiful and good feeling thing.) but WHAT IF IT'S MILLIONS OF PEOPLE ALL OUT OF ORDER AND NOT CO-OPERATING with God's perfect Spirit, EVER?
Think what total destruction of the planet and universe that could cause if not put to a stop. Unfortunately, that means stopping them (i.e., death) for those nasty worthless slimes who are part of the super problem. He won't allow that. WHY SHOULD HE? The nasty business that has happened on Earth will be confined to Earth, it will not be allowed to ruin the entire universe. (the whole earth, and the universe, and all that is in them, all affect each other)!
But God is saving and redeeming every soul He can, which is the ones that accept His redemption from this disastrous disobedience problem, so that we can straighten up and go on in eternity in a paradise perfect existence in total Love. In perfect harmony and unity with the workings of the perfect Universe. PARADISE. But of course, AFTER getting rid of the evil factors which destroy all that is good. God does not destroy good , but God destroys that which is evil, so that the evil cannot destroy the good. TELL ME, WHEN YOU CLEAN YOUR HOUSE, IF IT'S A MESS, DON'T YOU ALSO THROW OUT THE GARBAGE? IF YOU NOTICE AN INFESTATION OF COCKROACHES, DON'T YOU EXTERMINATE THEM?

***Tip: don't be a cockroach to God. ***

This life is but a tiny blip on the timeline of eternity. Choose life eternal in paradise of love. Realize that it is all much bigger than your human mind.

dutchlionfrans "Frans" #fundie amazon.com

(A review to the book Drunk With Blood: God's killings in the Bible)

You judge from your limited observation. God's killings are actually acts of grace. If He had not killed all living creatures except Noah, the earth would have been hell, because of the hybrid- people - half fallen angel- half human being that satan had poluted and filled the earth with. KILLING THEM saved God's plan and the uncontaminated human race by one man: Noah. For only Noah was perfect in his generations - UNCONTAMINATED BY SATAN'S SEED!

And as Jesus foretold that the last days were going to be as the days of Noah - meaning: the human race would again be polluted - they are experimenting now with animal DNA in human bodies etc.

God had a choice: Either destroy the whole earth and everone, because satan had corrupted all living matter, including Noah and the animals God led to the Ark. Simply to start all over. He had done that once already: Because the earth was not made void when God created the heaven and the earth. NO IT BECAME VOID, when satan and 1/3 of the angels who followed the archangel Lucifer in his rebellion battled God's angels. The creation account from Genesis 1: 2c is actually a SECOND CREATION!

God - in His incredible grace did not want to kill the only perfect seed left (Gen. 6:9) - so He spared the earth and a sample of all animals for the sake of one man!

THIS IS GRACE! But you look at all the hybrid humans God killed. This killing does not make God cruel at all. But rather the very opposite of a cruel genocidal murdered. The bad guy was satan who contaminated all human seed.

The reason for satan doing this was the curse over him, the prophecy God had given Eve after sinning: "And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel." (Genesis 3:15)

Satan figured that the only way he could prevent this - his total destruction and defeat - from ever coming true was to prevent the developping of that seed! This is what he did by contaminated the human seed with his seed. God could never fulfill His plan of salvation, which this verse speaks of and is God's promise right after the all of men. That seed God promised in Genesis 3:15 is Jesus Christ, the only begotten Son of God!

So, you see God's grace in the absolute necessaity of killing all flesh with the exception of Noah!

As for the other killings by God, similar explanations can be given. God kills to redeem! God ALWAYS LOOKS AT THE BIGGER PICTURE, THE GREATER PURPOSE.

Satan murders out of hatred, as we were created in the image of God. Satan hates God and therefore satan hates us. He knows God loves us, so that murdering people is the way to hurt God.

I stand in awe of God, when I consider this! His infinite wisdom!

Knowing this, I consider all these accusations of people of God for His killings such folly. They have no idea. But they have such a big mouth...these created beings against their Maker!

In addition: God's grace is also visible in the fact that sin resulted in death! Sin brought death into the earth!

Death is an act of grace by God for if God had allowed men to live for ever, this earth would have been hell! It would have meant sin would have been perpetual.

Thank God all men die since sin came into the world by Adam and Eve.

God's plan from the beginning was to create men to be with Him for ever! But since men chose to disobey Him, and sin - go their own way, do their own thing - God had to make the penalty of sin: DEATH! For He can not allow sin to exist for ever!

This proves God's unlimited wisdom, and also His LOVE!

In the end death will be thrown into the Lake that Burns with Fire and Brimstone! (Rev. 21:8)

On top of this: He provided the sacrifice in His very own only begotten Son of God to die for us, paying the penalty for our sin, so by His resurrection from the dead, He overcame death and opened the way for us to be reconciled with God, to be forgiven and to be free from the penalty of sin, the second death (Rev. 21:8) and live with Him for ever, as He had intended from the beginning! All we have to do now I call upon Him, repent of our sins, our unbelief, our rejection of Him, our going our own way, and ask His forgiveness and that He makes us His child, lets us be born -again, and destroys the plan of satan with our lives and releases His plan for our lives, and teaches us to walk with Him, commune with Him - for He is not dead, but He is alive and wants to have fellowship with us. For ever! John 1:12,13; John 3. John 14:6. Acts 2:38; Acts 4:12. 2 Corinthians 5: 17; Galations 6:15; etc.

MJO #fundie amazon.com

I also found the location of Socrates' plagiarism from the New Testament:

1 Corinthians 1:25 "For God's foolishness is wiser than human wisdom, and God's weakness is stronger than human strength."

Jamie James #fundie amazon.com

Imagine a poultry farm owner replaces chicken with horses. Scientists excavating the site some time later find the chicken fossils older than horse fossils. Assuming that this is the only place where the fossils were found, the Evolutionists will conclude that horses evolved from chicken because that is the only possibility.

Let us look at a practical scenario: There isn't a convincing hypothesis, let alone evidence to support the claim that those primitive fishes, defied its animal instinct and left its safe home, water, and crawled into a hostile place, land. Evolutionists, ignoring the contradictions and lack of evidences, argue that animals evolved from fishes just because animal fossils appear later in time than fish fossils in the fossil record.

It is perplexing that some of the finest brains in human history spend their entire life trying to prove a theory which borders with non-sense. Isn't it makes more sense that there is a d(D)esign for every system?

Sword7 #fundie amazon.com

I recongized that I had similar experiences like Johanna Michaelsen since I was a small kid that fell into my involvement of occult when I practiced witchcraft. I experienced frequently visions, dreams, and hallunications. How greatly wrong I am! I finally accepted Lord Jesus as Lord and Savior and renounced my involvement of occult. I prayfully am looking a way to end the pyschic powers with Lord's guidance.
In 1997, When I ordered and read this book, the demons manifested and oppressed me! It lasted two seasons until I confessed every sins from birth to present in Jesus' name. Yes, that is so real. Be careful when read this book.
I strongly recommend this book as excellent education tools to everyone who was involved with occult and want to repent toward Lord Jesus Christ. Also, I strongly recommend that Dr. Rebecca Brown's books ("He Came To Set The Captives Free", "Prepare For War", "Becoming A Vessel of Honor", and "Unbroken Curses") for everyone

Karen C #racist amazon.com

It just boggles my mind to think that intelligent but misguided people can proffess so much concern about the endangerment of eagles in America, apes in Africa and tigers in India but seem totally blinded to the fact that one of the major races of mankind is now on the brink of extinction. Most Whites who speak out and as a result are called "racist" do not hate people of other races, they simply wish to be allowed to continue into the future as a distinct racial group. What in Heaven's name is wrong with grandparents wanting to have grandchildren who resemble them?

luv great kids books #fundie amazon.com

(A fundie reviews a documentary about flowers on Amazon.)

Wow! I'm only a few minutes into the film and I had to stop and give it a review! I am suprised no one has reviewed in the one star area the ridiculous evolutionary propaganda in this film. Not to mention the incongruity of calling mating in insects "love". (Isn't reproduction just a force pushing along the evolutionary process?)
Is it really possible that some plant, somewhere, a few million years ago randomly sprouted a flower (smart little plant!) and it was such a good idea that flowers started making it harder to get to their own pollen by lengthening their tubes to make the process of pollination even more efficient? And plants even gained enough smarts to seduce bees into a waxy tunnel of their flower, drop them into a sickening sticky substance, supply only a single escape route where the bee struggles as the pollen is deposited on their backs, grips the bee until the pollen glue has dried and then allows it to fly off and go deposit the pollen in another orchid. Why didn't those smart little bees say, "No way! I'll go find an easier way to get my orchid cologne! Or I'll find some lady bee that loves me for who I am and not what I smell like!"
Can it be possible that the ideas in this film are presented as fact? Can it be possible that the highly specialized process of pollination and codependence of the animals that live off the products of the flower was a random accident that developed over millions of years and made the world what it is today? Just look at the complex beauty, intricacies, functions, and dependencies of life. And the silly flower in this film thinks it developed these complexities all on its own. Prideful plant! Foolish flower!
Turn off the commentary and enjoy the beauty and wonder of God's creation!

Richard D. Fuerle #racist amazon.com

The importance of this book is that it explains that racism is rational. That is, by favoring people of one's own race, a person is increasing his fitness. This means that the anti-racists are trying to convince people to lower their fitness and eventually go extinct. In evolutionary terms, racism is adaptive and anti-racism is maladaptive. A further implication is that racists are in harmony with man's nature (indeed, the nature of all living things - to pass on the unique forms of one's genes), and that anti-racists, who go ballistic at any tinge of racism, are psychologically pathological.

Bruce Eldine Morton #conspiracy amazon.com

(Description of Bruce Eldine Morton's book "Two Human Species Exist: Their Hybrids Are Dylsexics, Homosexuals, Pedophiles, and Schizophrenics")

Two human species have long existed,unrecognized in front of our very eyes. They are Homo sapiens patripolaris and Homo sapiens matripolaris. Their reproductive differences remain unnoticed. Yet, because they are two different species, when they cross-breed, their hybrid offspring are cross-wired to produce Dyslexics, Homosexuals, Pedophiles, and Schizophrenics. This book contains published questionnaires that enable you to find your hemisity, your familial polarity, learn to which species you belong, and what type of "normal" or hybrid you are. Unrecognized, life-affecting differences in courtship and child rearing exist between the two species. This is the topic of Familial Polarity whose ancient existence and influence upon history you can confirm for yourself. Ignorance of familial polarity is a major source of multiple levels of global conflict.

JustThinkAboutIt #fundie amazon.com

This is simple. To believe in evolution without any supernatural power involved you have to believe in everything coming from nothing. And after you have been able to answer that first question which is impossible as EVERYTHING that is actually OBSERVED in this world is made from something. Then you have to ask after life came from nothingness from the matter that came from nothing how it survived a huge explosion making the universe. Not to mention that then randomly 80% or more of the world suddenly has an urge to believe in something they cant see or contact with (according to you that its not there). There should be no urge for that. There should be no wright and wrong. There should be no punishment. There should be no laws. There should be no fear of anything.

A Customer #racist amazon.com

I started out wanting to know what could possess and entire race of people to participate in the most atrocious (sp) crime against humanity -- the four hundred year african slave trade--- I found the answer in "Yurugu". As it turns out, it makes perfect sense how europeans could participate in the slave trade for that many years without "batting an eye". It's in their blood, it's in their hearts, it's in their minds; it's in their souls (even though they think "souls" don't exist). "Yurugu" for me has confirmed many of the discomforts I have experienced as a person of African descent in dealing with europeans. The part of the book that I thought was signficant is where Dr. Ani describes and discusses the "bi-polar" affects of european culture and thought. European's inability to view the whole and their interconnectedness with the whole of humanity and their spiritually accounts for the chaos we are experiencing in these times. She confirms for many of us what we have known for years. This work is very powerful! A must read for every African of the diaspora!

J.C. Davidson #racist amazon.com

(Trifecta!)

The comment left by Old Anthropologist is a good reflection of academia today.Academia as well as the media is controlled by a particular race of people that is bent on the dis-empowerment,displacement and destruction of the White race,particularly the White male.One of the primary tools for this strategy is using Africans to lower the standards,dilute the gene pool and displace White workers.As race chaos increases,Old Anthropologists race has risen to positions of power throughout the United States and turned the country into a slave plantation and police state for Whites while having made it a play ground and welfare state for non-Whites at the expense of Whites.This tribe of Old Anthropologists was run out of over 100 European countries because of their behaviors and flooded into America,but not before they killed 60 million White Christian Russians during the Bolshevik Revolution.Once in America they immediately went for the jugular of their host country and have been purveyors of porn,gambling,syndicalism,usury,perversion of law and academia and truth,drugs and once in government have made America a warmonger nation.While White Americans were dying in unnecessary wars,Old Anthropologists race began taking over whole swaths of industry and today they own banking,Hollywood,TV,the music industry and so many other.This is why Industry has been moved overseas and the people who print our money got a 23 trillion dollar bail-out,forever chaining America to a debt owed to robber European privately owned cartel bankers known in America as The Federal Reserve System.Hopefully your White child is not being tutored into self hatred and disregard for his or her White heritage by this genetic "serpent".

Richard D. Fuerle #racist amazon.com

Hi, R.D. Fuerle here. I am not going to reply to all the criticisms of my book, some of which are for assertions I don't think I made, but I just wanted to clarify a few points. In Chapter 23, I try to make the case that man evolved from a Eurasian ape, not an African ape. The only connection between the human lineage and Africans is that very early Eurasian man migrated into Africa and interbreed with an African ape, producing hybrids. Subsequent migrations by more evolved Eurasians into Africa and interbreeding with the hybrids there brought more Eurasian alleles in to Africa. Several times I say that man never left Africa except as slaves.
As to sibling incest, I am not advocating it and find it repulsive, but the scientific case for it being genetically harmful in the absence of deleterious recessive alleles (DRAs) is weak or non-existent. The only reason this comes up is that those who advocate race mixing argue that it is genetically beneficial since it is far away from inbreeding, which they believe is inherently harmful.
By the way, I know there are errors in the book and I appreciate those who have brought them to my attention. I have corrected the ones I am aware of in the free internet version and will try to publish a corrected hard copy in a few years. RDF

john thames "scholar1" #conspiracy amazon.com

[Review of Red Republicans and Lincoln's Marxists: Marxism in the Civil War by Walter Kennedy and Al Benson]

This by no means comprehensive survey of forgotten influences demonstrates that Communism came to America from the Jewish inspired revolutions of 1848 by way of the Republican Party. The revolutions of 1848 were heavily Jewish inspired in all countries. In France, Adolf Crimeux and Michael Godschau, the finance minister, were the leaders. In Bohemia, Rabbi Hirsch and the father of Louis Brandeis were the promoters. In Austria, Joseph Goldmark and Adolf Fischof led the revolution. Louis Kossuth's Hungarian revolution was top heavy with Jews demanding emancipation. On and on it went.

These German and principally Jewish Marxists fled to America where they became the founders and leaders of the Republican Party in 1855. The Jacobi brothers from Germany founded the first American Communist Party in New York about this time. August Biondi, a Hungarian-Jewish refugee, became the chief aide to general John C. Fremont in California.Carl Schurz, a refugee from the German 1848 revolution, became Republican Senator from Missouri. Many Civil War generals for the Union were 1848 refugees. The general Blinker, whose name became synonymous with pillaging, is one example. Anyone who reads this excellent volume will discover many further illustrations of Jewish Marxism fleeing 1848 Europe and becoming devoted servants of the American republic. Not an insubstantial number became American diplomats serving as envoys to such places as Japan. It almost inclines one to think that a certain international influence was at work.

At any rate, get the book and read it. It may not sell you the thesis of the Protocols of Zion but it will get you thinking.

Scott #fundie amazon.com

Dear Atheists: How do atoms obtain their fuel?

All atoms throughout the universe require power to maintain their action and motion and to maintain their consistency. This power is specific, regulated, and precisely measured. If everything in the universe came into existence by itself from nothing, then, according to humanist thinking, it only makes sense that all of this power continues to come from nothing...I don't think so.

Anything that exists requires some sort of power source to fuel its locomotion and existence. I've yet to see anything that doesn't get it's power from something else so it only makes sense that the incalculable power of the universe has to be provided by something or someone else. I think the notion that the massive power of the universe is somehow upheld by nothing requires an inordinate amount of blind faith. There is an old saying in Colossians 1:17 that says, "And he is before all things, and by him all things consist".

Joe G #racist amazon.com

[In response to a review of 'The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements' titled 'For fans of David Irving and David Duke']

Thanks for the typical Jew review. The author says things Jews don't like, so he's labeled a White Supremicist Anti Semite Hater Neo Nazi Who Wants to Kill Six Million Jews. I've noticed Jews have no problem slandering anyone or any group that dares cross them. It doesn't matter that this book is factual, it makes Jews look bad. Now that people are finding out the Holocaust Story is a bunch of BS, Jews are having a harder time intimidating people who reveal unflattering facts about them with the Anti Semite label. Here's a very Anti Semitic but factual website Jews don't like, "Holocaust Denial Videos".

Joseff Amador #fundie amazon.com

It is clear that God hated Esau. Paul uses this example to say that Esau was a vessel of wrath prepared for destruction. Salvation and damnation are both things that exist to glorify God. You must embrace the God of the Bible, not the God of comfortable emotions. (that's an idol) Don't view God with sticky, romantic sentimentality, or view him with our fallen emotions.

We must think rightly about God, and to do that we must believe what the Bible says about him, even if sometimes it's a bitter pill to swallow. How comfortable we are about God's attributes and actions does not determine whether or not something is true. The Bible does, regardless how we feel about it. This is why Paul tells us to renew our mind, and conform it to the word of God, rather than vice versa.

Finally, a poster above is correct. You cannot separate the sin from the sinner. It is impossible for God to love the sinner but hate the sin. Sin is not an external thing that only exists on the surface level of who is a sinner is, but it penetrates to the core and defines who the sinner is. God does not throw sin into hell, he throws sinners into hell. God does not view sin as a desperate thing from the sinner (unless that person is saved, of course).

Jonathan Edwards is 100% correct. In hell, God will abhor you. The Bible tells us that God Himself describes his wrath being poured out by saying he will crush you under his feet until your blood splatters and stains all of His clothes. (Isa 63:3) If you cannot worship this God, then you are not worshiping the One True God, the God of the bible, but an idol. A god of your own making, a god in your own image.

Don't throw away God's holiness, righteouss, and wrath and justice against sin for the sake of His love. You must embrace and accept both attributes, or else you have a half-god, a false god.

Anne Young #fundie amazon.com

I don't think that Atheist's say things that are stupid, but I would question the use of the Breath that God breathed into them as, well, not exactly brilliant. I promise that I am not hating on anyone, you were made beautifully and I'm not allowed to judge and I don't even want to, but can I ask a simple question? Have you ever been overwhelmed with Love? If you have, then hasn't God, who is love, overwhelmed you? If you Love anyone...you God them. Love is God, and you are worthy of Love and I know, that you love someone with all your heart. Help the people that you have been helping and be honest like you have been and the difference that you make in the world will be...beautiful. If you love...

Peter Overton #fundie amazon.com

The fact you read so many books written by clever means you have to be right! I have spoken to many people about this who are far greater in aptitude than you are! Bacteria and disease are not Evolution. They are symbiotic and need us to survive that is not what you think. Disease is mutated cells!Mutated cells is not what we are.

Evolution is new information, adaptation not.

You have prived nothing, you have presented some weak arguments that suggest we came from a hairy creature.

That is right suggestion, suggestion is strong like the ancient astronaut theory.

Right so you know my life poorly formed or you assume? Assume I guess that seems to be what your good at. Go talk to your husband about E=mc2 and al that boring crap. I will enjoy life while I have it. I go on correct information.

Angel #fundie amazon.com

***Angel says: Those equations are for a particle at rest E = mc2

Yet, moving particles or all things that move have kinetic energy.

K = 1/2 mv² (K = kinetic energy, v = velocity m = mass).

KE= mc2 - m0c2

With that in mind for a moving particle or object, Einstein's formula becomes:

E = mc^2 + K

Further, Einstein did not believe in a personal God. Had he realized Jesus, the personal God, was in fact the savior and the Holy Spirit was the source of light in the creation, Einstein would have made the connection that the sacred name of YHWH, the Tetragrammaton was fulfilled by Jesus as well.

E = mc^2 + K

E = Energy (God) the Father
m =mass (Jesus Christ) the Son
c = speed of light (Holy Spirit) the Mother
K = Kinetic Energy (Holy Ghost) the resurrected Christ

Fullfilling the sacred name YHWH or Tetragrammaton

Y = God the Father
H = Jesus the Son
W = Holy Spirit the Mother
H = Holy Ghost, the resurrected Jesus

Perhaps this is why Einstein was unable to make the connection to the Tetragrammaton.

As well, the speed of light squared may in fact be the speed of the light that is referred to as "The Holy Spirit," who lit the world during the creation, prior to the formation of the sun.

The Holy Spirit may, in fact, be the speed of light squared.

Angel #fundie amazon.com

I've altered my view.

When you visit the beach for the purpose tanning in the sun, you allow the sun's rays to beam down on the front of your body, and before you burn too much, you turn 180 degrees and the process is repeated on the back of your body.

With that 2-step process in mind, the blood images on the shroud were deposited with radiation hitting the shroud during the resurrection process and that was responsible for the transfer of the blood image onto the cloth.

Jesus' body was emitting light during the resurrection. After the frontal image was produced by His blood, He turned once and the dorsal image was produced, in the same manner. Blood appeared on both sides of the cloth on the outermost fibrils, but did not seep through the entire cloth.

Or Jesus was using the light from the sun, as a source of radiant energy.

I find it would be difficult for, as an example, the sun's radiant light to hit both the front and back of the body of Jesus simultaneously, but Dr. Piczek stated His body was the source of emitted energy, and I, as well thought of this process initially (emission of light, not levitation).

Yet, since the stone was rolled away from the tomb and the soldiers who were on guard were basically unconscious, my feeling is Jesus harnessed the light of the sun to initiate the resurrection process.

Therefore, I propose a two-step reaction involving a levitation. If Jesus is able to levitate, as Dr. Piczek has proposed, He is able to turn once, as well.

The front of His body is subjected to a beam of light from the sun and the frontal image is transferred onto the shroud cloth.

At that point, Jesus turns once, slowly, and the back of his body is submitted to the beam of sunlight and the dorsal image appears on the back of the shroud cloth.

In this manner Jesus is controlling how much energy in the form of photons, as example, is hitting His body.

So, it would be equivalent to your turning over from front to back when you're in the process of receiving a sunburn in the tanning process. You alone control how much light your body is receiving.

In this manner, only the uppermost fibrils on both the back and front of the cloth would be colored with His blood.

And voilà, we have the image on the shroud. Yeah!

This would be what you would call magic, Rachel.

Angel #fundie amazon.com

[Can't you see how convoluted this explanation is? You're beginning with your conclusion and working backwards, which is the method used by a believer and not a scientist.]

I am stating my conclusion to you, and working backwards. When I thought of this process, I worked forward in a step-wise manner.

All pieces of the puzzle must be carefully examined if you are initially given a completed puzzle.

As an example, Einstein may have been working on Energy and he may have calculated the product of mc^2 first.

Knowing the product and knowing the weight of the matter he was working with, Einstein may have calculated backwards to find "what value" times that amount of matter would give him that amount of Energy.

Therefore, working backwards, Einstein may have played around with the equation until he found speed of light squared was the missing link.

Or Einstein may have known the speed of light, but that value did not work in his equation. Einstein, therefore, may have doubled the speed of light and that didn't work either, and as a result of a few failures, he may have ultimately squared the speed of light. Once Einstein squared the speed of light that solved his problem. Einstein easily could have worked backwards.

Having the value for the speed of light squared, Einstein then would have been able to show E = mc^2.

Yet, Einstein may have found his formula by working either forward or backward.

Peter Overton #fundie amazon.com

essentially tho you are saying we once a different species yes? You may have as much discussion as yuou wish. In the end there is no transition of one species to another.

There is one experiemt to prove evolution.

A peice of bateria has to be monitor for a few millenia. That little it has to change into a new vessel. If this can not be done then evolution can not be proved.
Adaptation is not evolution and adds no credit to the theory.

I have a good book I want you to read please.

It is here on Amazong called "Evolution is stupid"
please read this. You have to forget all your intelligence, humble yourself, then read this book and re-evaluate. There is nothing to understand with evolution, the facts that back it yes need understanding but these do not credit evolution.

I understand evolution very well! I have heard all the arguments and t all makes brilliant sense! My conclusion! Not possible, defies natural laws.

Angel #fundie amazon.com

Brian, you state you are comfortable stating "I don't know," and you really don't concerning the Almighty, yet if you do not believe in God, and that's your call, you lack peripheral vision, as well as logic.

You are probably unaware through a lack of observation that certain flowering plants bloom at certain times to feed the various animals. Some flower for the bird's consumption, some for the rabbit, some for the chipmunk and some for the squirrels. Man did not create this natural phenomenon...or have you noticed?

Peter Overton #fundie amazon.com

[The reviewer gives the book Why Evolution Is True one star]

I am reading through reviews on this and it seems much like many of the reviewers have been washed by the theory of evolution; Just like creationists get washed by religion. I have been thinking about evolution and how insulting and stupid it sounds. I was just talking to a man who told me we are related to a Salamander and a Titaalik. We are ancestor to a common Ape with Apes. Many of these analogies are made. The Evolutionists believe all this is fact and reality. They are so incredibly blinded by this idea written with in fossils. Common sense and reasoning has been completely abandoned. I am astounded by these Scientists. If you sit back and just look at what they say, trying to proof this Evolution exists; it is completely senseless. It resembles smart babble. It is mind numbing. It defies our intelligence. It eradicates ones ability to think for them self. It is so dumb buying this book would waste my money. I could buy and eat an egg, I think I will do that yes....

[...]

I have not read this book. I have watched the man do an interview on why Evolution is true. So I have seen him in the flesh. I saw his body language and his persona. He came across as hollow and snide. I had no choice I had to give a star. [Emphasis added]
I have not dismissed the author I have dismissed the concept of Evolution. It is unfortunate the Author has touched on that subject.

Brad Watson #fundie amazon.com

[There is simply too much from this post to quote all of it. Please see the full thing.]

The anti-GOD antichrists atheists on this forum are probably too blind to 'acts of GOD' to recognize GOD's intervention with me - His Christ - yesterday. Therefore, I ask for volunteers for a sci-religious experiment to prove GOD/nature and I - their Christ - can produce a natural disaster for your neighborhood. Are there any?

Brad Watson, Miami #fundie amazon.com

There are countless examples from history of proof that there is a GOD. I'll briefly give just one...

The War of 1812 continued into 1814. In August of that year, the British sailed up the Chesapeake and marched on Washington, DC. They met very little resistance as they entered the US Capitol. On August 24, the then unopposed British set fire to several Federal buildings including the White House! The next day, while the fires still raged, suddenly a hurricane passed over the Capitol and some claim to have even seen a tornado come down Pennsylvania Avenue towards the British! Not only was the White House fire and others put out by this great storm, the incredibly strong winds reportedly tossed British cannons into the air killing some soldiers and wounding others! When the storm was over, the British regulars and officers were so spooked by what had just happened, that they retreated - unopposed - to their ships and sailed off. (Google it.)

The path to hell is on my bookshelf

Rather interesting read too

Etienne, William Bobbitt & brandon delozier #fundie amazon.com

Etienne: Yes if witty words were responsible for creating an objective universe then Hitchens would be god. But witty words and subtle phraseology is simply a mechanism satan uses to deceive the unscientific [evolutionists], irrational and gullible amongst us. Or should I rather say the God haters around us who would rather live for self than God, those who would rather choose sin than to surrender!
Hitchens, Hawking, Dawkins and the other 150 reviewers understands nothing about the nature of philosophy or reality. And how can this Christian make such a bold or objectively true statement? Because the atheist has no final authority in the universe concerning all matters of faith and practice, He can only borrow presuppositions from the Christian worldview to make his own irrational and satanic worldview seem more plausible. Thus every atheist is a thief as well.
Has any atheist refuted Dr Craigs moral argument for the existence of God. Dr William Lane Craig makes a spectacle out of atheism and atheists. Every atheist is also deep down inside a believer in God; he merely suppresses that objective fact in unrighteousness as God states in His Word, the King James Bible.
Presently every atheist is portable only because he can use the legs God gave him, he can only reason because God has given him a mind to reason with, but things will drastically change in the next life! There, in absolute blackness, he will be stationary, suffering the wrath of God for all of eternity. What a deal. And who said atheism doesn't have something positive to offer its religious followers!

William: Good luck when you stand before the God our father!
Your non belief however nicely spoken is wrong, wasted education. I believe you have already had your time before our God. I am sorry for those who do not believe !

brandon: Go to church. God is watching you. Buying this book is a direct path to Hell. Don't waste your time or money. Test the scientific evidence, pray to God and you will be saved.

Doctor Michael J Olivieri #fundie amazon.com

MaryAnn H. says:
Yes, there is a woman (unless she has already died) waiting in a hospital to die with her unborn, badly malformed fetus who can not have a legal abortion. The doctors all concur that the fetus can not survive but they are prohibited from aborting it to save her life. So all these fine religious folks will stand around proclaiming "god's will" and watch her die.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
They said the same thing about Helen Keller who has enriched the lives of so many--ever hear of her? Nah. You probably emigrated from Nazi Europe & thought she was euthenasized. Also, that lady can take a short ambulance ride to another meat market where they'll make dog food out of the baby.

goblue #fundie amazon.com

Please present the evidence that inorganic molecules chemically evolved into DNA - oh and include evidence of where the information within DNA came from and what journal article you have that demonstrates evidentially how "nature" does the selection and sequencing entropy word to get from base pairs to DNA with the information intact.

Amar #fundie amazon.com

Precisely. Every one of our quotodian existence comes with its angst. Any belief or disbelief should address the ways and means of doing that. Theism, however flawed, does it. Atheism is a big ZERO in this.

Gaylen #fundie amazon.com

Intelligent design isn't a Science.

Oh really. So it is not important to find out what spirits are? It is not important to understand what life really is? It is not important to find out who created DNA? Things that can't be explained should not be researched?

Anthony L. #fundie amazon.com

Everyone is NOT an atheist. There is only one, true God. All others are fake, delusions. Not believing in something that does not exist is not atheism.

I am the LORD your God, and I only shalt thou serve.

Next page