racist

[Part 3]

Gruesome cruelty

Another aspect of African behavior that liberals do their best to ignore but that nevertheless requires an explanation is gratuitous cruelty. A reviewer of Driving South, a 1993 book by David Robbins, writes:

“A Cape social worker sees elements that revel in violence It’s like a cult which has embraced a lot of people who otherwise appear normal. At the slightest provocation their blood-lust is aroused. And then they want to see death, and they jeer and mock at the suffering involved, especially the suffering of a slow and agonizing death.” (Citizen [Johannesburg], July 12, 1993, p.6.)

There is something so unspeakably vile about this, something so beyond depravity, that the human brain recoils. This is not merely the absence of human empathy, but the positive enjoyment of human suffering, all the more so when it is “slow and agonizing.” Can you imagine jeering at and mocking someone in such horrible agony?

During the apartheid era, black activists used to kill traitors and enemies by “necklacing” them. An old tire was put around the victim’s neck, filled with gasoline, andbut it is best to let an eye-witness describe what happened next:

“The petrol-filled tyre is jammed on your shoulders and a lighter is placed within reach . Your fingers are broken, needles are pushed up your nose and you are tortured until you put the lighter to the petrol yourself.” (Citizen; “SA’s New Nazis,” August 10, 1993, p.18.)

The author of an article in the Chicago Tribune, describing the equally gruesome way the Hutu killed Tutsi in the Burundi massacres, marveled at “the ecstasy of killing, the lust for blood; this is the most horrible thought. It’s beyond my reach.” (“Hutu Killers Danced In Blood Of Victims, Videotapes Show,” Chicago Tribune, September 14, 1995, p.8.) The lack of any moral sense is further evidenced by their having videotaped their crimes, “apparently want[ing] to record [them] for posterity.” Unlike war criminals, who hid their deeds, these people apparently took pride in their work.

In 1993, Amy Biehl, a 26-year-old American on a Fulbright scholarship, was living in South Africa, where she spent most of her time in black townships helping blacks. One day when she was driving three African friends home, young blacks stopped the car, dragged her out, and killed her because she was white. A retired senior South African judge, Rex van Schalkwyk, in his 1998 book One Miracle is Not Enough, quotes from a newspaper report on the trial of her killers: “Supporters of the three men accused of murdering [her] burst out laughing in the public gallery of the Supreme Court today when a witness told how the battered woman groaned in pain.” This behavior, Van Schalkwyk wrote, “is impossible to explain in terms accessible to rational minds.” (pp. 188-89.)

These incidents and the responses they evoke“the human brain recoils,” “beyond my reach,” “impossible to explain to rational minds” represent a pattern of behavior and thinking that cannot be wished away, and offer additional support for my claim that Africans are deficient in moral consciousness.

I have long suspected that the idea of rape is not the same in Africa as elsewhere, and now I find confirmation of this in Newsweek:

“According to a three-year study [in Johannesburg] more than half of the young people interviewed both male and female believe that forcing sex with someone you know does not constitute sexual violence [T]he casual manner in which South African teens discuss coercive relationships and unprotected sex is staggering.” (Tom Masland, “Breaking The Silence,” Newsweek, July 9, 2000.)

Clearly, many blacks do not think rape is anything to be ashamed of.

The Newsweek author is puzzled by widespread behavior that is known to lead to AIDS, asking “Why has the safe-sex effort failed so abjectly?” Well, aside from their profoundly different attitudes towards sex and violence and their heightened libido, a major factor could be their diminished concept of time and reduced ability to think ahead.

Nevertheless, I was still surprised by what I found in the Zulu dictionary. The main entry for rape reads: “1. Act hurriedly; 2. Be greedy. 3. Rob, plunder, take [possessions] by force.” While these entries may be related to our concept of rape, there is one small problem: there is no reference to sexual intercourse! In a male-dominated culture, where saying “no” is often not an option (as confirmed by the study just mentioned), “taking sex by force” is not really part of the African mental calculus. Rape clearly has a moral dimension, but perhaps not to Africans. To the extent they do not consider coerced sex to be wrong, then, by our conception, they cannot consider it rape because rape is wrong. If such behavior isn’t wrong it isn’t rape.

An article about gang rape in the left-wing British paper, the Guardian, confirms this when it quotes a young black woman: “The thing is, they [black men] don’t see it as rape, as us being forced. They just see it as pleasure for them.” (Rose George, “They Don’t See it as Rape. They Just See it as Pleasure for Them,” June 5, 2004.) A similar attitude seems to be shared among some American blacks who casually refer to gang rape as “running a train.” (Nathan McCall, Makes Me Wanna Holler, Vintage Books, 1995.)

If the African understanding of rape is far afield, so may be their idea of romance or love. I recently watched a South African television program about having sex for money. Of the several women in the audience who spoke up, not a single one questioned the morality of this behavior. Indeed, one plaintively asked, “Why else would I have sex with a man?”

From the casual way in which Africans throw around the word “love,” I suspect their understanding of it is, at best, childish. I suspect the notion is alien to Africans, and I would be surprised if things are very different among American blacks. Africans hear whites speak of “love” and try to give it a meaning from within their own conceptual repertoire. The result is a child’s conception of this deepest of human emotions, probably similar to their misunderstanding of the nature of a promise.

I recently located a document that was dictated to me by a young African woman in June 1993. She called it her “story,” and the final paragraph is a poignant illustration of what to Europeans would seem to be a limited understanding of love:

“On my way from school, I met a boy. And he proposed me. His name was Mokone. He tell me that he love me. And then I tell him I will give him his answer next week. At night I was crazy about him. I was always thinking about him.”

Moral blindness

Whenever I taught ethics I used the example of Alfred Dreyfus, a Jewish officer in the French Army who was convicted of treason in 1894 even though the authorities knew he was innocent. Admitting their mistake, it was said, would have a disastrous effect on military morale and would cause great social unrest. I would in turn argue that certain things are intrinsically wrong and not just because of their consequences. Even if the results of freeing Dreyfus would be much worse than keeping him in prison, he must be freed, because it is unjust to keep an innocent man in prison.

To my amazement, an entire class in Kenya said without hesitation that he should not be freed. Call me dense if you want, but it was 20 years before the full significance of this began to dawn on me.

Africans, I believe, may generally lack the concepts of subjunctivity and counterfactuality. Subjunctivity is conveyed in such statements as, “What would you have done if I hadn’t showed up?” This is contrary to fact because I did show up, and it is now impossible for me not to have shown up. We are asking someone to imagine what he would have done if something that didn’t happen (and now couldn’t happen) had happened. This requires self-consciousness, and I have already described blacks’ possible deficiency in this respect. It is obvious that animals, for example, cannot think counterfactually, because of their complete lack of self-awareness.

When someone I know tried to persuade his African workers to contribute to a health insurance policy, they asked “What’s it for?” “Well, if you have an accident, it would pay for the hospital.” Their response was immediate: “But boss, we didn’t have an accident!” “Yes, but what if you did?” Reply? “We didn’t have an accident!” End of story.

Interestingly, blacks do plan for funerals, for although an accident is only a risk, death is a certainty. (The Zulu entries for “risk” are “danger” and “a slippery surface.”) Given the frequent all-or-nothing nature of black thinking, if it’s not certain you will have an accident, then you will not have an accident. Furthermore, death is concrete and observable: We see people grow old and die. Africans tend to be aware of time when it is manifested in the concrete and observable.

One of the pivotal ideas underpinning morality is the Golden Rule: do unto others as you would have them do unto you. “How would you feel if someone stole everything you owned? Well, that’s how he would feel if you robbed him.” The subjunctivity here is obvious. But if Africans may generally lack this concept, they will have difficulty in understanding the Golden Rule and, to that extent, in understanding morality.

If this is true we might also expect their capacity for human empathy to be diminished, and this is suggested in the examples cited above. After all, how do we empathize? When we hear about things like “necklacing” we instinctively and unconsciously think: “How would I feel if I were that person?” Of course I am not and cannot be that person, but to imagine being that person gives us valuable moral “information:” that we wouldn’t want this to happen to us and so we shouldn’t want it to happen to others. To the extent people are deficient in such abstract thinking, they will be deficient in moral understanding and hence in human empathywhich is what we tend to find in Africans.

In his 1990 book Devil’s Night, Ze’ev Chafets quotes a black woman speaking about the problems of Detroit: “I know some people won’t like this, but whenever you get a whole lot of black people, you’re gonna have problems. Blacks are ignorant and rude.” (pp. 76-77.)

If some Africans cannot clearly imagine what their own rude behavior feels like to othersin other words, if they cannot put themselves in the other person’s shoesthey will be incapable of understanding what rudeness is. For them, what we call rude may be normal and therefore, from their perspective, not really rude. Africans may therefore not be offended by behavior we would consider rude not keeping appointments, for example. One might even conjecture that African cruelty is not the same as white cruelty, since Africans may not be fully aware of the nature of their behavior, whereas such awareness is an essential part of “real” cruelty.

I am hardly the only one to notice this obliviousness to others that sometimes characterizes black behavior. Walt Harrington, a white liberal married to a light-skinned black, makes some surprising admissions in his 1994 book, Crossings: A White Man’s Journey Into Black America:

“I notice a small car in the distance. Suddenly a bag of garbage flies out its window . I think, I’ll bet they’re blacks. Over the years I’ve noticed more blacks littering than whites. I hate to admit this because it is a prejudice. But as I pass the car, I see that my reflex was correct[they are blacks].

“[As I pull] into a McDonald’s drive-through [I see that] the car in front of me had four black in it. Again my mind made its unconscious calculation: We’ll be sitting here forever while these people decide what to order. I literally shook my head . My God, my kids are half black! But then the kicker: we waited and waited and waited. Each of the four leaned out the window and ordered individually. The order was changed several times. We sat and sat, and I again shook my head, this time at the conundrum that is race in America.

~~“I knew that the buried sentiment that had made me predict this disorganization was racist. But my prediction was right.” (pp. 234-35.)~~

Africans also tend to litter. To understand this we must ask why whites don’t litter, at least not as much. We ask ourselves: “What would happen if everyone threw rubbish everywhere? It would be a mess. So you shouldn’t do it!” Blacks’ possible deficiency in abstract thinking makes such reasoning more difficult, so any behavior requiring such thinking is less likely to develop in their cultures. Even after living for generations in societies where such thinking is commonplace, many may still fail to absorb it.

It should go without saying that my observations about Africans are generalizations. I am not saying that none has the capacity for abstract thought or moral understanding. I am speaking of tendencies and averages, which leave room for many exceptions.

To what extent do my observations about Africans apply to American blacks? American blacks have an average IQ of 85, which is a full 15 points higher than the African average of 70. The capacity for abstract thought is unquestionably correlated with intelligence, and so we can expect American blacks generally to exceed Africans in these respects.

Still, American blacks show many of the traits so striking among Africans: low mathematical ability, diminished abstract reasoning, high crime rates, a short time-horizon, rudeness, littering, etc. If I had lived only among American blacks and not among Africans, I might never have reached the conclusions I have, but the more extreme behavior among Africans makes it easier to perceive the same tendencies among American blacks.

How to Recognize a Jew
Most "big bad Whites" were and are actually Jews, most of them being secret Jews.
The first part explained will be physical features of the Jews. Remember that there are lots of Gentiles who have some of these features, so always put everything together before making a judgment, which includes name and character. The name, however, is only a clue, as the Jew is apt to change his name to counterfeit the resident flock; as an example, Jews in North America and England - especially Jews in noticeable roles such as marketing and finance, politics, pornography, etc. - often have surnames such as Smith, Thomas, Williams, Lewis, Taylor, Miller, Johnson, Jones, Adams, etc.
1. The most overlooked physical trait is the widow's peak as seen below.

Paul Ryan, Jew

Arthur Miller, Jew

Norma Jeane Mortensen (Marilyn Monroe), Jew

On t.v., movies, newspapers and magazines all of the supposed blonde Whites viewers see are Jews - most of them dyed blondes, and the occasional natural blonde which comes from the Jews' cross-breed ancestry. The Jews are a mixture of races (by this some do question whether the Jews form a distinct race, considering that their pedigree is a mongrel one to begin with) and therefore they possess the most disgusting traits, with the various European - including the so-called Mediterranean, East-Baltic, Nordic, Alpine, and Dinaric sub-races - in addition to the Araboid, Hamitoid, Armenoid, Mongoloid, and Negroid races characteristic of their make-up.

Marissa Mayer of Yahoo and Larry Page of Google, Jews

The hair of the Jews is usually dark and curly. This comes from the Negro blood, which all Jews have. Mayer's husband, Zachary Brogue, is an exemplary dark, curly-haired, low-forehead Jew.
Disharmonics are the key to recognition, such as curly-haired blond Jews with too-wide mouths, or many of their grotesque hooked noses flanked by slanting blue eyes.

Karl Marx, Jew

Brian Levin, Jew

Benedito de Espinoza, Jew. Those who have studied Jews' names, including the names of the African slave traders know that many Jews have Spanish and Italian names, and that many Spaniards, Portuguese, modern Greeks, and South Italians look like Jews. The Jews - mostly Sephardic Maranos - possessed the slave trade.

Angelo Buono, Jew

Al Capone, Jew

Italy was a Jews haven after Spain and Portugal expelled many clerical Jews in 1492. For thousands of years, Jews have lived in Southern Europe, and members of the so-called Italian Mafia are not Europeans, but rather descendants of Jews and slaves from the Mediterranean.
As part of the Spanish Inquisition, the king and queen of Spain, Ferdinand and Isabella, signed an edict which left most Jews with three choices: To leave, convert, or execution. Sicily belonged to Spain, and it was governed by Viceroy Don Ferdinand de Acugna; thus, Jews living in Sicily were also affected by this edict. Jews had already blended into the Spanish Gothic gentry and introduced their religion as Christianity before 1492. The Gothic nobility of Spain was innocent of the knowledge that a Jew can be an atheist or be of any religion and still be considered a Jew, and that Jews had already infested the slave trade, crime organizations, the monetary system and the lawmaking bodies.
While many Jews stayed in Spain and Portugal and converted to Christianity, the fleeing Jews went to various places - among them Holland and Italy. Al Capone’s physiognomy alone suggests he was a Jew. High-ranking Mafia crime families Bonnano, the Gambinos, Romanos, and the Colombos, are all of Jewish blood. The photographs of Gambino, Luciano, and Genovese would indicate Jewish blood. Meyer Lansky once jested that he and Charles Luciano got along together so well because Luciano thought like a Jew. The Pope’s policy of Forced Conversion led to thousands of Jews in Italy and Sicily becoming Christians. Jews have lived in South Italy from the days of the Persian Empire. Indeed, in 1400 Southern and South-Central Italy and Sicily, an estimated 30-50% of the entire people were Jews. Jews inhabited Italy since the days of Ancient Greece in small numbers. By the time the Mohammedans overtook Sicily in the 800's, Jews had lived in Sicily for 1000 years. Most Spaniards, Portuguese, modern Greeks, and South Italians are not White. Nor are the peoples of Southern Europe by any means of the same hereditary value as in Ancient times, having mixed with Jews, Arabs, Egyptians, Syrians, Turks, and other ethnicities of an inferior racial and genetic quality.

Girolamo Savonarola, Christian preacher and reformer, Jew. Severely low, slanting forehead, hooked nose, thick lips and eyebrows, high cheekbones, heavy jaw.

George W. Bush, Marano (Sephardic) Jew

Early portrait of George W. Bush, in which the common traits of his tribe are more noticeable.

Pietro de Silva, Jew

Ted Bundy, Jew

Aníbal Cavaco Silva, Jew

Jared Fogle, Jew

Emeril Lagasse, Jew

2. Attached earlobes: The ears of a Jew are often very large and low-set. They can best be described as similar to those of a rat.

Franz Kafka, Jew

Gwyneth Paltrow, Jew

Barbra Streisand, Jew

Barack Obama, Jew. The large ears, woolly dark hair, thick eyebrows, thick lips and low forehead were a giveaway from the beginning - but again, since every Jew has Negroid ancestry, the Jews have best been able to disguise within the African body.

3. Chins:

There are two chins most common among Jews. The above specimen has a feeble, receding chin.
Jews in t.v. and magazines tend to have pointed but weak chins. The specimen below has the heavy jaw - complete with thick lips and high cheekbones - traits which come from the Jews' mongrel ancestry, and which are popularized in the Jews' fashion market.

Angelina Jolie, Jew

4. Jewish lips are usually thick, with the lower lip often protruding.

Lisa Rinna, Jew

Megan Fox, Jew, photograph before surgical and cosmetic enhancement. Her surname is an adaptation of Fuchs (Fox in Yiddish). This photograph was taken when she was sixteen years old. Does she exhibit mongrelized Jewish features? Yes. The arched eyebrows, the lizard eyes, the narrow forehead, the full lips and the broad cheekbones.

Scarlett Johansson, half-Jew playing the role as Nordic woman.

5. Another obvious feature is the low, slanting forehead which is common among Jews as well.

Adolf Hitler, Jew. Short, angled neck. Dramatically low, slanting forehead. Heavy superorbital ridges. Thick eyelids. Ugly nose. Broad cheekbones. Dark hair. Ears of a rat. In combination, these traits add up certainly to a Jew.

Benito Mussolini, Jew, early mugshot in prison. Looking at this picture of grotesquerie, it's easy to see why there are so few close-up portraits of his face: Lips very thick (this alone excludes him from European status), eyelids thick, hair and eyes dark, jaw heavy, cheekbones broad, forehead low and slanting, back of the head flat.

Francisco Franco, Jew

Ante Pavelic, Jew

Emperor Hirohito, Jew

Joseph Dzhugashvili Stalin, Jew

Vladimir Putin, Jew

Zac Efron: Mischling Jew playing the role as White man. The low forehead, thick, dark eyebrows and full lips are clues.

Pat Buchanan: another Jew promoting the falsehood that "the problem is 'Israel' and the 'Zionists', not all Jews". Low forehead, dark hair, slanting dark eyes, broad cheekbones, convex nose, thin upper lip, ears of a rat.

David Beckham, "English" Jew. The most "White-looking" Jews are in Western Europe, where the Jews have been selectively breeding with Whites since the 19th century, and choose those Jews whose mongrel blood more often expresses White physical features to be athletes, doctors, politicians, lawmakers, actors, fashion models, etc. pretending to be White.

Tim Marlow, art commentator, Jew. Tim Marlow's career is an additional Jews-clue. Most of the Gentiles in dubious industries such as law, fashion, theater, psychology, print and electronic advertising, pharmaceuticals, art, journalism, sexual counseling, and so on are NOT Gentiles. They are Jews disguising as Gentiles. Being of cross-breed descent, the Jews incline primarily toward those careers that involve the domination and exploitation of peoples. All of these Jews have been employed to deceive us.

Bertrand Russell, Jew
Like most Jews, Russell had a family history of mental disorders, which included psychosis. He also was an atheist, and he wrote in his autobiography that his two main interests were religion and sex. He was another Jew who was an atheist and who had an obsession with religion and sex.
6. High and flat back of the head: This feature is often easier to pick up on if you spot the slanting head first.

Ludovico Sforza, diplomatist, patron of Leonardo, regent (1480-94) and duke of Milan (1494-98), Jew

Theodore Rosenfelt (Roosevelt), Jew

David Barger, Jew

Lancelot Ware, Jew

Ware was a lawyer - a clue. He was also the co-founder of Mensa, an elite society of people whose IQ's are among the top 2% in the world.

Edward Snowden, Jew

Skull of a fetus of Jewish lineage.

The high back of the head, just like many other traits frequently found among Jews, is very common in premeditative criminals and habitual liars.

Jews are more likely to bald as they age and their hairline recedes, giving the impression of a high forehead in frontal aspect. This false peculiarity is amplified by the high back of the head.

Francois-Marie Arouet (fake name "Voltaire", who also adopted the name "Rabbi Akib" at a later age), Jew.

Yes, Arouet was another name-changing Jew, and this is clued by his physical traits (an article will be published describing his deceitful life so as to confirm this claim). He did not "look like" a Jew, did he? Has not "Voltaire" been painted as an "antisemite"? Has Arouet not done more "good" for the world than "bad"? His forehead seems high, doesn't it? That's because a fellow Jew painted that portrait of him.

A side view of the death mask of Arouet ("Voltaire") shows his deformed head structure. The plaster moulding of his face displays a very low forehead and a slanting, high back of the head, with the great mass of the brain located in the animal region. That's the head shape of a criminal - the same case for most Jews.

Alan de Botton, Jew

Louis Sachar, Judeo-indoctrinating children's writer

Marc Randolph, Jew

Randolph co-founded the propaganda streaming service Netflix.
7. The most well-known feature is the convex nose.

Do not forget, with the vast wealth the Jews possess, many opt for plastic surgery in reducing the size of and changing the hooked shape of their noses. Also note, of course, that not all Jews have this nose shape. "Ashkenazi Jews", who generally have more of the Armenoid blood, from which this kind of nose among the Jews is largely derived, are more prone to have this nose type.
8. Thick eyelids: The Jews' eyelids are mostly thicker and more fleshy than ours. Their look is wary and piercing. One can tell from the eyes that the Jews are a deceitful people.

David Berkowitz, Jew

Elie Wiesel, Holocaust® survivor

Edward Goldenburg, Jew

Golda Meyerson, Jew

9. The arms and legs of a Jew are often very short. The body height of the Jews is usually large in proportion to the legs. Many Jews have bow-legs and flat feet. These qualities are result of the Jews' Mongoloid infusion.
On the stature of the Jews: It must be borne in mind that differences in human height are far more influenced by a subject's environment than other attributes hitherto mentioned. A much more thorough examination of the genetic disposition of the Jews can be treated through the shape, dimensions, and measurements of the cranium.
Other traits:
One can recognize a Jew from his movements and behavior. His voice is often high pitched and he tends to speak through his nose. We hear this very often in the debates and oral arguments on television.

The Jew has a very strong inclination to argue, and to lie, as well as to twist and pervert the facts, when they are presented in his disfavor. The Jew is a master of telling lies, and of twisting the truth in matters to his own convenience.

The Jew is extremely deceptive. The Jew's languishing desire for "empathy" (which is a term invented by the Jews) is unrivaled. The Jew is an unceasing beggar of empathy and plays the role of the eternal sufferer in order to gain the favor of others. The immense number of Jews one sees within the fields of politics, education, advertising, promotional marketing, psychology, theater, and other positions of authority, testifies to the Jew's fixation with controlling and exploiting the minds of the peoples of the land in which he resides.

The Jew often has a strong preoccupation with sexual intercourse, and other ill-bred or generally repulsive topics - hence, the extremely high prevalence of Jews within fields that involve allusions or references to these topics, such as gynecology, sexology, sexual therapy, and so forth.
The Jews often move their hands and head when speaking. They often have a shift or uncertain gait.

The Jew has endless genetic afflictions. Among Jews, genetic mental retardation (or "autism", as the Jews call it) is disproportionately common. Jews suffer from mental illnesses in very high proportion to their population. For example, obsessive-compulsive disorder, bipolar disorder, histrionic disorder (a type of disorder involving excessive exaggeration, make-believe and a general inclination towards deception), and psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia, are rampant among Jews.