I do not necessarily agree with the law of the land. If I were in the judge's position, I would be likely to render a similar decision - which is why I am unlikely to be appointed as a judge. Personally, I believe this country needs far more JESUS and far less tolerance of disrespect of Him
Just wanted to point something out... <a href="http://www.religioustolerance.org" target="_blank">www.religioustolerance.org</a> is a site that I have looked into before. If you think that the site gives credence to your views, I would suggest that you might wish to pick a less anti-Christian site next time.
[Replying to a story in which a <a href="http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050526/NEWS01/505260481">judge rules parents may not expose son to Wicca beliefs</a>]
<p>Well, it's not politically correct, but I believe that the only god deserving of praise and worship is MY God. I think other gods are at best figments of men's imaginations. I think worshiping other gods is dangerous, particularly in terms of eternal destiny. I wouldn't wish that on anyone, particularly a child. It makes me angry to see children exposed to such lies.
Christianity isn't like your Wiccan/Pagan religion where the teachings range all over the place and the word Pagan or Wiccan really doesn't describe much at all
A child brought up in a turmoil of adults telling him/her opposing 'this is true' [Wicca and Christianity] only increases moral relativism. Its not too far a step from there to justify whatever deviant behavior the child wishes to do.
I don't know when the Great Commission was ruled unconstitutional, but that's when Christians lost their right to freely practice our "religion."
The "Nobel" peace prize committee and scientific journals are obviously anti-Christian or non-Christian, no?
Did I say the cosmos had some kind of blow job?
DARWINISM IS ON THE RETREAT, AND IS NO LONGER IN A POSITION TO DECEIVE THE WORLD!Darwinism suggests that transitional fossils exist when they do not ... It offers invalid proofs ... [edited for brevity] by way of proteins, the chances of which themselves coming into existence by chance are 1 in 10950, in other words "an impossibility." [more brevity] For Darwinism, chance is a deity that works miracles. In these works you can see how the dark spell of Darwinism has been eliminated...................................
How about this, then. The split [between the times when physics did and did not apply to Eden] was not instant, but perhaps never really was completed till during the flood!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This makes it entirely possible, as the merged laws were different. Presto- all arguements hitherto used against a canopy no longer valid!!! I like that. With science, then being neutered, this leaves only objections of a biblical nature to be a possible theory killer here.(?) But that's not going to happen, I am almost positive! So, evos, check, and MATE!!
Sorry if I'm not up on the loonie tune theories. I don't believe in any gaps, just 6000 years. And a known spirit world, that has known effects on the physical!
[Responding to user remarking "Strike One: You don't have anything beyond your own speculations."]
<p>No. Trying to have solid evidence of something not solid, is not strike one, it's batty. Especially when you disregard the Homerun of Jesus, and all the other innings, where the physical only strikes out!