Many powerful men through history had homosexual tendencies. Male sexuality is wild and can't be constrained. That being said, heterosexual relationships are inherently oriented towards the creation and the regeneration of civilization, and I personally see homosexuality as a waste of masculine energy. If you're really attracted to the feminine, why not date the real thing i.e. feminine women instead of twinks? I feel like part of the thrill for some gay dudes is in taking somone's masculinity, which is pretty disordered. We should be helping our brothers, not participating in their feminization. That being said, the red pill generally isn't looking towards marriage either, so it's a wash. I'm also suspicious of anything gay related because of its association with political and social Marxism. Would I have a beer with you? Absolutely. You seem like an alright guy. I won't pat you on the back for your sexual proclivities though.
36 comments
"If you're really attracted to the feminine, why not date the real thing i.e. feminine women"
Okay, what if I'm not attracted to the feminine?
@anevilmeme & anothga:
If you're really attracted to the feminine, why not date the real thing i.e. feminine women instead of twinks?
IF. You're so close to getting that gay isn't a choice, but yet so far away.
"Many powerful men through history had homosexual tendencies. "
And you wish you could take a time machine ride back to spend a night with them, doncha?
@ anevilmeme
There's no association, obviously. These people can't even define those terms. Which is why they think that any causes remotely perceived by them as liberal, such as social programs, are Marxism and socialism. And, as those whom they consider to be lefty Marxists/socialists (ie, Democrats) also support gay rights (or are gay themselves), it follows that gay is "associated" with Marxism and socialism.
"I feel like part of the thrill for some gay dudes is in taking someone's masculinity".
Of course, your "feelings" about a subject you know nothing about have to be fact, right?
"Male sexuality is wild and can't be contained." If men are such unruly beasts, why haven't we just gotten rid of them? Oh, right. Because that statement only applies to a narrow subset of men.
>> I won't pat you on the back for your sexual proclivities though.<<
"On the back"? Not exactly what you were thinking about there, was it, Twinky?
Male sexuality is wild and can't be constrained.
Therefore all men should be locked away to prevent them from doing something they really shouldn't... and yet a huge number of men around the world manage to constrain this unconstrainable sexuality.
In other words, stop trying to justify your desire to rape by tarring all males with the same brush.
@New Face of Rev
What's MGTOW?
I'm also suspicious of anything gay related because of its association with political and social Marxism.
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, over?
And the big question that you've been unable to answer, why would they do that anyway?. Either male sexuality is wild or female is wild too, if you're going to call them effeminate. You can't have both.
Sexuality, whether male or female, is wild and can't be constrained, stupid. Heterosexual relationships are inherently oriented towards relationship with a person of the other gender. That is all. What you personally see is of no interest to anybody but you.
If you're really attracted to the feminine (being male), then you're heterosexual.
All of the thrill for most gay dudes is in being attracted to a person of the same gender. Sounds exclusively masculine, to me.
Red pill?
Homosexuality is a sexual orientation, and has just as much to do with Marxism as heterosexuality does. I'd say most Marxists are straights, actually.
That's ok, dearie; no-one is going to pat you on the back for YOUR sexual proclivities, either.
Gay sex makes both me and my partner feel more masculine. For some reason, I have a feeling that if you watched a couple of bearish dudes having at each other, you'd understand why a lot more than you'd care to admit. Too bad I ain't inclined to to put on that kind of show for an audience.
"I won't pat you on the back for your sexual proclivities though. "
I neither want nor need your validation.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
