"The homofascists in American society don't want it to be known that, dissociating with someone because of their behavior and oppressing someone because of the color of their skin are two vastly different things. Vastly different."
Ah, but denying rights to either group based on such criteria is the exact same fucking thing. Aside from that, it's not their "behavior" that's the problem but their sexual orientation. Two "vastly different" things, as I think you'd agree.
"The definition of a bigot used to be a person who thought that he/she was superior to a person of color."
That's not what my dictionary says...
big·ot [bígg?t]
(plural big·ots)
noun
intolerant person: somebody with strong opinions, especially on politics, religion, or ethnicity, who refuses to accept different views
[Late 16th century. < French]
Then again I'm not using the Homophobic Moron edition.
"This definition has been changed in an attempt to silence those who acknowledge the truth about sexual behavior."
Note the "[Late 16th Century. < French]" portion of the above? That says you're full of shit.
"When a gay person calls a straight person a "bigot," they are stealing the nobility of the African-American civil-rights movement."
Oh, for the love of your god. How fucking stupid do you have to be to fall for this? You're really trying to portray homosexuals as racists because they call you a bigot?
Actually, you might have a hell of a spin for Faux News on your hands. This sounds like something they'd run with...
"When were homosexuals taken from their homeland and sold into slavery? When were homosexuals forbidden to learn to read or forbidden to vote? When were members of the GLBT community denied the right to own property or relegated to the back of the bus? When were gays systematically and legally denied service in hotels and restaurants. When where there water fountains with signs reading "Straight people only?" Isn't equating race with behavior the epitome of racism?"
No. But you keep trying. With all that typing at least you're busy doing something other than harassing homosexuals.
"How can I support people that define themselves by their sexual activities when such activities should remain private?"
If they should remain private then stop making fucking laws in regards to it you blithering jackass.
"How can I interface with a mind that sees homosexuality and heterosexuality as the same when billions of human beings, including "gay" people, walk the Earth as a result of heterosexuality and not one human being has been born as the result of a same-sex union?"
So, a biological impossibility somehow so totally confuses you that your simple mind somehow can't grasp the other person's position on human sexuality? You're a strange one.
"How can I get along with someone who rejects their own genitals?"
Eh?
"How can I remain silent when men who have sex with other men insult me?"
Tremble slightly, perspire, break eye contact and seethe with impotent rage--but don't dare react too forcefully as you might get your ass handed to you. You know, just like you react when men who have sex with women insult you.
Drop the pseudointellectualist facade and slide into the internet tough guy routine instead. I have a feeling it would suit you better and, likely, more closely match your fantasies about how you'd react in real life.
