Peter Hitchens:

"There's only one lasting, simple welfare reform package this country needs. It goes like this. First, an announcement that nine months from today, all benefits of any kind for new unmarried mothers should cease.

Note the word 'new'. Existing victims of one of the stupidest policies in human history should continue to get their handouts and subsidised homes until their children are grown. It is not their fault, or their children's, that they were misled by weak and wicked politicians into this way of life.

They should not be condemned or harassed."

Why not? Is Peter Hitchens afraid of SSMs [Slut Single Mothers]? Is he afraid his wife and her friends will disapprove of his proposing taking any stronger action against these irresponsible and promiscuous women who are the equivalent of cancer cells in any society? What does his wife think should be done about SSMs? Nothing?

Clearly, if she disapproves of his views on SSMs she might give him a hard time, or even divorce him for holding views she dislikes. Perhaps that is why he is afraid of proposing doing anything more than just leaving these bastard-bearing sluts alone.

As we can see from reading http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20130526/focus/focus3.html tolerating illegitimacy is tantamount to inviting a cancer to grow in your body and inviting members of your society to become an inferior race.

SSMs can still work in brothels after the Equality Act 2010 is repealed. It is one of the twin pillars of feminism. Once no-fault divorce is also done away with, then both legs of feminism will be cut away from her, and this foul pernicious ideology finally die a well-deserved death.