Some males do have a right to a female’s body.

Husbands have a right to their wives body. Vis versa too. 1 Corinthians 7:4

Unborn boys have a right to their mother’s body.

What I've Ditched

1. Male-centered thinking. 

For example, I believe in socialism. For women. In our own societies with no men. The subjugation of women caused private property, not the other way around. It's more basic. The Marxists think the sex-based oppression of women -- if they can even recognize it as sex-based anymore -- is all about economics and not physical power and thus if we do away with class distinctions and establish a world composed entirely of shared property, male violence against and control of women will just sort of metaphysically disappear. They don't recognize the obvious primacy of our different biology as a causative agent. They're fucking delusional that way. Only women can truly understand our own oppression. I am also done trying to save the world. Those who claim we have to save the world to end our own class oppression as women can only reach this conclusion by conflating our interests with those of our oppressors: men. 

Marxists can never and will never solve the natural conflicts of interest that exist between working class men and women as a whole. Only by removing men from the equation can you bring labor interests into consistent alignment with those of women. 

Woman wears clothing that invites men to look at her in a sexual way.
Woman struts her stuff to show off her body in an area that's not so safe.
Woman gets raped.
Sure, the guy is definitely at fault, but sometimes it takes two to make something happen. Maybe if women would dress a bit more conservatively, maybe if women wouldn't be showing off their body so much, maybe if women would watch what they're doing at parties and such, we'd see a lot less rapes.

Do you walk down the streets of the ghettos at night wearing an armani suit, and carrying a briefcase full of cash? Of course not. That'd be inviting a mugger to rob you blind.

…
Doesn't matter if it is a robbery, rape, murder, there's the person who commits the crime... and then there's the person who the crime is committed against.
If the latter invites the former by being an easy target, or an attractive target, then the latter is partially contributing to the crime.

Everybody has a responsibility to act maturely and in such a way that they are protecting themselves from such crime. Sometimes crime happens anyways even if you do take all the precautionary measures, but if you do something absolutely stupid and you become the victim of a crime... then yes, you're partially to blame for it.
Everybody is responsible for their own personal safety. This includes women and skimpy clothing. There's no reason to wear skimpy clothing other than to get men to lust after them. Is it really THAT big of a surprise when a woman who was wearing that trashy clothing gets raped? Now, obviously, if a woman was not wearing trashy clothing and still got raped... then no, she's not at fault (unless she did something else stupid, like drinking at a party or something) at all.
…
If you're a woman wanting to avoid being raped, then yes... you should not be wearing skimpy clothing and perhaps you should be avoiding parties and drinking. Perhaps if the woman in question weren't wearing trashy clothing, men might have a little more respect for her, eh?

got an assignment for all y'all

start using the phrase "feminist power fantasy", and when asked simply state "it's the fantasy that feminists have where they're smart, liked by everyone, and are able to put down all of their detractors with witty words ... things which aren't true and they wish were the case."

doing so will trigger the shit out of feminists and, therefore, cause it to meme hard.

The moment you start victim blaming, is the moment you make it much easier for rapists to actually get away with it. You can recognize that it's dumb to act in a manner that would entice people, but in the end a no means no. I also clearly said 'act', because I don't believe that dress is a valid way of enticing people. Just because a girl is wearing a tiny dress doesn't mean she is trying to entice men.

Lovecraft's: “Sorry but as soon as she willingly starts making choices to do things that will incapacitate herself from protecting herself (getting blackout drunk with strangers and shooting up drugs), then she has to shoulder some of the responsibility. Honestly think how much people would learn if they figured out that bad choices lead to horrible consequences. “

Xaelai: “Praytell why ELSE she'd be wearing skimpy clothing?

I can't think of a single practical use for wearing skimpy clothing other than trying to look sexually pleasing to men. Unless she's Bi or lesbian or something and trying to look nice to other girls, but still. Is there really a need to be walking around in public dressed like that? “

We should remove all women from every form of government, and revoke their right to vote. There is reason as to why there suppressed in every culture. They are to emotional drones its in the DNA.

. A young woman from Norway, 24-year-old Marte Deborah Dalelv, naively thought she could do the same in Dubai, but was shocked to learn that what passes for "rape" in Norway is criminal conduct for women in Dubai. The courts in Dubai didn't agree that her story constitutes rape, and sentenced her instead to 16 months in prison for fornication and drinking alcohol.

….
One side of a story is almost never accurate, and here we only have the woman's story quoted. Even so, Marte's story does not add up to rape even if she is telling nothing but the truth. She describes only token resistance in going to the man's hotel room before willingly going to bed with him, and then blacks out and implies no resistance at all until she has her regrets the next morning as she wakes up naked. There is no violence; only drunkenness and regret. The case could hardly be more stereotypical of regretted drunken sex redefined in retrospect as rape thanks to feminist rape law -- minus the feminist law. The accused rapist is just a normal, persistent man, behaving like I have done many times and any of us would. Only with perverse, misandristic laws can this be rape, and I am pleased that Dubai rejects the hateful precepts of feminist rape law that Marte thought she could get away with.
…
Marte Deborah Dalelv was at worst taken advantage of while drunk and careless, like any normal man would do, but she was not raped. I am happy that she is now experiencing a backlash for her hateful attitude that she is entitled to have men imprisoned for our normal male sexuality.

The Daily Wire Is Quietly Shooting a Pro-ICE Movie. We Got the Script.

The film, with the working title Pawn Shop, centers on an Antifa siege of a Minneapolis pawn shop amid anti-ICE unrest. On one side: an ICE agent joined by a group of pawn-shop employees and customers. On the other: a rabble of progressive protesters, and eventually a bloodthirsty MS-13 death squad, both intent on rescuing a Hispanic man detained by ICE. It plays out exactly how you’d expect it would.

The film’s first minutes will likely get the most attention. As Pawn Shop opens, two ICE agents in Minneapolis arrest the Latino man, later revealed to be an MS-13 boss. Dimwitted liberal activists film and scuffle with the agents as they try to take their suspect away.

Then the film’s Renée Good stand-in enters, slamming her Subaru into the ICE van. Described with the subtlety of a brick as “MELANIE (40), a fat blue-hair,” the woman, blasting NPR, revs up again and fatally hits ICE agent “Juan” with her car. Then his ICE partner, “Mike,” shoots her in a justifiable killing.

Melanie reacts to the drawn gun with panic...

She MASHES on the gas as she throws the car into reverse, accidentally SLAMMING Juan out of the way. He goes flying into the gutter, bleeding...

And as the car reverses, Mike FIRES TWICE through the

windshield...

The first shot takes the [sic] Melanie in the neck, below her covid

mask. The second in the head, above her covid mask.

Blood SPLATTERS on her PASSENGER’s (40s, female, overweight)

forehead and matching covid mask.

From there, the ICE agent drags his suspect into the pawn shop, with an Antifa mob hot on their heels. The stage is now set for a siege, during which numerous Molotov cocktails will be thrown and shotgun shells will fly. Rest assured that no liberal piety will survive.

Inside the pawn shop, we meet its grizzled Hispanic owner and his son, newly back from college and majoring in Chicano studies. Much to his father’s chagrin, the son is dressed in a Che Guevara shirt and “listening to a POP SONG unfitting for a man.” A pawn-shop security guard quips they’re lucky the boy didn’t get a sex change.

Alright so let's put this into terms you can understand.
A guy could walk into the party, take a date rape pill himself, lay down buck-naked and spread-eagle on a bed before he passes out and still be completely 0% at fault.
Better? Because both are true, it doesn't mean they weren't stupid actions, but when someone is raped it is due to the aggressive actions of another person NOT their own. Doesn't matter the gender, or the situation.
Na-ah. Millions of people have aggressive sex every day. It is our biology. It is just some stupid attention whore cunts learned how to gain notoriety in some modern societies while doing so.

So, in your opinion, what is required for something not to be treated "rape"? Signed waiver?
Should next time I come home late and see my wife sleeping in some sexy wear be afraid of touching her because she clearly didn't gave me any consent yet?

That is a FANTASY, and it is NOT rape by any means. Men have the fantasy too.

The only difference between "fantasy" and "rape" is whatever she liked her fucker or not. And that's royally fucked up part.

Originally Posted by Crissi
"Consent need not be expressed, and may be implied from the context and from the relationship of the parties, but the absence of objection does not of itself constitute consent." Wikipedia

[Url=https://www.mmo-champion.com/threads/1276650-CNN-grieves-that-guilty-verdict-ruined-%E2%80%98promising%E2%80%99-lives-of-Steubenville-rapists?p=20548464&viewfull=1#post20548464]Being at underage party with alcohol drinks is a "there's very likely there will be sex" situation in my book. Going there instead of staying away is pretty much implied consent. And please, don't spout nonsense "she couldn't know that!" Pretty much every girl know that at about 13 yo nowadays if not sooner.

[In response to a Matt Walsh video about the Cornell rape incident and women on TikTok proclaiming themselves to be Jane Doe]

WE MUST REPEAL THE 19TH AMENDMENT!
Western Civilization and our National Security are threatened by the 19th Amendment.

Young Man Is Wrongfully Punished For Experiencing His First Love

1. Juvenile-Related Sex Laws Without Any Sense Of True Justice

As I was browsing around on YouTube last night, I came across this one video of a sentencing hearing involving a young man who had sexual intercourse with his girlfriend four different times. Did he forcibly rape her? No. Did he coerce her into having sex? No. Did he sexually molest her? No. Did he even groom her? No. His girlfriend was his first love.

Nonetheless, none of those facts made any difference to the judge. This young man had already pleaded guilty to a sexual offense, and the only thing that she was interested in was the fact that he was 23 years of age and his girlfriend was only 12 years old. Now, I know what many of you are going to say, but watch the video first and then form your own opinions about this matter.

The name of the 23-year-old defendant is Hector Enrique Laura Sanchez. He is an immigrant from Honduras. You may think that a 23-year-old man is way too old to be intermingling with a 12-year-old girl. However, back when the late Loni Anderson, an actress, was 12 years old, she dated a 22-year-old man. Her parents allowed the courtship. Of course, the late Ms. Anderson was a full-figured woman by then.

The criminal defense attorney even stressed that the 12-year-old girl that Mr. Sanchez had sexual relations with was physically precocious for her years and had an enriched sexual vocabulary. He also pointed out to Judge Stephanie Boyd that the girl told the police that she had been the one to seduce Mr. Sanchez rather than the other way around. The girl's mother didn't want him to go to jail or prison.

Some of you may argue that this girl was just a child. According to medical science, she wasn't. There is a world of a difference between a 12-year-old girl who is an adolescent and a prepubescent child who may be only 5 or 6 years of age.

Gender roles for men should absolutely continue to be enforced

Of course I don’t think we as a society should continue forcing the restrictive and oppressive gender roles we historically pushed into women, but men (and women) absolutely benefit from men being held to theirs, that’s just the way it is. I mean all of it, keeping their hair short, dressing like they care about themselves, dedicating themselves to a career and a family to provide for, all are pro social requirements in my mind. If you think this is problematic you are probably just blinded by privilege and fortunate enough to not know true oppression.

TLDR: male gender roles are good, actually, sorry incels.

http://www.abcactionnews.com/stories/2004/06/040622teacher.shtml
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/5299732
Recently in Florida a 23 year old female teacher has been accused of having sex with a 14 year old boy

Im not sure how people got this reversed, but she was not the one in the position of power; he was. As soon as they had sex, he had the power over her, not the other way around. He, literally, was fucking authority. He had her career in his hands at the same time he had other things.

What power had she over him? What, give him an F in reading class? 14 year olds arent stupid, the kid had to be aware that she had far more to lose than he did. No, the power was in his hands. If anything, I think a good case could be made that this is an issue of a male taking advantage of a female when she was in an emotionally delicate state. Show me a 14 year old who is stupid enough to think a junior-high or high-school teacher can have a lasting bad effect on them enough to be coerced into having sex and Ill show you a 14 year old in 5th grade.

Hell, [bshes only 23, barely out of childhood herself. The older I get, the less of a difference I see between a 23 year old and a 14 year old. Kids are kids.

And yes, I for one recently have a daughter. I believe, and will tell her so, that if something feels good, and she think she wants to try it, to go for it. Thats how one learns. If she doesntlike it, great. If she does, great. But then Im raising a human being, not a unit.
Who the hell cares if some people have sex a year ealier than the norm? So the hell what? Not being like everyone else is something to be proud of, not worried about.

CADdie: “I lost my virginity at age 18 to a 14 year old girl who was more mature and experienced than me, and she never turned out to be a mental wreck later.

If a 14 year old girl would want to have sex with me today, I'd probably do it.”

Squishyfish”I should just point out that there exist cultures in which parents arrange for their children to have sex with older members of the community, as part of a rite of passage into adulthood.

I would assume that if sex with an older person was innately harmful, these cultures would have self-destructed long ago.”

Chickenlegs:”What pisses me off the most is when you get these teens, say 15 or 16, and they go around sleeping with as many men as they feel like it. Then they sleep with some guy that is like 21 and people point to the guy like he did something wrong. Hey, I say if a teenager is going around getting guys to sleep with em then put the blame where it belongs, right on the teen. None of this, "Oh, he is 21, he should know better." Ill tell you what he knows, he knows that an attractive young energetic girl with boobs wants to sleep with him. Thats what he knows.”

White, Christian, American man:

Soon a “jury of your peers” will mean “fellow humans”—a feminist, a Muslim man, a Hindu woman, a gay Mexican, and a black atheist.

Multiculturalism will destroy America.

That's why female vocalist is a mistake for metal bands. They dance to the song as if they're singing Brittney Spears songs. They keep smiling throughout the song or concert like they're in Disney club

Republican congressional candidate Brandon Herrera implied COVID-19 “wasn’t bad enough” because not enough obese people died. The remarks were made during Herrera’s appearance on Elijah Schaffer’s Slightly Offensive on July 31, 2022, approximately a year before his first congressional run.

The conversation began with the participants discussing diversity on romance and dating shows and whether contestants’ racial preferences affected which people were eliminated before turning toward obesity. After the host said white men prefer to date white women over Black women, Herrera said, “I wonder if they’re solving for all variables here. Because there’s also like an obesity epidemic in the female Black community. So it’s like, okay, well, maybe …did you show them like a 100 random Black women and they just maybe don’t like obese people?”

After another participant, TimCast producer Lisa Jackson, then explained she hates obese people alleging she was being bullied by them when she was younger because she was skinny. Herrera then joked that perhaps they “hated you because there wasn’t enough of you to eat.”

Jackson then repeated that she hated “fat people” and “especially fat women” and called them “the most undisciplined, freaking disgusting people ever,” telling them to “stop putting food in your mouth.” Herrera appeared amused during the unhinged rant.

Host Elijah Shaffer then said, “Brandon’s like, shit, this is not helping my life.” However, Herrera then affirmed the sentiment: “No, no, I’m here for it, dude. I’m of the opinion COVID wasn’t bad enough because if you had something that just unfairly targeted fucking fat people, I’m here for it,” Herrera said. He then added, “I would have worn my mask nowhere on purpose.”

Herrera is the Republican candidate in Texas’ 23rd Congressional District, where he is running against Democratic nominee Katy Padilla Stout.

Are you overweight, over the age of 25, or a mother of young children, and insist on your dating profile that any man who approaches you be over six feet tall, have perfect teeth, and make over $100,000 a year?

If you answered yes, you're the reason why so many men today would rather play video games than spend time with women.

Do you have tattoos, dyed hair, a nose ring or piercings? Are you planning to get tattoos, dyed hair, a nose ring or piercings? Do you dress provocatively in order to attract male attention, but respond with outrage when men whom you consider to have lower status than yourself give you their attention?

If you answered yes to any of these questions, you're the reason why so many men today have lost all respect for women.

Did you vote for Hillary Clinton, the impostor Joe Biden, or Kamala Harris in any of the last three presidential elections? If you had been on the jury for the Lindsay Clancy murder trial, would you have voted for acquittal?

If you answered yes to any of these questions, you're the reason why women of the past were not allowed to vote or sit on juries, and why they should not be allowed to do so today.
<...>
Do you ship your children off to daycare or school every morning so you can go to work? Do you hire babysitters to watch your children at night so you go out drinking, dancing, and fornicating? Do you refuse to have children so you can go out drinking, dancing, and fornicating?
<...>
Are you in a relationship with a man but constantly looking to upgrade? Are you in a relationship with a man but flirt and fornicate with other men? Is your body count more than one? Do you even have a body count?

If you answered yes to any of these questions, you're the reason why society is collapsing, why almost every man in America today is feminized beyond repair, and why every city in the country has turned into a third-world shithole.

Be honest, face the truth - you're nothing but a gold-digging harlot.

Anyone else seeing comparisons between the Cornell allegations and the Duke allegations/the Central Park 5 allegations?
I just... I'm getting those same vibes here and we know how those latter two cases went, with the accused being found innocent.

From the September 30, 2026, edition of SiriusXM's The Megyn Kelly Show

MEGYN KELLY (HOST): It's just so wrong. Again, why? Why does the media choose to call her Jane Doe and choose to name the men. I'm just going to tell you right now, if her identity is revealed, I am going to name her. I am going to name her

I am not OK with the accused having their identities plastered all over the newspapers and accusers getting this blanket of protection from the courts and/or the media. Now the courts I can't do anything about, but the media I can

Why? Why does she get the blanket of anonymity? Even if she's a victim. I'm sorry, but that's just — that doesn't make any sense

If you really want anonymity, unfortunately you have to stay out of the court system. If you file a civil lawsuit asking for money damages, you are in the court system and your name is as fair game as the names of the defendants. And I just — I don't think we can continue this farce of pretending all accusers are actual victims whose identities must be protected and all defendants are presumed guilty, and their lives will be ruined the second the complaint is filed. This is fucked up. I'm just done with this

The truth is that the Jane Doe supporters wish she was assaulted more than wishing she was not, which proves their compassion is not out of care for her but just performative.

There has been so much back and forth regarding the Cornell 7 allegations. The side which is supportive of Jane Doe loves to preach about believing her, and the other side is quite skeptical and/or calling it a false accusation. The odd thing is people care more about being right on the internet than about her well being, and are therefore rooting for her to have been raped, and would be disappointed if she wasn’t. This proves these people don’t care about her but are just being performative so they can shout “I am Jane Doe” for attention and hating on men, similar to picking the bear.

I'm perfectly willing to admit being attracted to minors, and I challenge anyone who thinks that makes me the least bit perverted, or "sick" (I'm 25, btw). When girls sexually mature around 12-14, calling a 16 year old a "child" and trying to stigmatize the idea of being sexually attracted to her is rather dubious, to say the least. I am not, however, attracted to actual children...

Originally posted by tpg0007:
Maybe we should rethink the definition of "children."
In short, this.

------

I understand parents dislike the idea of their girls having relationships with older men, and let's be honest, parents tend to get apoplectic whenever the sexuality of their daughters (especially their daughters) is concerned, regardless of the guy's age. Fine. I'm not a parent, but I understand being protective. On the other hand, maintaining that a 15 or 16 year old girl, while no doubt somewhat immature, is incapable of having consensual sex, is nonsense.

So, Pamel, in your story, there's difficulty, because the man was already in a position of power, authority, and influence over the girl, so that may complicate things. How can anyone tell the degree to which she was coerced by him? It may be impossible, even for her, to know. I'm not sure the best way to deal with those cases. Keep in mind, however, that there's certainly an amount of coercion in every human interaction, especially where sex is concerned. So, it's muddy. I am of the opinion, however, that it's entirely possible for a 30 year old and a 15 year old to have a free, non-coercive, consensual sexual relationship. And if they do, the 30 year old shouldn't be demonized or called a pervert. It just might be tricky to tell whether the relationship is, in fact, non-coercive. I'll grant you that. Let's be clear, though (just as an aside). Even if it is, it doesn't make the 30 year old a pervert. It may make him an asshole and a bully, but there's nothing perverted (or paedophilic) about being attracted to a sexually mature individual, regardless of the age difference involved.

> Not men but little boys. I don't care what anyone says, their Y chromosome makes them more prone to evil and harm. In kindergarten the only kids who were catching small lizards and making jokes about killing birds and bugs were boys. I think that says something

> I love how everyone here draws a hard line between dindu nuffin boys and rapeapes at exactly 18. Press anyone here about when KAM starts to apply and maybe they will be agreeing when a 16-17yo is out there raping girls and women but a hard no if a 13yo, 10yo, 8yo, 5yo is out there raping/molesting girls and women. Ok so when does a male actually become problematic enough to call him a rapeape and apply KAM to him? No one here will tell you when, even if a literal 10yo is out there violently raping women like it happened in the UK and largely goes unreported in the rest of the world. Calling for the death of a violent moid? Yasss queeeeeeeeeeen Y chromosome is the problem1!!111. Calling for the death of a violent moidlet? Nooooooooooo dindu nuffins!!!! it's le society!!!! muh education!!!11!!!

I think if you can agree that the Y chromosome is the problem in adult males, you can also agree that the Y chromosome is the problem in minor males. All males are trash, and the line is definitely not drawn at 18, nor 10, nor 5. Perhaps at 2-3 years old, but at that point, if the only way for a moidlet to not be a violent rapist asshole is to be a literal toddler then why even bother with some dumb moralfag larp. Just fucking kill them all.

> So fucking real. I’m so tired of the naive libfems who think men are evil because of “male socialization” as if you can de-mutt a pitbull.

Reality is, they’re evil from birth. I also hate boymoms for coddling their little demon spawn scrotelings, like buying them custom birthday cakes with fire trucks or whatever little scrotes like on it. all this for a future rapist / porn addict who will have fantasies about raping her when he reaches puberty. Kill them all

Are you a woman? Would you like to know if your husband, boyfriend, or the guy you're dating is feminized? That's easy, give him the Fem Test.

1) Does he support legalized abortion?.
<...>
Since femininity is the opposite of masculinity, any man who favors legalized abortion is highly feminized. You'll likely never make a man out of him.
<...>
3) Does he support Israel in any form, or, worse, does he believe that Israel is "our greatest ally"?

This is similar to both of the above questions. It's impossible for a man in possession of masculine energy to support a country that terrorizes and murders women and children. (You could say that same about any man who supports our own military.) It's also a sign of incredible stupidity. Any man who does this is feminized to the point of no return.

4) Does he read or watch pornography?

This is a big one. As Henry has pointed out in the past, all pornography is homosexual. And as Saint Bruno has pointed out, anyone who persists in repeating the same sin has a demon in him. If your husband, boyfriend, or male acquaintance reads or watches pornography, he is either demon possessed, latently homosexual, or both. In other words, he is feminized to the point where you are NEVER going to make a man out of him.

5) Does he watch sports?
<...>
One of the reasons why sports are pushed so heavily in our society is to encourage feminized men to develop homoerotic "man-crushes" on their favorite athletes. The habit of men wearing sports jerseys of their favorite athletes comes from high school football, where girls wear the jersey of the boy they're dating. When you see a man wearing another man's jersey, he's telling the world that he's that player's bitch. If your man does this he is highly feminized.
<...>

9) Did he vote for Hillary Clinton, the impostor Joe Biden, or Kamala Harris in any of the last three presidential elections?

No explanation necessary. If your man did this, he is feminized to the extreme.

The solution to the fertility crisis is simple: Repeal women’s rights, and force them to have children. That’s it. That’s the solution

(Kawaiigardenerwolf)

I think ultimately at first we should see sex separated schools, women get a standard education where as males are tested to see if they qualify for standard education and eventual but limited interaction with female civilization, and the ones who disqualify are castrated and put in mines or some shit. Based on what I have studied with animals a good sex ratio is 10% male and 90% female. Just enough to prevent inbreeding.

(Spaguetti-betti)

eah, I agree they turn demonic at the start of puberty, because that's when their sexual desire and hormones flood their bodies and basically make them incapable of seeing women and girls as anything other than a source of great pleasure. Basically the orgasm for them is a high, and they constantly seek highs and have, in general more than woman, an addictive personality or nature. I have more thoughts on that, especially cause I have ADHD, I feel like I understand them better than the average woman. Castrating is not going to happen, cause males protect each other and they are in powerful positions currently. Average man hates feminists and looking for excuses to hate us more and inflict more violence on us. Average woman is a pick me and/or a boy mom, so will protect her precious rapist son from anything.

I agree with the 10% males thing. I wish it was 1%, but inbreeding :(

(Kawaiigardenerwolf)

I used to think it was puberty that made them demonic too. But in recent years and in my observation they are literally born fucked up. Usually a pre pubescent boy who is demonic is the result of environmental and genetic shortcomings, things which will cause girls to turn in on themselves, but boys to lash out. There are cases where literal 6 year old boys brought guns to school and shot their teacher or tried to strangle them. I agree with your averages, and in general I find males to be a lost cause, but I think it's entirely possible to uplift women, even ones in the depths of pickmeism, to overcome their self loathing, male worshipping programming. It might be harder to reprogram a woman who has birthed a male, due to imprinting, but I think young girls can be led down the path of self respect simply by being present as a female role model.

(Translated]

True men are stupid.

Men are supposed to make a comeback by not learning how to write, but only doing six-dildo or meat shields.

In a multi-racial country such as the United States, poop men often beat other men in the field of study.

In fact, when black men, white men, and dung men were adopted from middle-class families in the United States and raised in the same environment, they were said to have high intelligence in the order of dung men, white men, and black men.

Interestingly, in the case of women, the difference in intelligence by race was not as noticeable as that of men.

Evidence that only women are the basic form of mankind and true humans is also revealed here.

So what's the conclusion?

Black men with the highest male hormone levels, larger physique, and larger jaji are less intelligent than poop men.

Masculinity and intelligence are in an incompatible relationship.

Dumbness is a virtue for men.

The reason why Yangnam is arrogant is because he lacks masculinity and studies clumsy.

So masculinity is the best, so it has reached the point of being treated as intersex.

Therefore, the answer is to cut out the frontal lobe when a man is born to fundamentally prevent accidents.

An investigation has been launched in France after female staff at the Eiffel Tower were replaced by male colleagues for the visit of a Hindu religious group.

A delegation of around 100 people linked to the Bochasanwasi Akshar Purushottam Swaminarayan Sanstha (BAPS) group visited the iconic landmark in Paris on Saturday.

"Women were asked to leave their places of work" and felt "humiliated", staff union representative Diane Davoine said. The tower closed on Monday as staff went on strike to show their outrage.

BAPS - a movement whose beliefs originate in the 18th Century - strictly separates men and women, including in temple activities and building entrances.

Ariel Weil, who is the president of the company that runs the Eiffel Tower, blamed its managers for being "a bit overzealous" in complying with the request without considering whether it was "inappropriate".

Weil, who is also mayor of Paris Centre, told French broadcaster Franceinfo on Tuesday that the incident was "totally shocking and unacceptable".

An internal investigation will determine who was responsible for putting the conditions in place, Weil said, and ensure it "never happens again".

In a statement reported by AFP news agency, staff at the monument said that during Saturday's visit, female employees were also "instructed not to go through or cross certain areas while the delegation was present".

"Tensions mounted over the weekend, so [on Monday morning], the employees decided to meet: first, to open a dialogue with management, and second, to ensure that women are never treated this way at the company again," Davoine said.

Société d'Exploitation de la tour Eiffel (SETE), which runs the Eiffel Tower, had previously said the conditions imposed on female staff were not in line with its values "nor with the principles of equality between men and women".

Their core belief is not having any beliefs, just whatever gets them closer to their goal, namely, pussy.

They only care about the security they get through submission to authority, as the male always figures his allegiance to whatever/whoever he’s pledged himself to guarantees him the ability to reproduce eventually. If he didn’t believe this, he wouldn’t do it at all.
The authority these men want most is a sexy underaged mommydom dedicated to the task of draining him of his cum (the malfoid), which would be his most optimal path to reproduction. No middleman, quite literally. Since these unicorns hardly ever appear in reality, and leave the common man desperate and wanting, anyone and anything can hijack the male submission drive and completely obliterate whatever “beliefs” he previously purported to have. Charlatans plunder his wallet, capitalists plunder his labor, fags plunder his butt, Etc.

The male is like a little sperm swimming steadfast into darkness, using the programming that propels it towards the egg, despite the fact it’s is in another man’s intestines, or a monitor lizard, or a hole in a couch cushion.

Female privilege is a real thing

I am writing this after just finding out that Christa Pike got her execution paused at the last minute. Yes, Christa Pike, the woman who lured an innocent girl into the woods, tortured her to death, kept a piece of her skull as a trophy and tried to kill another inmate in prison. A federal court is halting her execution to consider whether her abusive childhood was taken into account. No joke, look it up.

And of course, we can't forget the Lindsay Clancy case where a woman strangled her three children to death with premeditation but was almost acquitted (and might get the case dismissed) because boohoo she felt a bit sad.

And finally, you have the Cornell hoax where a woman willingly took drugs, alcohol and engaged in group sex with some frat dudes (check the original police report) only to take back her word and claim she was forced in order to save her reputation. Now the internet wants to lynch the men accused.

Do you see the common thread in all three cases? I'll tell you, it's women not being held responsible for their actions. No matter what they do, they are the victim. And that is the conceit of feminism. It tells us women are equal to men, therefore deserving equal rights, but also women can't be held equally responsible for their actions. Well guess what, rights and responsibilities go hand in hand. If you want the same rights as men, don't complain if you are held to the same moral or legal standard! Abolish female privilege now!

I could almost feel my friend, a feminized male, flinch when I said, "The heterosexual dynamic is based on a man convincing a woman to do what he wants and her acquiescing." I had committed heresy. These words are politically incorrect in our Cabalist societal cult. Forbidden. Yet ironically they make for successful relationships while feminism usually doesn't.

As I have said, men want power; women want love. Heterosexual marriage is the exchange of the two. Women surrender power in exchange for male power expressed as love. Exclusive sex is the symbol of this contract.

I'm not suggesting a woman should acquiesce to all men (as they do sexually under feminism) but only to the man who has patiently earned her love (trust) through courtship.
If she ceases to acquiesce or he ceases to love, the heterosexual contract is broken.

The conversation turned to child rearing. My friend has a four-year-old son and remarked that he is tired of letting his son make the decisions. Children want to be told want to do, he said. Ironically, that is true of many women also. They want responsible loving leadership. Men have been emasculated. Masculinity involves taking loving charge of a woman (and children.)

In our society, there is a pathological emphasis on "relationships." We depend on other people's approval for legitimacy. Paradoxically, this over dependence on others tends to impede successful relationships. The most important relationship is with ourself. That's the only approval we need.

A woman should not be loved for her sex appeal or beauty. She did nothing to deserve them. They are gifts of nature. A woman is loved for the sacrifice she makes for her husband and children. That is a woman's love.

Cosmic dualism fallacy. Because moids are specialist mutants, they need to believe that women are their negative "counterpart" with features that are "fully opposite". It's one of the ways they fight the nagging little voice telling them that they are merely an offshoot of a standard, complete human form, not an equal puzzle piece in a symmetrical, complementary set of two. This applies to both behavior (femininity and masculinity meme) and appearance.

Because of this, their idea of beauty will always be incomplete, and everything they create will always be ugly, imperfect and uncanny in some way, no matter how hard they try. If you gave a moid a hypothetical unlimited ability to make people, he'd make a "perfect" waifu utilizing his own peferred parameters, then dump her for a naturally occurring beauty as his creation begins to look grotesque and mutilated by comparison. This is one of the reasons why a male plastic surgeon would be an enormous risk. It's not that they're lazy, bogging you on purpose, or sadly limited by current state of the art. It's that they are literally, biologically incapable of making you beautiful. They think they know what beauty is, and then don't find it beautiful, because it's not.

[From “Women”]

Putting women in charge of bearing children is like putting children in charge of their own education

Neither woman nor child is capable of impregnating themselves with virtue

Only men of wisdom and justice are qualified to command women and children

(@myu3u): My family always get pissed off when I claim I would rather die than birth a male, like sorry I care for my life and sanity

(@kawaiigardenerwolf): i mean male fetuses have been proven to be more resource intensive than female fetuses. Here's a quote from University of Cambridge:

"Male baby pregnancies are more likely to result in complications, possibly because they grow faster in the womb and require more nutrients and oxygen than supplied by the mother through the placenta”

(@myu3u): So, actual parasites

(@kawaiigardernerwolf): from the moment of conception yea basically

The Jane Doe in the Cornell University rape case could have made better decisions, and that should be okay to say out loud.

We've seemingly become so adamant to protect and comfort rape victims that we become angry when someone dares to suggest that the victim's indiscretions and bad decisions objectively played a role in their victimization. Apparently, this is commonly referred to as "victim blaming."

Whether we want to admit it or not, there are instances where blaming the victim of a crime to some degree, regardless if it's rape or not, is valid. None of us have any right or logic to live our daily lives and think that bad things can't happen to us, or that there aren't bad people who are waiting for us to slip up and let our guard down in order to take advantage of us.

It's not wrong to point out, in this case, that not enough was done on part of the victim to mitigate or minimize the risk of being sexually assaulted. Yes, we know people shouldn't rape, but pointing out the victim's indiscretions and bad decisions isn't the same as apologizing for or legitimizing rape like so many seem to think.

As much as I hate it, we don't live in a society that will ever be free from rapists. So maybe that's something we should keep in the back of our heads before we ever decide to go to a frat house full of horny men and drink and do ketamine? I don't understand the mindset that would think that anyone should be entitled to engage in risky behavior like that and be immune from danger or consequence.

The affair is embarrassing for the National Rally (RN): the municipal police officer involved is also a member of the party's security detail[…]
“I can’t take it anymore, earlier we were on Carnot, ragheads, niggers, ragheads, niggers.” Another police officer: “That’s France for you”[…]
The policeman continued: "We became Christians under Clovis, we'll become Muslims under Macron"[…]
We see a customer in a shop[…]"There you go, the little French girl working to earn a pittance, and you've got three Arabs. These guys just got a thousand euros from the CAF (family allowance office)"[…]
A video about General Bigeard[…]is playing. The commentator claims he was also a "torturer in Algeria"[…]The police officers' reaction: "So what? We screwed the Arabs, we screwed the Arabs!(…)And how many soldiers did they screw?" Another[…]asks: "So where does torture begin?" The policeman continues[…]"The guy who made this video had better watch out(…)Yeah, they're far-left, left-wing thugs, you know." I have less respect for them than for the Arabs»[…]
The police officers continued their tirade[…]“We’ve had forty years of socialism, so there’s no respect for anything at all, no respect for fathers, no respect for mothers. But hey, a father is a father, he’s the one who gets an erection, he’s the one with the muscles… Cro-Magnons worked like that. And back then, in the caves, if their men weren’t there, they’d get killed. You have to put everything in context.” They continued: “They say you colonized, but you were the first people to enslave! These monkeys sold each other between tribes”[…]
Then come the final remarks[…]"The Russians, they're coming here." Another replies: "Oh yeah, five, six years. They'll kill the sandniggers. They'll pillory Macron and all his faggots. Well, we'll be forced to drink vodka and eat caviar for a few weeks." Another voice: "We need a general with a big pair of balls[…]" Yet another: "A little coup d'état, we need a little dictatorship in France"

The Prince of Darkness admitted he may have made a big mistake, as Satan reportedly wondered if he had gone too far when he orchestrated the modern feminist movement.
"Uh, seeing how things are shaking out with this most recent news cycle, I might have overdone it," Satan admitted to his henchdemons. "I told the ladies to leave their husbands and go corporate; that sounded like a fun time. But I didn't really think they'd take it all the way to killing their kids and celebrating baby murder. This is a little grim, even for my taste."
Satan discussed his disillusionment with his friends and told them he thought he probably should have toned it down a bit.
"Feminism seemed like the perfect way to destabilize families and sow discontent in Western society. But now look at the state of things; it's gotten way out of hand. I think I need to figure out a way to put some of this back in the bottle."
Recent news about the Lindsay Clancy trial and the prevalence of abortion in the United States rocked residents of Hell, many of whom agreed with Satan. "Yeah, too far, man," said a man in hell for burning down 20 villages and eating some of the charred residents. "They're pretty twisted."
At publishing time, Satan had asked liberal women if they wouldn't mind dialing things back a bit, as their behavior had started to make him look bad.

> I’ll add genital mutilation to the list of retarded things men do just because other told them to do it, since it’s my favorite example. The history of circumcision, from its inception to today, is an excellent case study in male servility.

Women will never be as servile, submissive, and impressionable as men. A lot of people confuse the increased demands for submission and conformity on women on increased willingness from women. A lot of people also confuse the comparative lack of demands on men as lack of willful compliance, but are blind to how easily proselytized men are when it does happen.

Even the TiF argument doesn’t stand to logic. All TiFs are oppositionally defiant, self-appointed cultural rebels. They want to become men because they want the individuality, independence, autonomy, influence, power, and control they (incorrectly) believe men naturally possess.

> I don’t think males willingly circumcising themselves is an injustice. If anything I find it amusing just how easily and readily they’re duped, and proud of it. It is evidence that they are slave-minded apes who would unquestioningly follow orders, even if those orders are “remove tissue from your precious winky”. You could give me a thousand studies that unequivocally prove removing my labia is marginally more sanitary than not. I still wouldn’t volunteer to do it. The only people who would, based on this information alone, are slave-minded apes.

> Men get fucked over and stay that way, literally. Powerscrote influence seems to rewrite their brains and they rarely, if ever, question it. Scrotes get molested as kids and most of them look back on the experience fondly, gay and straight. A circumsized male child grows into an adult man who is proud to have pieces of his cock missing. They celebrate themselves when powerscrotes send them off to die in pointless wars. The whole manosphere/trad ideology is men pining and begging for a return to total powerscrote rule where they all get herded and milked like sheep.
I think men just actually like to be taken advantage of if they get validation from it, and they’re comforted when they’re around other slaves like them. It brings them this perverse sense of pride and identity.

I’d like to see a case, which I haven’t seen, where a man killed his children, and all the men came out to support him. Where is this case? No, it doesn’t exist, because leave it to some damn woman, a feminist, an ugly one, whom no one values, to come along and try to change the lives of all the other women who have their men at home, who have their families, and who have everything.
Envy is at the root of all this, and I’m telling you, I’m telling you, my dear, I’m pointing out that the biggest mistake the United States of America ever made was giving women the right to vote, because it’s because of women that we’re seeing all these disasters. It’s because of women that we’re seeing them wanting more and more to be more like I don’t know who the hell.

You Never Stand Alone
When you stand with God.
And the picture of the only juror willing to call evil what it is and hold the evildoer responsible looks pretty much like what you’d expect a man described as “arrogant” and “unwilling to listen” by a group of wicked women is going to look like. As a general rule, if all the women are for it, it’s a terrible idea and you shouldn’t listen to one single word they say, because all of them are nonsensical rhetoric intended to put emotional pressure on you.
The mob is famously stupid. And female-led mobs are downright retarded, with zero sense of self- or societal preservation. Anyhow, it’s good to see social media is taking a strong position contra the mainstream media’s push.