“but that goes to the crux of the issue of christians believing that marriage belongs to them and their god.”

Not at all - I was an atheist when I got married. Gay “marriage” is destructive on secular counts: bad for the individuals (the homosexual lifestyle is shown to be destructive by secular sources such as the CDC, etc), bad for children (who are adopted by gay “parents” as proven from secular sources), and bad for society (as religious freedoms are eroded).

“invoking darwinism is useless, of course aberrations from the norm that do not contribute to the gene pool exist.”

Thank you for admitting that homosexual behavior is a defective aberration, even on atheism!

“and you are falling into a logical fallacy by implying that gay marriage is opening the door for “two” to become more, “consenting” to become forced, and "adults" to include children”

Not at all. So, you cannot tell me why the SCOTUS “argument” in favor of gay “marriage” would preclude “more than two,” “non-consenting,” child-adult marriages, do I have that correct?