The US Constitution.
You'd have though that if the US was such a 'Christian' country, the Founding Fathers would've included at least the words 'God', 'Jesus', and 'Creator' at least. Indeed, if as you lot claim said Founding Fathers were as Christian as you claim, they'd have thrown those words around that document like confetti. Would they not...?
But not so much as word one of those words, verbatim.
...oh, and the Constitution evolving? You have [I]no[/I] idea.
And that presiding judge, John E. Jones III*, was personally appointed to the Federal bench in 2002, by the Creation-believing George Dumbya Bush; in turn, voted in - twice - by Creation-believers: the likes of you, Gaye Arsers. Hindsight is not 20-20, I think you'll find.
...but those same Founding Fathers possessed great foresight in drawing up the legal basis of your country, though; very much the progressives they were.
Kitzmiller vs. Dover. Romans 13:1-5.
Another word conspicuous by it's absence: 'Marriage'. 10th Amendment, bitches.
*- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_E._Jones_III
'In 2008, Judge Jones was awarded the American Humanist Association’s Humanist Religious Liberty Award at the World Humanist Congress in Washington, DC. In his acceptance speech, Judge Jones explained how he was blasted by Bill O'Reilly, Phyllis Schlafly, and Ann Coulter for the Kitzmiller decision. Judge Jones also remarked on the shortcomings of civics education and how the American public tends to have a limited understanding of the Constitution and the importance of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment and separation of church and state established by the Founding Fathers of the United States. Judge Jones gave his perspective on the separation of powers under the U.S. Constitution: "Articles 1 and 2 designate the legislative branch and the executive branch, respectively, as majoritarianthey are subject to the will of the people; they stand in popular elections. But article 3 is counter-majoritarian. The judicial branch protects against the tyranny of the majority. We are a bulwark against public opinion. And that was very much done with a purpose, and I think that it really has withstood the test of time. The judiciary is a check against the unconstitutional abuse and extension of power by the other branches of government." Judge Jones added that Alexander Hamilton himself remarked: “Enthusiasm is certainly a very good thing but religious enthusiasm is, at least, a dangerous instrument."'
Have you read your Constitution today?
