The Most Dangerous Lifestyle To Live
Is engaging in gay male sex. The stats on this are overwhelming. The gay lifestyle is more dangerous to your health than smoking. I won't go into the medical details about what happens to delicate tissue when it is ruptured and bacteria passes directly into the bloodstream. Nor discuss what a lifetime of repeated pounding in the back door does to the excretory system that is too disgusting to explain.
There will never be a movie made about this issue or any PSA's warning of the dangers of gay sex to human health. This is why I despise the left in America that grows increasingly dishonest and completely out of touch with reality.
41 comments
Not all male gays engage in anal sex. A lot of heterosexuals engage in anal sex. But, perhaps it's safe if done by a male on a female?
I understand that you won't go into medical details, as they would be few, insignificant and boring.
If you want a movie made, why don't you make it?
The left in America has little or no influence, as you only have two right-wing parties that effectively destroys all competition.
Last time I checked, proper sex-ed do speak of the importance of being properly lubricated before engaging in anal sex. But, perhaps you missed it, as it's not called "gay male sex".
The username is dickmarvel.
*looks around for the mysterious giggle*
My irony meter won't stop laughing.
@Swede
Could you explain this a little bit, please? We do have a left (liberals and democrats) and a right wing party (conservatives and republicans) so I'm not sure what you mean by two right wing parties.
@Mayasmom
@Mayasmom
Or put another way, our Democratic Party's really not all that 'left-wing', when looked at from a European perspective. (Despite all the Republicans who would have you believe Obama, Hillary, Sanders, and all the rest are all Marxist commie pinko bastards)
"There will never be a movie made about this issue or any PSA's warning of the dangers of gay sex to human health. "
Actually I'm pretty sure there are tons of movies and PSAs talking about the dangers of gays. They probably are filled with the same misinformation you are spewing since they came from the same source.
It's also dangerous to go skydiving or ski jumping, or participate in Nascar races, or OWN A GUN. This is why I despise the right in America that grows increasingly dishonest and completely out of touch with reality.
The gay lifestyle is more dangerous to your health than smoking.
No it's not. Do you want the law to ban smoking, too.
The movie exists. It focuses more on mental and legal issues (read: psudopsychiatry and pseudolaw) relating to homosexualiyy, but you may like it. It's entitled "Boys Beware," and was released in 1961.
Also, dickmarvel?
image
Even if there was a 'gay lifestyle' it would not consist of constant butt sex.
By the numbers, many more straight people engage in anal sex than gay.
Even the percentage is in the same range, about 40%. (However, the statistics on pitching vs catching by orientation and gender are not yet forthcoming.)
I really get the feeling "dickmarvel" had to stop himself from describing all that "repeated pounding in the back door" in further detail...
For people that claim to be so disgusted by and opposed to the very idea of gay buttsex, people like this guy seem to spend a lot of time thinking about it, and describing it.
He has a point though abstinence might be just as bad.
I'm not progressive so I have no problem at all being politically incorrect about it. Anal sex drastically raises your chances to get HIV or other diseases especially if you're taking it.
I view it as more in line with extreme sports. If you can handle the risks do it, just leave me out of it.
@FSTDT Doesn't Suck
So, when presented with the argument-annihilating facts time and again, you pussy out of debates - for fear of having to admit that you & your entire way of thinking is wrong, and start thinking like a left -winger, thus demonstrating your right-wing mental handicap-based Dunning-Kruger (otherwise, if your way of thinking is supposed to be sooooooo 'superior', why isn't the world exactly as you would wish it?! ) - to fall back on the good ol' right-wing standard of homophobia-based bigotry.
In that case, a simple question, requiring just a 'Yes' or 'No' answer: Have you ever had any Gay Impulses?
As a Politically Correct straight man who has never felt threatened in any way by gay men, or the mere thought of what they do in private, and I am pro -LGBT I can answer that extremely easily: No.
http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=115402&Page=2#1896028
@Aunty-FSTDT (a.k.a. FSTDT Sucks)
"One time Moose. It doesn't count. It was one time"
Like I say: I can answer that question extremely easily: No .
Your call, FSTDT Doesn't Suck.
Just admit it; you're not willing to go into the exact details because you don't know and are not motivated enough to do the research.
If you were consistent in your reasoning, whereby a high standard for safety in sex has to be met, you'd call for women to engage in lesbian sex above heterosexual sex.
"I won't go into the medical details..."
Says someone that's trying to make a point that gay sex is bad for the body.
Also, yet another person trying to harp on gays for a specific sex act that they associate with them. Because they couldn't think of any real arguments against them.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
