Did you know that approx the same amount of Sikhs as Muslims vote for the quite Anglophobic Labour party? It should come as no surprise if you study Sikhism as you will find that they are socialists and Hindus are only approx twenty percent behind both in voting Labour.
In our hour of need, we English need a wide researched scope of questioning and educating and not a blinkered focus on one community (Muslims) being the root of all our evils...
several elements, religious, ethnic, political and cultural are detrimental cogs turning to our disadvantage and we don't care how uncomfortable or offensive this realisation is for anyone,
these thorny issues need addressing with any PC brainwashed baggage dropped off at the liberal door
and I'm sure all will understand that we need to know who are our real friends who will support a more caring and safer nationalistic than socialist England.
(Use this link below to see how Sikhs, Hindus and Muslims etc vote to the detriment of the English community.)
http://www.runnymedetrust.org/uploads/EMBES%20Voting%20Behaviour.pdf
15 comments
So you hate Sikhs, Hindus, and Muslims because they vote Labour, and you hate Labour because they support Sikhs, Hindus, and Muslims, and you don't see the connection there? That more Sikhs, Hindus, and Muslims would vote your way if your way supported them?
But of course that's not why you hate Sikhs, Hindus, and Muslims. You hate them because you need to hate someone. You need to feel that someone else is bad so that you can feel better about yourself. People who look different are just easier to see as Other, easier to separate from yourself.
I pity how sad your life must be. How poorly you must truly think of yourself that you need this sort of feeling to cope.
"Brown people! Brown people everywhere!"
"In our hour of need, we English need a wide researched scope of questioning and educating and not a blinkered focus on one community (Muslims) being the root of all our evils... "
Translation: "We need to branch out our hatred and start hating more groups of people who aren't pasty-white!"
"these thorny issues need addressing with any PC brainwashed baggage dropped off at the liberal door"
Translation: "If facts and reality don't justify your hatred, then the facts are wrong and you should ignore them!"
"a more caring and safer nationalistic than socialist England."
Case in point.
Let me guess... UKIP supporters?
Edit: To everyone shocked at this, to be honest, I'm not that shocked. There's been numerous racist rants on trains in the UK. And given the recent events, it'll only increase. Also couldn't believe their handling of the Mauritius issue.
So, Sikhs are socialists, you ignore Muslims(because since 9\11 they have made crystal clear they are not). Have you ever thought that they vote them because they are vilified minorities and that party is te one that treats them relatively humanely?. Would you expect them to vote UKip or the English Defence League?
This reminds me of the Norwegian politician Carl I. Hagen, who for many years was the leader of 'Fremskrittspartiet' ('The Progress Party'), infamous for being anti-immigration and accused of being the party for racists.
Carl I. Hagen on
- immigrants to Norway: "They must learn Norwegian!"
- native Spanish neighbors of Norwegian senior citizens having emigrated to Spain: "They must learn Norwegian!"
@Malingspann
I'm not sure I'm reading that correctly. Did he actually say that if people move from Norway, their neighbours need to learn Norwegian, but if people move to Norway, they need to learn Norwegian? It's good to know that that particular double standard isn't limited to English-speaking countries.
"Did he actually say that if people move from Norway, their neighbours need to learn Norwegian, but if people move to Norway, they need to learn Norwegian?"
Yes, he did. Didn't exactly make himself any less of a joke to everyone who didn't support his party.
'Anglophobic', you say? In that case, why were the white Diana Johnson (Hull North), Alan Johnson (West Hull), and Karl Turner (Hull East) returned to Parliament last year - leaving the neo-Nazi National Front & equally racist UKRAP getting nowhere - with increased majorities?
And they're all Labour MPs.
...oh, and Labour 'anti-Semitic'? Professor Robert Winston: Or Baron Winston of Hammersmith.
'He sits on the Labour Party benches in the House of Lords and takes the Labour whip.'
'Religion: Orthodox Judaism'
NEXT!
If you study Sikhism you will find it has a fair bit in common with Judaism: centred on practise, family and community, with an emphasis on good deeds. These are values that our OP evidently has a lot of trouble with. And as for "a more caring nationalistic than socialist England," why do I get the feeling what he would really like would be more akin to a national socialist England?
@ Anon-e-moose
Lord Winston is evidence that Labour isn't all anti-Semitic (not because he's Jewish - Nathanael Kapner is a Jewish anti-Semite - but because he's not an anti-Semite). Especially since Corbyn's election as leader, there is plenty of evidence of Labour members, like Ken Livingstone, who are. Labour needs a lot more Naz Shahs - prepared to learn the error of her ways and understand those who are different - and a lot fewer Ken Livingstones. Then British Jews might feel able to return to the Labour Party they once instinctively supported; now just 8.5% are prepared to trust it .
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.