ok winter asked me what do i mean by an agenda- the reason why evolution got so popular was not because there has ever been any form of proof for it it is because it was a theory where in man could completely ignore a creator and feel free to live in flesh and sin.originally evolution was a RELIGION and came from babylon thousands of years ago and it is still a religion today because there is no true science behind it! infact all true science proves it to be true and many men with PHD's christian and non christian have said that this is one of the biggest hoax's ever pulled on humans. the reason that most scientists believe it is that they are sinply not willing to beleive the ONLY other option which is creation. and the truth is that not a few scienctists have lost jobs and had all publications refuse to publish there work when they have even suggested evolution to be proven untrue. Now when you spend that many years getting a degree and having a career then find out all evidence is against the theory that most accept it is a hard choice to be the one to stand up and say hey somethings not right here.
36 comments
"it is still a religion today because there is no true science behind it!"
Just when you think you've heard every stupid hypothesis there is, along comes GPAY.
Evolution was a theory proposed by Darwin who was both English and born in the 19th century and, son of a preacher himself, probably agnostic and not affiliated to any church. And it´s not a hoax. Without it, most modern inventions and advances in medicine would not be possible.
Living free in flesh and sin sounds a whole lot better than living in anger, hatred, and spite, and the overwhelming fear that other people are enjoying their lives without buckling under the terror of a bloodthirsty, psychopathic war god.
Great, here's another jerk who has no clue about science, the peer-review system, or grammar, yet feels obliged to spew forth his antiknowledge to the world on the Internet. Sometimes it's kind of funny, but the more often this happens, the more it just gets depressing.
... not a few scienctists have lost jobs and had all publications refuse to publish there work when they have even suggested evolution to be proven untrue. biblical creationism. Biblical creationism doesn't just contradict evolution; it also contradicts physics, geology and astronomy. So just disproving evolution wouldn't help.
And how many o those PhD's have one in biology and how many one in theology?
Damn it, I keep hearing about the big scientist conspiracy. I'm an evolutionary biologist, and if there's a conspiracy, I want some bribes, people. If there's some info I'm hiding, I'd better be well paid to keep it there.
Poor sentence structure puts this "paragraph" into the real of nearly incomprehnisble. and the truth is that not a few scienctists have lost jobs and had all publications refuse to publish there work when they have even suggested evolution to be proven untrue.
1) Hardly any papers against evolution even get submitted for peer-reviewed journals.
2) Those that have been submitted are laughably awful.
3) If your job is to observe the facts and understand them as best you can, and you instead ignore facts that don't fit your preconceived agenda, you are not doing your job and will probably lose your job.
4) Science has a far better track record of correcting itself and allowing dissent than religion does. Peer review, dissertation defenses - the whole idea is to have others go through and try to duplicate your results and make sure your description of them is accurate. If there is an obvious problem with your method, or your results are not independently reproduced, chances are they will be rejected.
"2) Those that have been submitted are laughably awful."
I'm confused. My comment was in reference to the few "papers" creationists have submitted to peer-reviewed journals.
As I noted in another response, any legitimate scientist would kill to be able to disprove evolution. Fame and fortune would be his! I must admit, though, that thus far the only evidence we have for the truth of evolution comes from biology, microbiology, geology, paleontology, archaeology,genetics and a few other sciences that elude me at the moment.
All Carbon 14 tests clearly point toward a Young Earth. Crosis:
Yes thats what I meant. The papers submitted were laughably awful. The submissions to FSTDT are laughably awful.
If you can find some of these submissions, send them to this website. Then we can all play
science magazine editor and
scribble red marks all over the paper.
I see.
If I happen to run across one, I might just have to do that. But it doesn't seem likely.
the reason why evolution got so popular was not because there has ever been any form of proof for it it is because it was a theory where in man could completely ignore a creator and feel free to live in flesh and sin.
Great job disproving evolution! What peer-reviewed journal can I find it in? Oh, wait, it's not in a peer-reviewed journal, it's on an Internet message board. Why? Oh, a conspiracy. Right.
@joey444All Carbon 14 tests clearly point toward a Young Earth. If I didn't know you'd posted here before, that would be going up on the site as well, I think.
I think it's a joke based on creationist arguments. Since Carbon 14 is only accurate for dating within a range of 5,000 to 50,000 years, it would make the Earth look young. (Did I get it?)
I think it's a joke based on creationist arguments. Since Carbon 14 is only accurate for dating within a range of 5,000 to 50,000 years, it would make the Earth look young. (Did I get it?)
Your religion has Babalonian roots.
And Sumerian and Egyptian roots and shaped by Greek, Roman, and European Paganism roots.
Sensible people see this as cultural literature or myth. Your God came from the same sources.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
