The only condition under which I would even consider having sex or sexual contact with the child is if I believed that the child wanted it (of their own free will) and would enjoy it (and probably also only if the child initiated it). I have never had that occur. If it did I would not consider it molestation and I would have no moral issues if I had sex with the child
12 comments
"... I would have no moral issues if I had sex with the child."
Since a child cannot give consent because (1) legally too young to make adult decisions, and (2) not really aware of all the consequences, therefore it could never be properly "informed" consent, I suggest you shift your attentions to adults, completely. You know perfectly well that the longer you obsess about kids, the more likely it is that you will cross that line. So get out, NOW, and redirect your lust somewhere else before you ruin both your own life and that of a child.
Oh by the way, don't move to my neighborhood.
from a previous post of the same user
If your worried about me not being able to control my sexual feelings, just make sure none of the kids are girls between the ages of 8-13 -
...and yet you give warnings of not hiring him to watch children between 8 and 13. I'm going to go out on a limb here and say it's because before 8 they're too childlike in their thinking and after 13, they understand what you're doing.
Hey, that 'he started it' defense didn't work when you were five. You know, back when your mom insisted 'You should have known better.'
You still should know better. It's not going to work with the judge, and for the exact same reason.
Okay, the gay revolution has spawned idiots to try their hand at securing rights for their own preferences. The line is drawn at adult consent. Go away, or see what prison is like. If I'm on the jury, you will.
The thing is that it IS molestation because the child can't consent.
Seriously, how many children "want" sex of their own free will? Children don't know anything about sex unless they've already been exposed to it. The thing is that sexual predators know how to groom children and talk them into sexual situations, then claim they're innocent because the child was the one who initiated sex.
Unfortunately, what a delusional child-molestation apologist considers "molestation" and what the law considers molestation are two very, very different things.
If someone isn't old enough to sign a legally-binding contract, they can't give informed consent.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.