There should be no sexual consent age.
Sorry, but governments don't have any right to regulate sex between two consenting human beings.
21 comments
Yes, there should! Just as we don't think children are ready to drive cars, vote, drink alcohol, etc, we also don't think children are ready to have sex.
Society has every right to protect impressionable children from manipulating sexual predators.
Children can't give informed consent.
Okay, I'll just ramble on about this for a little bit, because while this is relevant to the topic at hand, it also explains a lot of other crap I've talked about here and there, really.
I've said, a few times, people could consider me a pedophile. That's really not true. I'm not attracted to young girls, I'm attracted to the IDEA of young girls. (YoungER, to be fair! I'm talking about at least, 13 and up, in my mind, okay?). Happily, I've met a few women who were happy to indulge me in fantasies along those lines. One of which whom, was quite pleased to call me "Daddy" while I called her my "daughter'. (RIP.)
With all that said, that's still just effing wrong!
Fuck you. Kids can't consent to sex with adults. Even if they understand what sex is, the power dynamics are too heavily skewed against them, meaning they can easily be manipulated or coerced into doing something they are not ready for.
"KingOfRhye
Obviously, a guy who doesn't have a daughter."
So you need to have a daughter to have a basic sense of empathy and decency toward children, now?
@KingOfRhye
" (YoungER, to be fair! I'm talking about at least, 13 and up, in my mind, okay?)"
13 isn't "youngER". 13 is a child.
@Isa
No, I'm not saying that, I'm saying it would help him.
@2038569
Yeah, I know that 13 is still a child. I was talking about an age-limit to something that is nothing but a fantasy in my head that I have on occasion, engaged with with other people. Ever heard of "age-play"?
But science does. It's immoral and unreasonable to have sex with children, because it's cruel. They are not mentally or physically developed enough to give *informed* consent, and don't yet understand the consequences of said sex acts, depending on the age of said child. (meaning they haven't had sex Ed classes). Even if they do know the consequences, it's still wrong, because they're not built for it, and you can cause harm, mentally and physically.
And unless you wish to be eviscerated by child's parents/guardians/family, you'll keep your peepee parts to your Loli porn
“There should be no sexual consent age.”
Is there any reason other than a desire to fuck preteens for this stance?
“Sorry, but governments don't have any right to regulate sex between two consenting human beings.”
Well, SOMEONE needs to define ‘human being,’ in this case. That’d be a government function.
And ‘consenting’ would be defined by the government. How to kjow they’re consenting, what consenting means, are there limits to what consent covers.
If not, you get parents taking their kid’s lover to sourt, trying to prove that he or she isn’t human because of race, religion, socioeconomic status, whatever. And claiming that by consenting to sex he agreed to marriage, a dowry, and five grandkids.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.