On Origin of life:
"Humans have emotions. However, I have never seen chemicals in my laboratory expressing love to each other. Have you?"
"We can study the composition - chemical, biological, physical etc. of a chicken egg. However, given those chemicals, we cannot produce a chicken egg. Thus, it is high time when noble prize should be awarded to hens for laying eggs."
Ph there are so many!
"Example: Let us suppose I find some historical object in India and move to USA to show their. On my way, I am killed and the object is lost in Egypt (say). Now some other historian will find that and claim that the object belongs to an Egyptian civilization. Thus, original place of these objects are not trustworthy."
"Scientists conclude on the basis of 2, 3 observations which are quite insignificant to conclude such a big theory."
"According to this theory, evolution makes organisms better. So, humans should have long span of life, stay more healthy, less sickness, more activeness etc. However, this prediction is totally opposite to what is observed. A research becomes a theory only when it predicts something correctly."
"If evolution is to make things better, then why are those organisms surviving from which others evolved? Darwin’s immediate forefather, monkey is still surviving. Why?"
"C-dating method to predict age of dead matter is not accurate and trustworthy. Can it calculate the life of a human died a month ago? "