FSTDT

Tom DiFerdinando #quack #conspiracy rethinkingaids.com

We will focus on the AIDS-Covid relationship, its social, economic and medical implications, and the problems with the scientific foundations of virology. To keep it simple, we will be highlighting three major elephants in the Covidian living room:

1) the "in silico virus"
2) the life-threatening effects of lockdowns, and
3) the grand mRNA "vaccine" industry experiment humanity has uncritically agreed to subject itself to.

Once you understand the significance and consequences of these three things, you will have a pretty solid grasp of what has actually been happening, why it's been happening, who has been making it happen, and where it's supposed to go.

[…]

When is it going to end and who is going to stop it? The most remarkable thing about Public Health is that it is the only discipline - and Fauci the only public figure - that can boast fifty years of consistent, abject failure, and still claim "success" and command billions of dollars annually in tax payer funding. We want to cut through the Public Health Official mystique that shields this unconscionable behavior and reverse the deeply ingrained tendency of the wider public to uncritically support and enable it.

Like dealing with any destructive bully, the AIDS/Covid cabal and the global machinery it is connected to thrives not only on our ignorance, but more importantly on our compliance. With condoms, masks, social distance and experimental injections, lockdowns, business closures, vaccine passports and open-ended mandates - all to promote the rebranding of "flu" - we've permitted a Central State to take responsibility for our health and our immune systems. Our compliance, and the willing surrender of responsibility for our bodies, our health and our personal freedom, is the real virus that is destroying the fabric of our decreasingly free society.

Rethinking AIDS #conspiracy rethinkingaids.com

In Wikipedia, the HIV/AIDS hypothesis is only rarely maintained and defended by editors using their real names. The problem is that the logic and assumptions underlying the hypothesis are so fundamentally dishonest that, like the press secretary of a tottering tyrant or failing president, anyone who becomes publicly and continually associated with them eventually suffers a damaged personal and professional reputation.

Considering the amount of work and risk involved, no one would bother for long without a direct or indirect special interest. What better solution than to hide behind a pseudonym, given that most editors use them by custom? That’s our opportunity. We dissidents went public with our views when we became signatories here or on our Facebook page, so there is nothing to stop us from doing the same on Wikipedia.

It's a curious situation: dissidents have names but orthodoxists don't. Isn't it supposed to be the other way around?

We suggest a crowdsourcing approach specifically to keep dissidents focused only on edits that will garner the most support from other dissidents. Template messages are the obvious place to start. Later, as informal associations among us congeal, more detailed text-edits among a range of HIV/AIDS articles (see above) should become feasible.

Use the Discussion pages for that, but don’t waste your time trying to reason with or convert pseudonyms. (If a rare real-name orthodoxist editor should challenge you, have fun.) And finally, be careful of burnout. Towards that end, try to limit your edits to one per article per day. Speed and convenience is the idea.

Rethinking AIDS #fundie rethinkingaids.com

Rethinking AIDS (RA) is a voluntary, open-membership association of people who have signed the petition agreeing that “It is widely believed by the general public that a retrovirus called HIV causes the group diseases called AIDS. Many biochemical scientists now question this hypothesis. We propose that a thorough reappraisal of the existing evidence for and against this hypothesis be conducted by a suitable independent group. We further propose that critical epidemiological studies be devised and undertaken.”

RA seeks to bring critical reappraisal to all the facts and generalizations that have been misinterpreted under HIV/AIDS theory and to make the media and the general public aware of the pressing need for such reappraisal, including the corrosive impact of this theory on scientific research and on the human and legal rights of people who test positive on an “HIV test.”