As everybody know blacks, MENAs and other Third Worlders, specially from Asia (Pakistan, India, etc) have contributed nothing to the European society (they are unable) but what will be their genetic impact? Seeing all these millions living in France, Germany, Sweden, UK, etc is hard to imagine they will not do. Only an immediate massive expulsion could save Europe of this.
Last true Pagan Emperor of Rome Diocletian (known for great Prosecution of Christians) said: "Christianity is a trap made by the Jews to make Romans worship their Messiah, to make us Slaves of Jews". While I don't approve his methods I agree with him.
We muslims do not give any significance to any messiah whatsoever, we believe in judgment after death. We believe in Jesus but not as savior, according to our teaching he is/was merely servant of God and he is coming back to murder one of many Jesus saviors that are about to appear. But we are immune to any Savior cause we know it's not God.
Modern Christians are basically in trap by the Jews, tomorow when some Messiah with superpowers appear Jews will say: "Here Christians this is our Messiah and Jesus" and Christians will all run to him. Christian view on Jesus is no different to Pagan view on Hercules or other "sons of Zeus".
I will never stop Christians to practice their religion, in my opinion (eventually) they will uncover how deceived they were themselves.
Well there is a difference between the orientation and the action. The Catholic Church teaches something like LBGT people should be treated normally, but their actions relating to homosexuality are bad. Personally I think the actions should be criminal and genderbending completely banned.
I believe that many of the gays are not born that way. In fact, it is not proven at all genetically. I believe it happens around the age of puberty when boys and girls are more separated than ever before. When forming friendships, the boy that will turn out gay will end up being weak and feminine and having female friends. He will start to identify more with girls, yet may or may not display outward effeminate behavior. During puberty everything happens so fast as hormones as rushing and raging. This is where demonic forces come in and confuse people into same sex attraction.
When I was at school, I had very few friends male or female. I noticed at puberty I was attracted to girls immediately (and had been before). But I was worried I may be a gay, because I noticed other guys too. But once I made friends with boys my own age, all of the same sex desire went completely away. Then it dawned on me, I wasn't a gay. I was just longing for male friendship. This is what young men/boys need. Unfortunately, they don't have many people to talk to, and when they do, these days, they will most likely to be urged to "come out" as gay- embrace their "sexuality". When it was never real to start with. It's a combination of a melancholic/sensitive personality type, with isolation from same sex role models.
America's either controlled by Korean/Latino or made secret music deals with them. There's no way that these absurd Latino hip hop videos and Korean music call K-pop can dominate the western world like this without a helping hand. Where's Bollywood music getting a billion views or winning the billboard award ? There's a billion people in India alone and you're there be these countries barely a hundred million and yet have around 3-4 billion youtube views ??? It's not like they are singing in English... they are singing in Spanish and Korean.
Nearly 100 youtube videos with billion views and not one of them is from India. Why are Latinos music so dominant ? What's so special about Latino music ? most of them are always songs about how women dancing in the slumps and clubs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...YouTube_videos Despacito" 4.66 billion views, "Bailando" 2.45 billion views., Shantaje 2.05 billion views
Gangnam style is Korean. It was the first video to reach billion views and over 10 million likes. It also has 3 billion views ????? BTS a Korean boyband win the 2017 America's billboard award, their videos also have 200-300 million views in a month. Lol ask yourself why not Japanese ? There's so many anime or video game songs from PlayStation 3 and 4, so why ain't one of them as popular ?
the more neotenous a race, the more intelligent and higher cranial capacity and neuroplasticity
Northeast Asia has the most neotenized societies in the world. They have very high standard of living, relatively peaceful, and also high in human rights index as well as education, sciences, and mathematics. This has something to do with neoteny, though I’m not really sure. That’s why they lead the world in technology (Sony, Samsung, Panasonic, Mitsubishi, Mazda, Hyundai, etc.) and IQ tests (average Japanese IQ is 105, Hong Kong Chinese IQ is 107, the highest in the world, South Korean IQ is 106, Taiwan 104, Singapore 103, China 100[17]). Japan is one of the safest countries in the world, with two cities, Tokyo and Osaka, placed 1st and 3rd in Business Insider’s top 20 safest cities in the world.[18] Also included safest cities/states are Singapore (2nd), Hong Kong (11th), and Taipei (13th)[18], all found in the same region, except Singapore, which is in Southeast Asia, but with large Chinese ethnicity. (NE Asia has high human development index with the exception of China PR and North Korea)
Outside Northeast Asia, the most neotenized people are of Northern European (Nordic, Celtic, Germanic) origin. Though they are not as neotenous as East Asians, Nordics do have neotenous features like blond hair and blue eyes (also red hair and green, hazel, and gray eyes), which is absent in the rest of the world population. And comparing them along with redheads and brunette Northern Europeans, they look more baby face than Mediterraneans (Southern European), who look a lot more mature. (Among Caucasoids, their infants are lighter than the adults, Northern Europeans retained their youthful features in adulthood)
Northern Europeans have also psychological neoteny. This is apparent by their individualistic notion of self (I am independent of my own thinking), which is absent in other races even Asians, having very high affective empathy[19], which is a very neotenic trait, and delayed marriage (prolonged childhood) and childbearing pattern. These traits are very helpful in establishing human rights and dignity of labor, principles found only in NW Europe. Maybe these factors made Northern Europe the most prosperous region in the world (renaissance, reformation, enlightenment, industrial revolution, etc. these novel ideas are products of extreme creativity that defies societal norms commonly found in people with ADHD and autism spectrum).
thus the more archaic = more primitive = lower IQ
East Asians and Whites have shorter jaws, gracile faces and big cranium. A shorter jaw means more neoteny. Africans have large protruding jaws = less neoteny
The "Equal Pay" is perhaps the easiest Feminazi lie to debunk. Why should women receive "equal pay" with men, meanwhile, the female gender itself has sexual value, proved by the existence of prostitution? A prostitute can sell her sex, to men, for $100 to $1000 in a single night. This proves that women don't need jobs, at all. Women have their sex, inherently, to sell. So a woman having her sex to sell, on top of "Equal Pay", gives her too much value. It gives average women way, way, way more power than average men. And that is what "Feminism" truly represents, a misappropriation of social power.
I think we're all ignoring the economic roots of this problem. All of these men have college loans, some near $100,000: without these loans, they can't go to school, something society has taught them they must do, but under that sort of debt, most can't get a good start in the job market. Add into this mixture the fact that the 19-27 demographic has an unemployment rate of something in the vicinity of 20 per cent in the United States, and you're looking at an entire generation who are not being allowed to move out of their parents' house unless they're willing to sleep on a park bench under a ceiling of cardboard. Frankly, it's not our fault and it's not our failure - many of us have already succeeded greatly, but our success means nothing because it is not producing any financial gain. I say "us" because I'm in this demographic, working a minimum-wage job for under 30 hours a week and struggling to survive.
While I will not dispute that the Baby Boomers have failed, their failures as human beings and members of the national community are far greater than their failures as parents. People born between 1945 and 1965 have destroyed the entire Western world, and now refuse to move out of the way so that we can fix it. We see a Negro elected president, the realisation of their dreams, and in a bad economy they refuse to retire and make space for the rising generation -- a generation which must bear a far greater burden than any of them, greedy, selfish, and solipsistic, have ever had to bear.
Every people has its own "Volksgeist" - voelkisch spirit. The Orientals' is different from ours very fundamentally. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise.
Take the Chinese. The people we now call "Chinese" were content in feudalism for basically the entirety of the past 4,000 years. Their "high civilizations" were all aristocracies built on the back of a rigid -- almost-cartoonishly-rigid -- feudal social order. The Oriental philosophy of Confucianism is simply the codification of feudal ethics, nothing more. This seems to be the social order that they are genetically inclined to and are happiest in. Compare to the European experience. We had true feudalism for more like 400 years, at most. And we call it our "dark ages"! When we finally got out of it, we call that period the Renaissance, the Rebirth! This pretty clearly points to a very fundamental difference in character. That difference can still easily be observed in modern societies.
Yes, "culture" and social organization is mostly the product of genetic inclinations among the population. A people tend to drift towards the social model to which they are most suited. (And, over time, a "culture" selects for those fit for its system; But not to get bogged down in Chicken-vs-Egg-ism, let's just say genetics tends to correlate with social orders and "cultural traits"). This is why many of the racialist holdouts in the post-1945 West were criticizing the Nixonian Domino-Theory panic-mongering about the dangers of the entirety of the Orient falling to communism. The western racialists, as in Willis Carto and his kind in the USA, aptly stated that authoritarian communism probably was more suited to the Oriental character, so a) what right do we have to impose alien ways on them, and b) Fighting wars like Vietnam and intervening in Cambodia and the like, were doomed to fail, for sure. Orientals tended towards communism because they were genetically inclined to authoritarian collectivism, unlike Europeans. I think Wilmot Robertson argued this explicitly in his delightful little book, The Ethnostate.
If the Orientals have culture(s) that discourage independent thought, discourage critical thinking, discourage creativity, discourage organizational skill, discourage most forms of initiative, discourage the concept of having an eye for inherent quality, and encourage form over substance in grotesque ways... Well, wiping all that away with a culture argument is no different at all from apologists for our racial-African cousins' behavior, past and present and future. "If Africans had a better culture, they would be identical to whites". That statement is the height of fallacy in the most fundamental of way