Charles Rotter #conspiracy #dunning-kruger wattsupwiththat.com
[This is a reaction to a Nature article where the author twists the quotes to fit his worldview. I have removed said quotes.]
1. The Carbon Budget Is a Fantasy
The entire idea of a “carbon budget” depends on the assumption that we can accurately track all natural and anthropogenic carbon sources and sinks.
[…]
We were missing a carbon leak as big as the net carbon uptake of all land-based ecosystems. That’s like losing a financial ledger entry equivalent to your annual revenue and still claiming your books balance.
2. Climate Models Can’t Model What They Didn’t Know Existed
This isn’t a rounding error. This is a previously invisible carbon flux at a planetary scale—entirely omitted from mainstream Earth system models. […]
For those of us who have long argued that climate models are glorified curve-fitting exercises based on selectively tuned assumptions, this study is pure vindication. It’s an outright admission that the models are not merely imperfect—they’re structurally blind to major natural processes.
3. Climate Science Is Still in Diapers
If 59% of riverine CO2 emissions come from millennial or older carbon pools, then just how settled can the science be? […]
Imagine building a trillion-dollar global policy framework on a dataset that left out half the equation. It would be funny if it weren’t tragic.
4. Anthropogenic Carbon Attribution Is Now a Shell Game
One of the central talking points of climate activists is that CO2 in the atmosphere is traceable and largely caused by human emissions. This study kicks that stool out from under them. […]
That means nearly 60% of river-based CO2 emissions are from carbon predating modern industrial activity. This calls into question the accuracy of anthropogenic attribution models—models which governments use to justify taxes, regulations, and top-down restructurings of energy and agriculture.