It is not racist to not want your child to marry someone of another race. If you have valid reasoning for it, that is.
What would be valid is suggesting that race-mixing causes a degradation of the genealogy and causes the next generation to be less valuable than the last.
Also, interracial marriage destroys the races, as it mixes them all up.
19 comments
No, 'poopy-ville', ethnic-mixing is GOOD for the human gene pool!
Oh, and....OBAMA WON! MORE WOMEN IN THE SENATE! DEMOCRATIC GAINS MORE SENATE SEATS! ELIZABETH WARREN'S A SENATOR!
I'm gonna have fun reading F/R/CSTDTs now! Seeing all the bigoted, misogynist, ethnicist, homophobic, xenophobic, teabagger, warmongering chickenhawk maniacs crying tears of impotent rage!
The Blue Donkey sez....
image
..."Thanks fer votin' fer me!"
(I love Eeyore, so cute. He's gray in cartoons but he's blue in art. I had to put in a pic of a cute blue donkey you'd wanna hug.)
It is not racist to not want your child to marry someone of another race. If you have valid reasoning for it, that is.
If that reasoning is simply about race, yes, then it is racist. That is what that word means
What would be valid is suggesting that race-mixing causes a degradation of the genealogy and causes the next generation to be less valuable than the last.
Only if you could tell us how you are measuring this “value” in a meaningful way.
Also, interracial marriage destroys the races, as it mixes them all up.
So what?
If you have valid reasoning for it, that is.
Trouble is few people can come up with valid reasoning. What you consider valid is mainstream racism.
@SpukiKitty : Get ready for four more years of tears of impotent conservative rage.
"It is not racist to not want your child to marry someone of another race." Well, you could argue it was xenophobic, but the difference between xenophobia and racism is very small, so you probably are.
"If you have valid reasoning for it, that is." If it is a specific someone, yes. But as you generally don't like your kids to marry a person from another race, there's no specific reason behind it. So what you're telling us is that you are reacist.
"What would be valid is suggesting that race-mixing causes a degradation of the genealogy and causes the next generation to be less valuable than the last." The only way to argue that race mixing leads to the next generation being "less valuable" is if one race was superior to another - the one belief that defines being racist. If all races have different characteristics (for example being better for atheletics or being able to deal with the cold better) than these characteristics and whether or not they are valuable is question of were that person lives - rendering the entire point mood.
"Also, interracial marriage destroys the races, as it mixes them all up." How is that a bad thing?
"Also, interracial marriage destroys the races, as it mixes them all up."
Which would pretty well end racism, so bring it on!
How much are you ready to bet that this person has not been giving presents to his nefews and nieces on christmas, has been shunning them in family events, or even worse, has children of his own and is doing as little for them as he can get away with?
Because rationates for what makes the next generation less valuable usually boil down to one trying to shut his own conscience up about being a dick to kids.
"What would be valid is suggesting that race-mixing causes a degradation of the genealogy and causes the next generation to be less valuable than the last."
How? Just asserting that it does will not a valid reason make... Fact is, mixing up the genes like that is incredibly beneficial, meaning the next generation is MORE valuable than the earlier "pure" generations.
"race-mixing...causes the next generation to be less valuable than the last."
Fuck you. Value isn't some fixed quantity we're intrinsically born with. It's subjective and comes from the people who love us. You're basically saying that if you have mixed-race grandchildren, you'll love them less than grandchildren whose parents are of the same ethnicity. Again, fuck you!
"interracial marriage destroys the races, as it mixes them all up."
This has been happening for hundreds of thousands of years, you dumb fuck. There never was such a thing as "race" as discrete categories of people with a biological basis. Now go repeat elementary school science, you ignorant jackass.
In the dog world it is well known that mixed-breed dogs are generally more robust then purebreeds.
Also, interracial kids are prettier.
“It is not racist to not want your child to marry someone of another race.”
You’re juding this hypothetical person solely on their race. Of fucking course it’s racist.
“If you have valid reasoning for it, that is.”
Yeah, i’ve heard ’it’s not racist if it’s true’ a thousand times. Doesn’t change the fact that it’s racist.
“What would be valid is suggesting that race-mixing causes a degradation of the genealogy”
Ah. The ‘pure’ bloodline ends with the interracial kids, i see. Except that ‘degradation’ is only in the minds of racists. The rest of us play with our grandkids and spoil them ROTTEN.
So, no, it’s not valid and it’s certainly not an apology to get you out of being a racist.
“and causes the next generation to be less valuable than the last.”
Again, less valuable TO RACISTS. Who can fuck right off, frankly.
“Also, interracial marriage destroys the races, as it mixes them all up.”
It doesn’t destroy races, idiot. What it does do is blur the entirely artificial lines between the races. And makes it quite clear that the lines don’t matter a damn.
The only thing destroyed is the racist justification for being a racist. As the ‘races’ merge and mix, it’ll be harder and harder to be taken seiously when fuckbunkers like you claim there are significant differences.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.